February 4, 201115 yr Great all my share is visible in my W7 I'm glad that worked out for you. It also explains why my shares worked off the bat as I came from a 5.0 beta 2 setup and did not need to invoke the newperms script. However, it seems as others have reported, there's an issue with invoking the NewPerms script via the webGui.
February 4, 201115 yr I also try to add AFP to one of may shares to use it with the timemachine, but I got the same issue I have with NFS. The webinteface just die after enable AFP to a share. I remove the timemachine.cfg from/boot/config/shares and restart with /usr/local/sbin/emhttp & So we will see if the NFS and AFP is fixed in beta 4
February 4, 201115 yr TimeMachine appears to be working well, just running a first backup now. May I ask how you were setting this up? I have a TimeMachine share with 3 backup files for the respective Mac's from my previous 4.7 installation including TM support. This is the well known HOWTO: http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=4521.0) With 5.0-Beta3 I exported this same share via AFP (TM enabled) as Private and gave read/write permission for all 3 users. The issue is that the TM volume is not showing up on the desktop, hence TM volume is not accessible. Maybe the usage us /usr/local/sbin/newperms is also helping to get TimeMachine running (Invoking the script from the webinterface wasn't working for me either by the way). Overall I´m getting full access to all files on my unRAID server - with AFP and with SMB and from Mac OSX as well as from my Win7 (under VMWare Fusion). But TM and NFS are the only things not working for me. Let's see if newperms is doing the trick. So a big THANK YOU for the great job around serving the Mac OSX community with AFP The end user interface is just great.
February 4, 201115 yr When I set up a share and on the Included disk(s): I set disk8, but the share shows up on my disk3 ? what can cause that?
February 4, 201115 yr I don't want to hold up -beta4, but would like to mention that there is an update to SCST (to v2.0.0.1) in mid January, that purports to deal with certain crashes and performance issues. (Announcement here with download link.) I found this while trying to research some of the system crashes or hangs I've noticed, whose common factor was the mvsas/SCST modules (used by the 1430's I believe?). I've also seen some reporting that with the kernel v2.6.37, they are finally seeing error-free operation with cards requiring the mvsas/SCST modules.
February 4, 201115 yr Author I don't want to hold up -beta4, but would like to mention that there is an update to SCST (to v2.0.0.1) in mid January, that purports to deal with certain crashes and performance issues. (Announcement here with download link.) I found this while trying to research some of the system crashes or hangs I've noticed, whose common factor was the mvsas/SCST modules (used by the 1430's I believe?). I've also seen some reporting that with the kernel v2.6.37, they are finally seeing error-free operation with cards requiring the mvsas/SCST modules. I'm no longer using SCST.
February 4, 201115 yr I don't want to hold up -beta4, but would like to mention that there is an update to SCST (to v2.0.0.1) in mid January, that purports to deal with certain crashes and performance issues. (Announcement here with download link.) I found this while trying to research some of the system crashes or hangs I've noticed, whose common factor was the mvsas/SCST modules (used by the 1430's I believe?). I've also seen some reporting that with the kernel v2.6.37, they are finally seeing error-free operation with cards requiring the mvsas/SCST modules. I'm no longer using SCST. Thank you!!! SCST makes a mess of the syslog!
February 4, 201115 yr RobJ... I'm linking to this page: http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=6806.msg102381#msg102381 where you state that if any of your drives on 4.7 have HPA, they need to be removed.. I'm just thinking.. I believe the 2 drives I have that aren't being detected by 5.0-beta3 (but work fine in beta2) have HPA enabled. Would this be a cause for it? Should I be following the procedure listed to use the HDAT2 tool to wipe the HPA partition? Best,
February 5, 201115 yr Author RobJ... I'm linking to this page: http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=6806.msg102381#msg102381 where you state that if any of your drives on 4.7 have HPA, they need to be removed.. I'm just thinking.. I believe the 2 drives I have that aren't being detected by 5.0-beta3 (but work fine in beta2) have HPA enabled. Would this be a cause for it? Should I be following the procedure listed to use the HDAT2 tool to wipe the HPA partition? Best, HPA has nothing to do with it. This issue is fixed in -beta4.
February 5, 201115 yr Author When I set up a share and on the Included disk(s): I set disk8, but the share shows up on my disk3 ? what can cause that? A bug which has been fixed in -beta4 can cause that
February 5, 201115 yr I'm linking to this page: http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=6806.msg102381#msg102381 where you state that if any of your drives on 4.7 have HPA, they need to be removed.. I'm just thinking.. I believe the 2 drives I have that aren't being detected by 5.0-beta3 (but work fine in beta2) have HPA enabled. Would this be a cause for it? Should I be following the procedure listed to use the HDAT2 tool to wipe the HPA partition? I should not have been so definitive about that, as obviously I have not seen every upgrading user's syslog. I modified that statement to indicate that it depends on whether unRAID v4.7 complains about any drives being the wrong size. Although we have heard from a few with the Gigabyte HPA that were reported to be the wrong size, we don't know if others had an HPA but had no problems on upgrading. In your situation, I really don't know as you have not reported any HPA, as far as I know. Plus, an HPA would not 'hide' a drive, just possibly cause it to appear the wrong size. I searched but did not find any syslogs posted by you, and that is the most important thing you can provide. I believe that somewhere you may have mentioned that on different boots you would get a different set of drives appear? If that is true, it would be useful to see multiple syslogs, that show differing drive sets. But this should be moved to a separate thread ... Edit: I think we will find that as Tom said, you are suffering from the same issue as others here, fixed in -beta4.
February 5, 201115 yr Try the following command, it will take a while to finish. /usr/local/sbin/newperms It should also be noted that there's still a slight issue if it's invoked directly on a share or file with a space in the name. The fix is to place double-quotes "" around $1 on line 11 as such: if [ -e "$1" ] ; then Worked great for me too, had some share problems with some of my PCs but not others, this has sorted it all out. EDIT: Created a new folder in my Movies share with my Windows 7 desktop, but was unable to access it on any of the other PCs on my network. Rerunning usr/local/sbin/newperms fixed the issue. Very much looking forward to the next beta release and eventually the stable version 5,
February 6, 201115 yr Yes, it has been replaced. To go to sleep, the following worked on my server echo -n mem >/sys/power/state Of course, I've never been able to wake it up, but I've always been able to put it to sleep. I can confirm that S3 is working on my server with the command Joe stated above,tested 2 times. //Peter I want to say that my suspend an waking have been working great during the last week, using this script s3_notHrHdTcpIp.sh
February 6, 201115 yr I am using AFP and have a share with two users assigned. One user with read/write and one user with only read permissions. I had to run the newperms script manually since it did not work from the gui. All files and folders now have user:group nobody:users and folder permissions are set to drwxr-xr-x and file permissions seem to be all over the place - some have -rw-rw---- others have -rw-rwS---. From the Finder I am no longer able to change folder names or file names, nor can I delete folders or files. Has anyone else had this problem? Samba works correctly: I can both change and delete files/folders.
February 6, 201115 yr I also try to add AFP to one of may shares to use it with the timemachine, but I got the same issue I have with NFS. The webinteface just die after enable AFP to a share. I remove the timemachine.cfg from/boot/config/shares and restart with /usr/local/sbin/emhttp & So we will see if the NFS and AFP is fixed in beta 4 Update, the AFP is OK on my share, using (Timemachine option) but the issue is when using NFS, the web interface die, but that is perhaps solved in the new beta-4, that I hopefully will be available later today EDIT Time Machine finds the share, and is doing a backup right now. EDIT 2 Some thing is not working with TM, it was started and now it's stopped on "Calculating changes..." See attached file ( latest rows from my syslog) I didn't have so my patience now it starting back up my files //Peter //Peter syslog-AFP-TM.txt
February 6, 201115 yr Yes, it has been replaced. To go to sleep, the following worked on my server echo -n mem >/sys/power/state Of course, I've never been able to wake it up, but I've always been able to put it to sleep. I can confirm that S3 is working on my server with the command Joe stated above,tested 2 times. //Peter I want to say that my suspend an waking have been working great during the last week, using this script s3_notHrHdTcpIp.sh Where can I download the s3_notHrHdTcpIp.sh script?
February 6, 201115 yr You can try the search function on this forum, perhaps you can find it then If not, let me know. You find it here -> http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=3657.msg49147#msg49147 //Peter
February 6, 201115 yr Yes, it has been replaced. To go to sleep, the following worked on my server echo -n mem >/sys/power/state Of course, I've never been able to wake it up, but I've always been able to put it to sleep. I can confirm that S3 is working on my server with the command Joe stated above,tested 2 times. //Peter I want to say that my suspend an waking have been working great during the last week, using this script s3_notHrHdTcpIp.sh I can't get sleep working with the new comand but then again I couldn't get it working with the old one. Finally discovered s2ram and installed it and all is working perfectly. Just need to get a script together now to automate it all. Peter is there a chance you could upload yours so I could have a look please, I'd really appreciate it if you gave me some directions on how to use it too. EDIT: Just seen your post above!!! Ignore me, sorry! ATB Neil PS. Am I the only one finding the interface with 5.0b3, especially when using unMENU, a lot more responsive.
February 6, 201115 yr If you have installed the s2-ram , then you need to change the script Replace echo -n 3 > /proc/acpi/sleep or echo -n mem >/sys/power/state with /boot/custom/bin/s2ram -f -p -m You perhaps need to change the folder to where you have installed the s2-ram More info here -> http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=3657.msg50365#msg50365 And add the below line to your go file, but remember to change your path to the script /boot/custom/bin/s3_notHrHdTcpIp.sh & #| at now + 1 minute
February 6, 201115 yr @TOM Is there any chance that we can see function from the S3 script built in to V5 so all changes/modification can be done from the GUI
February 6, 201115 yr @TOM Is there any chance that we can see function from the S3 script built in to V5 so all changes/modification can be done from the GUI Doubtful.... I think there are a lot of hardware dependencies.
February 6, 201115 yr @JOE and TOM Joe, the 2 below excellent scripts, can these be invoked in version 5 in a different way its now, (starting from the go file) But I don't know if they are working in V5, did these scripts perhaps be modified to work on V5 ? Great if these function/settings also could be made fro the GUI the goal must be that all settings in all script is done from the GUI, so we don't need working from the promt, it would be so much more user friendly. spinup_when_accessed -> http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=4858.0 cache_dirs -> http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=4500.0 //Peter
February 6, 201115 yr There is update on the WIKI regarding beta-4, so it just a small matter of time before we can do more testing for tom
February 6, 201115 yr There is update on the WIKI regarding beta-4, so it just a small matter of time before we can do more testing for tom Interesting.. Didn't notice that. Odd that the page is available before the actual release.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.