IronBeardKnight
-
Posts
69 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Store
Gallery
Bug Reports
Documentation
Landing
Posts posted by IronBeardKnight
-
-
On 7/4/2022 at 10:31 PM, Slarti123 said:
Thanks, everyone:
Solved.
For the record (and others):
1) Traccar:
The template createa a folder called "traccar.xml". You have to delete that and upload the linked XML file, instead (and of course, do not autostart the docker, before).For some reason, that created a container that was never ever able to start again, even though I manually copied as described.
Had to remove the container, delete the image, manually delete all data in "appdata" and then set everything up from scratch as desribed above.
2) TVH:to give you the full picture: still not sure about the initial reasons. Still, similar solution: completely delete container, image and "appdata". New, clean setup. Works now...
Thanks a lot!Hey guys having this issue trying to get the container started have used the documentation and template to get the xml with MySQL db backend also using ChatGPT for some rough Gutenberg and having no luck as I keep getting the below.
text error warn system array login
at java.base/jdk.internal.util.xml.impl.Parser.ent(Parser.java:1994)
at java.base/jdk.internal.util.xml.impl.Parser.step(Parser.java:471)
at java.base/jdk.internal.util.xml.impl.ParserSAX.parse(ParserSAX.java:477)
at java.base/jdk.internal.util.xml.impl.ParserSAX.parse(ParserSAX.java:411)
at java.base/jdk.internal.util.xml.impl.ParserSAX.parse(ParserSAX.java:374)
at java.base/jdk.internal.util.xml.impl.SAXParserImpl.parse(SAXParserImpl.java:97)
at java.base/jdk.internal.util.xml.PropertiesDefaultHandler.load(PropertiesDefaultHandler.java:83)
... 19 more
2024-02-23 22:53:04 ERROR: Main method error - - SAXParseException (... < Config:46 < <gener:-1 < *:-1 < ... < Main:116 < ...)
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.RuntimeException: com.google.inject.CreationException: Unable to create injector, see the following errors:1) [Guice/ErrorInjectingConstructor]: RuntimeException: Configuration file is not a valid XML document
at Config.<init>(Config.java:42)
at MainModule.configure(MainModule.java:116)
while locating ConfigLearn more:
https://github.com/google/guice/wiki/ERROR_INJECTING_CONSTRUCTOR1 error
======================
Full classname legend:
======================
Config: "org.traccar.config.Config"
MainModule: "org.traccar.MainModule"
========================
End of classname legend:
========================at org.traccar.Main.run(Main.java:146)
at org.traccar.Main.main(Main.java:110)
Caused by: com.google.inject.CreationException: Unable to create injector, see the following errors:1) [Guice/ErrorInjectingConstructor]: RuntimeException: Configuration file is not a valid XML document
at Config.<init>(Config.java:42)
at MainModule.configure(MainModule.java:116)
while locating ConfigLearn more:
https://github.com/google/guice/wiki/ERROR_INJECTING_CONSTRUCTOR1 error
======================
Full classname legend:
======================
Config: "org.traccar.config.Config"
MainModule: "org.traccar.MainModule"
========================
End of classname legend:
========================at com.google.inject.internal.Errors.throwCreationExceptionIfErrorsExist(Errors.java:589)
at com.google.inject.internal.InternalInjectorCreator.injectDynamically(InternalInjectorCreator.java:190)
at com.google.inject.internal.InternalInjectorCreator.build(InternalInjectorCreator.java:113)
at com.google.inject.Guice.createInjector(Guice.java:87)
at com.google.inject.Guice.createInjector(Guice.java:69)
at com.google.inject.Guice.createInjector(Guice.java:59)
at org.traccar.Main.run(Main.java:116)
... 1 more
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Configuration file is not a valid XML document
at org.traccar.config.Config.<init>(Config.java:64)
at org.traccar.config.Config$$FastClassByGuice$$9a3fc4.GUICE$TRAMPOLINE(<generated>)
at org.traccar.config.Config$$FastClassByGuice$$9a3fc4.apply(<generated>)
at com.google.inject.internal.DefaultConstructionProxyFactory$FastClassProxy.newInstance(DefaultConstructionProxyFactory.java:82)
at com.google.inject.internal.ConstructorInjector.provision(ConstructorInjector.java:114)
at com.google.inject.internal.ConstructorInjector.construct(ConstructorInjector.java:91)
at com.google.inject.internal.ConstructorBindingImpl$Factory.get(ConstructorBindingImpl.java:300)
at com.google.inject.internal.ProviderToInternalFactoryAdapter.get(ProviderToInternalFactoryAdapter.java:40)
at com.google.inject.internal.SingletonScope$1.get(SingletonScope.java:169)
at com.google.inject.internal.InternalFactoryToProviderAdapter.get(InternalFactoryToProviderAdapter.java:45)
at com.google.inject.internal.InternalInjectorCreator.loadEagerSingletons(InternalInjectorCreator.java:213)
at com.google.inject.internal.InternalInjectorCreator.injectDynamically(InternalInjectorCreator.java:186)
... 6 more
Caused by: java.util.InvalidPropertiesFormatException: jdk.internal.org.xml.sax.SAXParseException;
at java.base/jdk.internal.util.xml.PropertiesDefaultHandler.load(PropertiesDefaultHandler.java:85)
at java.base/java.util.Properties.loadFromXML(Properties.java:986)
at org.traccar.config.Config.<init>(Config.java:46)
... 17 more
Caused by: jdk.internal.org.xml.sax.SAXParseException;
at java.base/jdk.internal.util.xml.impl.ParserSAX.panic(ParserSAX.java:652)
at java.base/jdk.internal.util.xml.impl.Parser.ent(Parser.java:1994)
at java.base/jdk.internal.util.xml.impl.Parser.step(Parser.java:471)
at java.base/jdk.internal.util.xml.impl.ParserSAX.parse(ParserSAX.java:477)
at java.base/jdk.internal.util.xml.impl.ParserSAX.parse(ParserSAX.java:411)
at java.base/jdk.internal.util.xml.impl.ParserSAX.parse(ParserSAX.java:374)
at java.base/jdk.internal.util.xml.impl.SAXParserImpl.parse(SAXParserImpl.java:97)
at java.base/jdk.internal.util.xml.PropertiesDefaultHandler.load(PropertiesDefaultHandler.java:83)
... 19 more
-
As very long user of unraid and someone who has brought on many customers with home servers I think its great your looking at ways to bring money back into your company to increase your feature profile and the stability of the product.
I don't however believe that charging customers for security updates of which many are in fact bug fixes should be in any part of an update or subscription based model and that to me should be simply protested out of existence, however if your introducing a completely now way of doing security or an implementation that increases security giving features and benefits not just fixing the bugs you missed in your previous release then this may be ok.
Example:
Ok to pay:
Introduced new version of docker and have take some of those features and created new unraid unique features
NOT OK TO PAY
The community has raised an issue with the you that for example the docker driver your using has been implemented incorrectly and to fix it you should make a default config change. That in my opinion is not something you should be allowed to charge your community for.
We as Unraiders never want to be put in a position where we feel like we are being charged to be the beta testers for your product.
A very clear and in dept explanation per update is going to have to be given in your change logs to justify update price but charging a heavy fee for something like a docker or some other third party applications hard work is not something ill ever pay for and would probably end up moving to a different software.In this example I understand that work may need to be done to integrate with a new system but for me to pay for it I would like to know what I'm truly paying for.
In a digital world where security is of upmost importance and I think if your going to truly tackle security issues and even ones other third party companies or containers that have been neglected for so long and you can justify that then sure the price may be right.
I personally would love to seen docker image inspection features like what wiz or Prisma do obviously not as advanced but stuff that lets me know if the dockers i'm running are vulnerable or have out of date libraries being used or trigger CVE's and give me a runtime option to fix these issues. That is the type of security features I expect to see for upgrade prices not just other peoples hard work.
Otherwise where this goes remains to be seen and I can only hope this leads a product I love to even greater heights.
-
1
-
-
anyone have any information on enabling cuda on the new version just being released as it appears that they have gotten rid of any inkling that the separate tensort models are still needed or not.
I have just added the additional variable to the container for "cuda" to be added however not sure its actually doing anything.
As the immich documentation only pertaining to running it normally through docker i'm not sure if I should need to map the docker config files to my local system in unraid so I can persistently edit them in accordance with immich documentation.
Any information for fellow immich users is greatly appreciated as its a fantastic application. -
2 hours ago, b0mb said:
So can i put whole folders in to that textfile for the skipping list?
Yes
-
1
-
-
21 hours ago, Underscoreus said:
Alright, thanks for the confirming. Hopefully shouldn't affect me too much since I'm going with the pools approach.
Hopefully now with significant investment ZFS will get its pool expansion issues finally polished off soon
-
6 hours ago, JorgeB said:
There's currently a bug affecting write speeds for zfs on the array:
yeah one of the reasons I switched back. when the bug is fixed I may look again in future but have wasted enough time transferring files around already on this.
Appreciate the reply mate.
-
NVME CACHE
I transferred from btrfs to zfs and have had a very noticeable decrease in write speed before and after memory cache has been filled not only that but the ram being used as a cache makes me nerves even though I have a ups and ecc memory, I have noticed that my duel nvme raid1 in zfs cache pool gets full 7000mbps read but only 1500mbps max write which is a far cry from what it should be when using zfs. I will be swtich my appdata pools back to btrfs as it has nearly all the same features as zfs but is much faster from my tests.
The only thing that is missing to take advantage of the btrfs is the nice gui plugin and scripts that have been done to deal with snapshots which i'm sure someone could manage to bang up pretty quick using existing zfs scripts and plugins.Its important to note here that my main nvme cache pool was both raid1 in btrfs and zfs local to that file system type of raid1 obviously.
ARRAY
I also started doing some of my array drives to single disk zfs as per spaceinvadors videos as the array parity and expansion abilities would be handled by unraid which is where I noticed the biggest downside to me personally which was that zfs single disk unlike any zpools is obviously missing a lot of features but more so is very heavily impacted write performance and you still only get single disk read speed obviously once the ram cache was exhausted. I noticed 65% degrading in write speed to the zfs single drive.I did a lot of research into BTRFS vs ZFS and have decided to migrate all my drives and cache to BTRFS and let unraid handle parity much the same as the way spaceinvader is doing zfs but this way I don't see the performance impact I was seeing in zfs and should still be able to do all the same snapshot shifting and replication that zfs does. Doing it this way I avoid the dreaded unstable btrfs local file system raid 5/6 and I get nearly all the same features as ZFS but without the speed bug issues in Unraid.
DISCLAIMER
I'm sure ZFS is very fast when it comes to an actual zpool and not on a single disk drives situation but it also very much feels like zfs is a deep storage only file system and not really molded for an active so to speak array.Given my testing all my cache pools and the drives within them will be btrfs raid 1 or 0 ( Raid 1 giving you active bitrot protection) and my Array will be Unraid handled parity with individual BTRFS files system single disks
Hope this helps others in some way to avoid days of data transfer only to realis the pitfalls.
-
NVME CACHE
I transferred from btrfs to zfs and have had a very noticeable decrease in write speed before and after memory cache has been filled not only that but the ram being used as a cache makes me nerves even though I have a ups and ecc memory, I have noticed that my duel nvme raid1 in zfs cache pool gets full 7000mbps read but only 1500mbps max write which is a far cry from what it should be when using zfs. I will be swtich my appdata pools back to btrfs as it has nearly all the same features as zfs but is much faster from my tests.
The only thing that is missing to take advantage of the btrfs is the nice gui plugin and scripts that have been done to deal with snapshots which i'm sure someone could manage to bang up pretty quick using existing zfs scripts and plugins.Its important to note here that my main nvme cache pool was both raid1 in btrfs and zfs local to that file system type of raid1 obviously.
ARRAY
I also started doing some of my array drives to single disk zfs as per spaceinvadors videos as the array parity and expansion abilities would be handled by unraid which is where I noticed the biggest downside to me personally which was that zfs single disk unlike any zpools is obviously missing a lot of features but more so is very heavily impacted write performance and you still only get single disk read speed obviously once the ram cache was exhausted. I noticed 65% degrading in write speed to the zfs single drive.I did a lot of research into BTRFS vs ZFS and have decided to migrate all my drives and cache to BTRFS and let unraid handle parity much the same as the way spaceinvader is doing zfs but this way I don't see the performance impact I was seeing in zfs and should still be able to do all the same snapshot shifting and replication that zfs does. Doing it this way I avoid the dreaded unstable btrfs local file system raid 5/6 and I get nearly all the same features as ZFS but without the speed bug issues in Unraid.
DISCLAIMER
I'm sure ZFS is very fast when it comes to an actual zpool and not on a single disk drives situation but it also very much feels like zfs is a deep storage only file system and not really molded for an active so to speak array.Given my testing all my cache pools and the drives within them will be btrfs raid 1 or 0 ( Raid 1 giving you active bitrot protection) and my Array will be Unraid handled parity with individual BTRFS files system single disks
Hope this helps others in some way to avoid days of data transfer only to realis the pitfalls.
-
1
-
-
Hey guys having major issues with the mover process. it seems to keep hanging and the only thing I can see in its logging is "move: stat: cannot statx xxxxxxxxxx cannot be found" it would apprear that after a while the "find" process then disappears for from the open files plugin but the move button is still grayed out.
Mover seems to be a pretty buggy. I have been struggling to move everything off my cache drives to change them out with the mover and have had to resort to doing it manually as the mover keeps stalling or getting hung up on something.
No disc activity or cache activity happens
This does not seem to directly related to any particular type of file or file in general as it has happened or stalled on quite a number of different appdata files/ folders.
I'm happy to help out trying to improve the mover however I am limited time wise.
-
On 9/22/2021 at 7:05 AM, JonathanM said:
Writes to the parity array will always be limited by the speed of the parity drive(s). Not much point in trying to write to multiple data drives simultaneously when the parity drive is the bottleneck.
While this may be true for cache > array but what about array > cache would it still be the same limitation if the share is spread over multiple drives? -
For those of you that have setup the script to go with the ClamAV container but have noticed little to no activity coming from it when running "Docker Stats" this may be the fix to your issue.
I don't believe that the container is setup to do a scan on startup so you may have to trigger it by adding this line to the scripts as seen below in the screen shot.
I have also figured out how to get multithreading working although be warned when using multi you may want to schedual it for when your not using your server as it can be quite CPU and RAM hungry.Some thoughts for you before you proceed with multithreaded scans are to put a memory limit on your docker through extra parameters.
Multi Thread:
exec('docker exec ClamAV sh -c "find /scan -type f -print0 | xargs -0 -P $(nproc) clamscan"');
Single Thread:
exec('docker exec ClamAV sh -c "clamscan"');
-
1
-
-
On 12/8/2022 at 12:07 AM, IronBeardKnight said:
Hi guys,
I can see others have posted about a similar issue but I cannot seem to find where the solution may have been posted.
I cannot seem to get past this error.
@Josh.5 any advise mate is greatly appreciated and for others that may also be getting this as well.
Has anyone able to guide through this issue or even get this docker container working on unraid.
Trying to use my primary/only gpu but none of the display options seem to work. -
Hi guys,
I can see others have posted about a similar issue but I cannot seem to find where the solution may have been posted.
I cannot seem to get past this error.
@Josh.5 any advise mate is greatly appreciated and for others that may also be getting this as well.
-
On 9/25/2022 at 6:37 PM, alicex said:
Hi
May i have some configuration examples?
I'd want to ignore moving some folders and some file types like *.!qb
but my config seems not working:(
Ignore files listed inside of a text file: yes File list path: /mnt/user/media/upload/Ignore file types: Yes comma seperated list of file types: .!qb,.partor type "*.!qb,*.part" instead? or ".!qb;.part"?
Thanks in advance.
Hello, Perhaps I can provide an explanation of where you going wrong.
you have not actually provided a path properly to a list of directories you want skipped.
To be clear Ignore file types and Ignore files / folders listed inside of text file are not related they are individual settings and can be used independently.Please see below the examples:
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, KluthR said:
Exactly. It should be starting with 0 4, not * 4.
Testing now! It will take a while to run through but i'm sure this is the solution. Thank you so much for your help, I just overlooked it lol I vaguely remember having it set to 00 4 previously but that was many unraid revisions ago probably before backup version 2 came out.
Ill also try giving your plugin revision a bash over the next couple of weeks
-
9 minutes ago, KluthR said:
That seems incorrect - could you post your schedule settings from inside the plugin settings page? The current setting says "At every minute past hour 4 on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday."
OMG you are right i'm clearly having a major brain cell malfunction lol I should remove the * and replace it with 00
so it looks like this " 00 4 * * 1,3,5 "
Do you think that is correct?
-
https://crontab.guru/ is what I used as referance and from my understanding it is supposed to run at 4am every monday, wednesday and friday.
From BackupOptions.json :
-
8 minutes ago, KluthR said:
Interesting, the backup seem to start 2 times.
Could you post the output of "crontab -l" inside an unraid terminal?
-
On 11/13/2022 at 9:29 PM, IronBeardKnight said:
Ill have to wait for a backup to run so I can get a screenshot for you of the duplicate issue.
Yes restoring of single archives. for example I only want to restore duplicate or nextcloud etc. Currently if you want to do only a particular application/docker archive you need to extract the tar, stop and replace things manually.Looking forward to the merge and release. I would class this plugin as one of unraid's core utilities and its importance is high in the community. I have setup multiple unraid servers for friends and family and its always first on my list of must have things to be installed and configured.
Currently I'm using it in conjunction with duplicate for encrypted remote backups between a few different unraid servers, pre-request of my time to help them setup unraid etc and way cheaper than a google drive etc.
Being able to break backups apart into single archives without having to rely on post script extraction saves on ssd and hdd io and life. Per docker container / folder would make upload and restoring much easier and faster for example doing a restore from remote having to pull a full 80+gb single backup file can take a very long time and is very susceptible to interruption over only a 2 mb's line for example.Please see below is a couple of screenshots of the duplicate issue that has me a bit stumped.
I have been through the code that lives within the plugin as a brief overview but nothing stood out as incorrect in regards to this issue.
"\flash\config\plugins\ca.backup2\ca.backup2-2022.07.23-x86_64-1.txz\ca.backup2-2022.07.23-x86_64-1.tar\usr\local\emhttp\plugins\ca.backup2\"
I found an interesting file with paths in it that led me to a backup log file "/var/lib/docker/unraid/ca.backup2.datastore/appdata_backup.log" but as it gets re-written each backup it only shows data for the 4:48am backup and not the 4:00am one. so that is not useful, I did not find any errors within this log either.
The fact that its getting re-written most likely in my opinion means that the plugin is having issues interpreting either the settings entered or the cron that I have set
-
On 11/11/2022 at 3:38 PM, KluthR said:
Please clarify - you want to select the single archives which to restore and which not?
I want this merged, of course! As soon as Andrew has time to review everything (https://github.com/Squidly271/ca.backup2/pulls). I already made changes on top of my changes which prevents me currently of creating more PRs but I sort that out later.
Could you show a screeshot?
Any last log entries?
Ill have to wait for a backup to run so I can get a screenshot for you of the duplicate issue.
Yes restoring of single archives. for example I only want to restore duplicate or nextcloud etc. Currently if you want to do only a particular application/docker archive you need to extract the tar, stop and replace things manually.Looking forward to the merge and release. I would class this plugin as one of unraid's core utilities and its importance is high in the community. I have setup multiple unraid servers for friends and family and its always first on my list of must have things to be installed and configured.
Currently I'm using it in conjunction with duplicate for encrypted remote backups between a few different unraid servers, pre-request of my time to help them setup unraid etc and way cheaper than a google drive etc.
Being able to break backups apart into single archives without having to rely on post script extraction saves on ssd and hdd io and life. Per docker container / folder would make upload and restoring much easier and faster for example doing a restore from remote having to pull a full 80+gb single backup file can take a very long time and is very susceptible to interruption over only a 2 mb's line for example. -
On 9/22/2022 at 4:20 PM, lytener said:
Did you ever fix this issue @IronBeardKnight? I'm running into the same issue.
Sorry no
Repository: binhex/arch-qbittorrentvpn is the repo i still pull from at the moment.
-
I might have run into another issue as well. it seems that when running on a scheduale it will split the backup into two files or 3 some times causing duplication of taken space.
I have not been able to figure out what is causing this but my hunch is that it does this when it fills up one disk and has to move to the next or if a move runs on the cache.
I have tried direct to array and also to cache first but always duplicate .tar files -
10 hours ago, KluthR said:
I packed all things to an experimental/unofficial plg, which is simply an update. I dont know if its the best option to publish it here - so: If anyone wants to test ALL my changes, please PM me.
So far:
- Fixed tar error detection during backup
- Improve backuplog format
- Option to create separate backup archives
- Option to hide Docker warning message box
- Check docker start result and wait 2 seconds between each start/stop operation (because of the: "failed to set IPv6 gateway" issue - which still needs some interperation of a docker guru)
Amazing work mate!
Are you working on separate restore options also ?
Can we expect you to merge to original master branch or create your own to be added to Community Applications ?
These changes I have been anticipating an am happy to do some testing if need be. -
This does not seem to be a profile specific issue from my end it seems like a bug to me or incorrect usage of regex or something.
As I'm not allowed to have just one backup even with a custom profile.
[Support] selfhosters.net's Template Repository
in Docker Containers
Posted
Hey guys having this issue trying to get the container started have used the documentation and template to get the xml with MySQL db backend also using ChatGPT for some rough Gutenberg and having no luck as I keep getting the below.
text error warn system array login
at java.base/jdk.internal.util.xml.impl.Parser.ent(Parser.java:1994)
at java.base/jdk.internal.util.xml.impl.Parser.step(Parser.java:471)
at java.base/jdk.internal.util.xml.impl.ParserSAX.parse(ParserSAX.java:477)
at java.base/jdk.internal.util.xml.impl.ParserSAX.parse(ParserSAX.java:411)
at java.base/jdk.internal.util.xml.impl.ParserSAX.parse(ParserSAX.java:374)
at java.base/jdk.internal.util.xml.impl.SAXParserImpl.parse(SAXParserImpl.java:97)
at java.base/jdk.internal.util.xml.PropertiesDefaultHandler.load(PropertiesDefaultHandler.java:83)
... 19 more
2024-02-23 22:53:04 ERROR: Main method error - - SAXParseException (... < Config:46 < <gener:-1 < *:-1 < ... < Main:116 < ...)
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.RuntimeException: com.google.inject.CreationException: Unable to create injector, see the following errors:
1) [Guice/ErrorInjectingConstructor]: RuntimeException: Configuration file is not a valid XML document
at Config.<init>(Config.java:42)
at MainModule.configure(MainModule.java:116)
while locating Config
Learn more:
https://github.com/google/guice/wiki/ERROR_INJECTING_CONSTRUCTOR
1 error
======================
Full classname legend:
======================
Config: "org.traccar.config.Config"
MainModule: "org.traccar.MainModule"
========================
End of classname legend:
========================
at org.traccar.Main.run(Main.java:146)
at org.traccar.Main.main(Main.java:110)
Caused by: com.google.inject.CreationException: Unable to create injector, see the following errors:
1) [Guice/ErrorInjectingConstructor]: RuntimeException: Configuration file is not a valid XML document
at Config.<init>(Config.java:42)
at MainModule.configure(MainModule.java:116)
while locating Config
Learn more:
https://github.com/google/guice/wiki/ERROR_INJECTING_CONSTRUCTOR
1 error
======================
Full classname legend:
======================
Config: "org.traccar.config.Config"
MainModule: "org.traccar.MainModule"
========================
End of classname legend:
========================
at com.google.inject.internal.Errors.throwCreationExceptionIfErrorsExist(Errors.java:589)
at com.google.inject.internal.InternalInjectorCreator.injectDynamically(InternalInjectorCreator.java:190)
at com.google.inject.internal.InternalInjectorCreator.build(InternalInjectorCreator.java:113)
at com.google.inject.Guice.createInjector(Guice.java:87)
at com.google.inject.Guice.createInjector(Guice.java:69)
at com.google.inject.Guice.createInjector(Guice.java:59)
at org.traccar.Main.run(Main.java:116)
... 1 more
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Configuration file is not a valid XML document
at org.traccar.config.Config.<init>(Config.java:64)
at org.traccar.config.Config$$FastClassByGuice$$9a3fc4.GUICE$TRAMPOLINE(<generated>)
at org.traccar.config.Config$$FastClassByGuice$$9a3fc4.apply(<generated>)
at com.google.inject.internal.DefaultConstructionProxyFactory$FastClassProxy.newInstance(DefaultConstructionProxyFactory.java:82)
at com.google.inject.internal.ConstructorInjector.provision(ConstructorInjector.java:114)
at com.google.inject.internal.ConstructorInjector.construct(ConstructorInjector.java:91)
at com.google.inject.internal.ConstructorBindingImpl$Factory.get(ConstructorBindingImpl.java:300)
at com.google.inject.internal.ProviderToInternalFactoryAdapter.get(ProviderToInternalFactoryAdapter.java:40)
at com.google.inject.internal.SingletonScope$1.get(SingletonScope.java:169)
at com.google.inject.internal.InternalFactoryToProviderAdapter.get(InternalFactoryToProviderAdapter.java:45)
at com.google.inject.internal.InternalInjectorCreator.loadEagerSingletons(InternalInjectorCreator.java:213)
at com.google.inject.internal.InternalInjectorCreator.injectDynamically(InternalInjectorCreator.java:186)
... 6 more
Caused by: java.util.InvalidPropertiesFormatException: jdk.internal.org.xml.sax.SAXParseException;
at java.base/jdk.internal.util.xml.PropertiesDefaultHandler.load(PropertiesDefaultHandler.java:85)
at java.base/java.util.Properties.loadFromXML(Properties.java:986)
at org.traccar.config.Config.<init>(Config.java:46)
... 17 more
Caused by: jdk.internal.org.xml.sax.SAXParseException;
at java.base/jdk.internal.util.xml.impl.ParserSAX.panic(ParserSAX.java:652)
at java.base/jdk.internal.util.xml.impl.Parser.ent(Parser.java:1994)
at java.base/jdk.internal.util.xml.impl.Parser.step(Parser.java:471)
at java.base/jdk.internal.util.xml.impl.ParserSAX.parse(ParserSAX.java:477)
at java.base/jdk.internal.util.xml.impl.ParserSAX.parse(ParserSAX.java:411)
at java.base/jdk.internal.util.xml.impl.ParserSAX.parse(ParserSAX.java:374)
at java.base/jdk.internal.util.xml.impl.SAXParserImpl.parse(SAXParserImpl.java:97)
at java.base/jdk.internal.util.xml.PropertiesDefaultHandler.load(PropertiesDefaultHandler.java:83)
... 19 more