Enable MMC support in kernel


Recommended Posts

I'm running Unraid on a QNAP TS-451A which includes a SD card reader. The kernel in Unraid 6.8.3 and 3.9.0-rc2 doesn't seem to include the relevant kernel configuration.

 

See for example: https://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/How_to_get_the_internal_SD_card_working

 

The Unraid kernel config doesn't have this enabled: # CONFIG_MMC is not set

 

I'd like to use the SD card slot for a (mostly) read-only storage for Docker container configuration files and such with a high endurance SD card. Currently, SD cards aren't detected at all.

 

root@Tower:~# lspci
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Atom/Celeron/Pentium Processor x5-E8000/J3xxx/N3xxx Series SoC Transaction Register (rev 35)
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Atom/Celeron/Pentium Processor x5-E8000/J3xxx/N3xxx Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 35)
00:10.0 SD Host controller: Intel Corporation Atom/Celeron/Pentium Processor x5-E8000/J3xxx/N3xxx Series MMC Controller (rev 35)
00:13.0 SATA controller: Intel Corporation Atom/Celeron/Pentium Processor x5-E8000/J3xxx/N3xxx Series SATA Controller (rev 35)
00:14.0 USB controller: Intel Corporation Atom/Celeron/Pentium Processor x5-E8000/J3xxx/N3xxx Series USB xHCI Controller (rev 35)
00:1a.0 Encryption controller: Intel Corporation Atom/Celeron/Pentium Processor x5-E8000/J3xxx/N3xxx Series Trusted Execution Engine (rev 35)
00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation Atom/Celeron/Pentium Processor x5-E8000/J3xxx/N3xxx Series High Definition Audio Controller (rev 35)
00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Atom/Celeron/Pentium Processor x5-E8000/J3xxx/N3xxx Series PCI Express Port #1 (rev 35)
00:1c.2 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Atom/Celeron/Pentium Processor x5-E8000/J3xxx/N3xxx Series PCI Express Port #3 (rev 35)
00:1c.3 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Atom/Celeron/Pentium Processor x5-E8000/J3xxx/N3xxx Series PCI Express Port #4 (rev 35)
00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation Atom/Celeron/Pentium Processor x5-E8000/J3xxx/N3xxx Series PCU (rev 35)
00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corporation Atom/Celeron/Pentium Processor x5-E8000/J3xxx/N3xxx SMBus Controller (rev 35)
01:00.0 SATA controller: ASMedia Technology Inc. Device 0625 (rev 01)
02:00.0 PCI bridge: ASMedia Technology Inc. Device 1182
03:03.0 PCI bridge: ASMedia Technology Inc. Device 1182
03:07.0 PCI bridge: ASMedia Technology Inc. Device 1182
04:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 06)
05:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 06)
06:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 06)

 

Link to comment
4 hours ago, jonathanm said:

Speculation here, but I think the reason it is excluded is so that the slots don't get detected as drives and count against the license limit.

 

 

That does make sense, as the TS-451A does include an eMMC module that is used for installing the official QNAP firmware. That would indeed be detected as a drive when the MMC module is available. Maybe it could be built but blacklisted in a way that the user can remove the blacklist entry if they want to use it? I don't mind paying extra for the included eMMC that I wouldn't use. An empty SD slot shouldn't count towards the drive count, as far as I know Linux only shows a block device for the slot if something is in there.

Edited by Strayer
typo
Link to comment
  • 10 months later...

I also would like this.  I have a pocket sized PC.  8GB Ram, 256GB eMMC, 1TB NVMe, Quad Core 2+GHz CPU.   I have a small 8GB Flash drive I use for Unraid, and have the NVMe for my storage drive.  I would like to use the 256GB eMMC drive for storage of ISO files.  ISOs take a LOT of space, but are rarely used, so having them on eMMC is not going to hurt my performance, and would be a better utilization of my available storage.

 

Unattached drives can't see the space due to lack of Kernel drivers for the eMMC.  With my setup, I am not going to be having an issue with Licensing the number of drives I have in the system.

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.