Helmonder
-
Posts
2817 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Store
Gallery
Bug Reports
Documentation
Landing
Everything posted by Helmonder
-
Still stable... no errors at all and a very "relaxed" syslog.. No warnings or errors since the 5th..
-
My mistake... I meant the virtio drivers.. Sorry forf the confusion
-
Since the error was referencing KVM and i saw that old libvirt version I have updated it and recreated the libvirt file.. After doing that I saw some old VM's coming back that had not been active, but my correct one (the one that was active) was not in that list... I deleted the wrong ones and re-added (vdisk was ofcourse still there) the missing VM, worked fine. I have also pinned two threads to the VM (and two other threads to my plex docker). I have since both actions not seen any page allocation failure messages.. As they appeared to be there on a daily basis and it has now been stable for 48 hours these might have made a difference..
-
Did notice that I was using quite old virtio drivers.. Maybe that could have something to do with it.. Also recreated my libvirt file just to be sure..
-
Will do ! 10:03 disabled my VM (one server) and the VM service as a first try. Since last reboot (This morning) no errors in the log. Maybe there is a relation to this thread:
-
Just woke up to a crashed system, different effect then the last time (See previous post below) Diagnostics are attached. Last error in the log was: Jan 5 06:20:19 Tower shfs: fuse internal error: unable to unhash node: 562319961 Jan 5 06:20:19 Tower shfs: fuse internal error: unable to unhash node: 562319961 Where in previous cases the errors made the total system unavailable now the webinterface is still running but there are no exported shares at all.. When I look on terminal I can still see the diskshares, and there also is the "user0" share, but no "user share". I will now reboot. -> reboot worked, system back up, no parity check started.. Which in itself might be something to look at.. System probably crashed in such a way that it could not determine that a parity issue could exist ? I will start one myself. tower-diagnostics-20200105-0835.zip
-
Snapshops they way I figured it was meant is for VM's and dockers.... For data it is indead not very usefull.. Though probably not difficult to implement on top of vm and docker..
-
Bonienl: Not sure since it took the system a week to crash (in the betas and also now) It would be a bit of a hassle to leave the system in safe mode for a week. I posted to let people know what happened. If the issue does not come back in a week the issues most likely lies in one of the plugins.. I can then bring them back one by one.. Kind of a "safe mode light" scenario. Should the system still crash in a week then I will bite the bullet and let it run in safe mode.. Thanks for your response !
-
What do the following errors indicate ? Dec 25 19:26:21 Tower kernel: WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 23216 at net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c:945 __nf_conntrack_confirm+0xa0/0x69e Dec 25 19:26:21 Tower kernel: CPU: 5 PID: 23216 Comm: kworker/5:0 Not tainted 4.19.88-Unraid #1 Dec 25 19:26:21 Tower kernel: Call Trace: (first line warning, second and third error)
-
-
Gottit... I used to use cloud backup but went away from it... The free or cheap ones change or go away to often for my sake.. I was very happy with crashplan untill it decided to stop doing what I used... This causing me to setup something new and work towards getting 50TB of data back into someone elses cloud... I ended up setting up a second unraid server with cheaper hardware and using syncthing to keep them up to date on irregular basis (the secundary system is allmost allways off, I turn it on a couple of times per year to make sure it is synced. The fact that it is mostly off also makes sure that I do not run into any risks with cryptoware (or at least: not as fast).. The secundary server has no exposed drives, that also makes it more secure... I was planning to move it out of the house but ended up never doing that.. Still something I would like to do..
-
I payed for unraid years and years ago and am still receiving updates... To be perfectly honoust the machine (and my backup server, I have no test system, if you do not want to be on the bleeding edge you do not need one) is such a big thing in my household that I would prefer an option where some kind of payed subscription would guarantee me support in the long run.. I have seen to much one-time-pay situations that end up saturating their market halting growth and then dying off.. Unraid has found a new user base in virtualisation which (I guess) has caused a second wave. I can see a third wave coming with better support for secondary systems.. But secretely I hooooooooope that they find some kind of great feature that I would love to pay for on a monthly basis 🙂
-
Same here.... not working any more..
-
System just crashed again.. No webgui, no telnet.. This time no parity check was running. See attached for a screenprint of my IPMI .. Since I have IPMI I was able to access the console and have been able to write my syslog to /boot.. It is attached here. I am seeing (I think) a lot of out of memory type errors. I am now reverting to the previous release. syslog.zip
-
I upgraded two days ago and have had two crashes since.. All OOM ... Parity checks were running at that time and there were references to cache_dirs .. Unfortunately I have not been able to salvage logs..
-
I have been having issues with CA for some weeks, looks like I found the issue.. Installing CA (and i presume using it) sends requests to raw.githubusercontent.com . This site is blacklisted in pihole by default. When reading what that url does it is a mystery to me why it is blacklisted to be honoust... Anyone any idea ? I have now whitelisted it and everything is fine again.
-
ZFS is meh... At least for now.. It brings back several limitations that we currently do not have with unraid and that I really like not having... Like not deciding how back your pools are, no need to have same type/same size disks.. You also need an amount of RAM per TB in your server and that adds up quickly.. My info is from a few years back so stuff might be different..
-
You posted in the wrong board, this one is for when you want unraid itself to run in a virtualization environment. What you want is what everyone is doing (and which is easy), run unraid and run windows INSIDE of unraid (where unraid is doing the job of a hypervisor). Its not difficult at all... and there are a few good youtube vids to guide you thru it..
-
Sorry..out of ideas.... 😞 -
It does not prove anything, could still be that the drives are having issues.. But memory sounds more likely then..
-
Check SMART values from the menu..
-
Hi, I just upgraded my server: Consequently I have allmost my complete old system for sale now: - Supermicro X9SCM-F - Installed Xeon E31230 - CPU cooler (Coolermaster) - 32GB of ECC Ram Basically everything you need but for a case, psu and drives. I think EUR 250 would be a nice price. Anyone ?
-
If you can scrape it together I would go for the new hardware...
-
Do you see the network cards under settings / network ?
-
I would run it again.. Also maybe check your drives? If the segfaults are unrelated then maybe there is a disk having issues..
