howdy - got a fun one! 

 

Issue:

Upon restart, I noticed that a Clear operation had started automatically on my Cache disk which was also moved into my array in the last position (Disk 22). I reassigned the SSD to the Cache drive in "Pools" and formatted it as it was unmountable.

 

The same thing happened again this morning upon boot.

 

Weird things I noted that I'm not sure matter but may help ¯\_(ツ)_/¯:

• While initially setting up the cache drive, I noticed there was no "cache devices" section. I chose to click "Add Pool" and noticed that the default name was "cache," and took that as my cue.
• I was having difficulty with Macinabox (script confirming VM was ready but not appearing in VM menu). I initiated an install 3 times using Macinabox, then restarted. This issue first happened on the boot of this restart.
• Repeated this issue the morning after. I had only the plex docker installed and the server had been off overnight.
• The SSD is an m.2 in the motherboard slot that shares bandwidth with the 1st sata port (I *believe* this is the port that my parity drive is using)

 

iss-diagnostics-20210127-0843.zip

iss-diagnostics-reconfigured.zip

Edited January 27, 20215 yr by starwak3
reformatted and reassigned cache drive and posted diagnostics again

This is a strange one, re-assign cache, grab diags before rebooting, then reboot in safe mode, if it happens again grab new diags and post both.

15 minutes ago, JorgeB said:

This is a strange one, re-assign cache, grab diags before rebooting, then reboot in safe mode, if it happens again grab new diags and post both.

haha - I'm new to UNRAID but got the feeling this was actually a strange one. thanks for the quick reply.

 

it did happen again. diags attached.

iss-diagnostics-20210127-1213-BEFORE.zip iss-diagnostics-20210127-1222-AFTER(safe).zip

Looks like it still thinks that disk is assigned as disk22. Did you actually New Config and rebuild parity without the disk before you tried to use it as cache?

It wasn't assigned before rebooting, looks like the clear was canceled, so it was never really assigned to the array, I have no idea what could cause this, never seen it before, best to create a bug report, add both diags again.

1 hour ago, trurl said:

Looks like it still thinks that disk is assigned as disk22. Did you actually New Config and rebuild parity without the disk before you tried to use it as cache?

I did not make a new config and rebuild parity without the new cache disk. I followed spaceinvaderone's tutorial and that wasn't mentioned. "New Config" is foreign to me - could you please elaborate? If by "rebuild parity" you mean performing a parity check then I understand that part.

 

EDIT: I looked in Tools and of course New Config is there (duh - my bad). Do you suggest doing this and a parity check?

 

49 minutes ago, JorgeB said:

It wasn't assigned before rebooting, looks like the clear was canceled, so it was never really assigned to the array, I have no idea what could cause this, never seen it before, best to create a bug report, add both diags again.

whacky - alright then. I'll do that, unless you think that trurl's question opens up a different angle of attack here.

Also, I'm curious if you have any comments regarding this part of my original post (quoted below).

Thanks so much for your help, JorgeB

 

2 hours ago, starwak3 said:

...

• While initially setting up the cache drive, I noticed there was no "cache devices" section. I chose to click "Add Pool" and noticed that the default name was "cache," and took that as my cue.

...

 

Edited January 27, 20215 yr by starwak3
corrected username "turl" to "trurl"

2 hours ago, starwak3 said:

I did not make a new config and rebuild parity without the new cache disk.

It's not "without the new cache disk" I was talking about, it's with no disk assigned as disk22. When you remove a disk from the parity array you must rebuild parity.

 

But

2 hours ago, JorgeB said:

it was never really assigned to the array

I agree it shouldn't be considered assigned until it has been cleared, but I've never tested that myself. I don't doubt @JorgeB has test that though 😁

7 minutes ago, trurl said:

It's not "without the new cache disk" I was talking about, it's with no disk assigned as disk22...

now I understand what you were getting at. I thought you were asking it as a prep-question inferring that I missed a step.

 

As of now, I have let the m.2 disk fully clear and removed it physically from the motherboard. Parity check / data-rebuild is underway. Once completed, my plan is to give it another go using the other m.2 slot. Hoping that, or just the chance of a second try will do the trick. I will also submit the bug report.

 

Here goes nothin' - thank you both again!

1 hour ago, starwak3 said:

Parity check / data-rebuild is underway.

I'm confused. Could you please post a screenshot of the Main tab in the GUI?

32 minutes ago, jonathanm said:

I'm confused. Could you please post a screenshot of the Main tab in the GUI?

we meet again - here you go

10 minutes ago, starwak3 said:

here you go

Confusion averted. When you said...

2 hours ago, starwak3 said:

Parity check / data-rebuild is underway.

I was concerned that things weren't going as planned.

I see it's actually a Parity Sync, which is proper.

29 minutes ago, jonathanm said:

Confusion averted. When you said...

I was concerned that things weren't going as planned.

I see it's actually a Parity Sync, which is proper.

Woah! I posted that quick as I was heading off to a huge plate of sushi - my bad. Regardless, I'm reassured that you checked in. Thank you. (weird bug huh?)

Unrelated but for best performance I would use on the non SMR disks (EFRX) for parity, of course it will only make a difference when writing to a non SMR disk also, but like that it can be slower even when writing to one.