tjb_altf4 Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 7 minutes ago, ich777 said: I hear about this the first time I think? Where did you notice the '/bin/bash: line 33 [: ==: unary operator expected' what Plugins have you installed? What process is stuck at 100%? Process @ 100% is an unrelated, existing issue. Of yours, I have NVIDIA, Mellanox, DVB & iSCSI (both actually). Had not see the error in 6.9-rc2 previously. Quote Link to comment
ich777 Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 1 minute ago, tjb_altf4 said: Of yours, I have NVIDIA, Mellanox, DVB & iSCSI (both actually). Had not see the error in 6.9-rc2 previously. The Plugins are now all built and it's save to upgrade to 6.9.0 without loosing a Plugin because the packages wasn't built. 2 Quote Link to comment
hawihoney Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 (edited) 4 hours ago, BVD said: It sounds like your config might've pointed the appdata folder to another location (other than standard), and that config information was wiped. I do have two system/appdata folders. One on an unassigned device and one on an array device. The system share is set to "Use cache=No". E.g.: /mnt/disk17/system/ /mnt/disks/NVMe1/system/ VMs are running on array, Dockers are split between both. Docker/VM settings are set to: /mnt/disk17/system/docker.img /mnt/disk17/system/libvirt.img Should I expect problems? Edited March 2, 2021 by hawihoney Quote Link to comment
Arragon Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 After updating to 6.9.0 all my user shares are gone. /mnt looks like this d--------- 1 root root 0 Jan 1 1970 user/ and I can't change permission on that # chmod 1777 /mnt/user chmod: changing permissions of '/mnt/user': No such file or directory Quote Link to comment
SavellM Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 How come there is not notes of Soon? Quote Link to comment
deadnote Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 Update worked fine on HP Proliant Gen 8 Thanks 1 1 Quote Link to comment
SimonF Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 (edited) Upgraded Test system. Was this meant to be changed? sed -i 's/1000/3000/' /usr/local/emhttp/plugins/dynamix/include/Syslog.php Edited March 2, 2021 by SimonF Quote Link to comment
S80_UK Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 (edited) Updated main server OK last night, but on restart had I five notifications that each of my drives that was above my 85% utilisation of capacity threshold were now back at "Normal" utilisation along with the accompanying emails. Obviously this is not a critical issue - maybe a consequence of the fact that I don't use the default thresholds? Nonetheless, the update is much appreciated. Will look to update backup server shortly. Edit: Backup also updated. No spurious notifications, but that server is using default capacity thresholds. Edited March 2, 2021 by S80_UK Updated 1 Quote Link to comment
RikStigter Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 (edited) Updates HP Proliant Microserver gen 8 with Xenon E3-1260L, 16GB Ram BX500 500GB cache-drive and 4*4TB WD-Red's no problem! Nice going! Edited March 2, 2021 by RikStigter 1 Quote Link to comment
SimonF Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 (edited) 2 hours ago, tjb_altf4 said: '/bin/bash: line 33 [: ==: unary operator expected' what Plugins have you installed? @ich777, I think this is my plugin, will review. It appears on the console, Looks like I also need to suppress modinfo message in USBIP one also. Fixed /bin/bash line 33 error. Edited March 2, 2021 by SimonF Quote Link to comment
vityatsoi Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 (edited) hi all! thanks for the new version but i seem to have a problem. upgraded, pressed reboot and it's been almost 2 hours. is it normal? i have a pretty powerful cpu. can i shut down manually at least or what? Edited March 2, 2021 by vityatsoi Quote Link to comment
Mixim Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 Updated my HP DL380 G8 from 6.9 RC2 to 6.9.0 stable, no issues at all. A mix of SAS and SATA disks, one additional (Raid1) pool, two unassigned devices. Running docker, multiple VMs. There was heavy disk and CPU usage (~80% total utilisation on dual 6 core HT Xeons) after start-up, but things settled down to normal levels after a few minutes. Thank you for the wonderful work. Quote Link to comment
ich777 Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 44 minutes ago, SimonF said: @ich777, I think this is my plugin, will review. It appears on the console, Looks like I also need to suppress modinfo message in USBIP one also. What was the error? The package was built successful because I checked the contents and everything is in there... Quote Link to comment
SimonF Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 14 minutes ago, ich777 said: What was the error? The package was built successful because I checked the contents and everything is in there... Nothing wrong with packages, its was a check in my .plg script against a variable that didn't exist, and didnt need to be there Copy and paste moment 😉 1 Quote Link to comment
mgrx Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 I've just updated, and i get a noVNC error on every vm i try to access using the integrated vnc client: Quote noVNC encountered an error: Uncaught SyntaxError: The requested module '../core/util/browser.js' does not provide an export named 'hasScrollbarGutter' http://192.168.1.100/plugins/dynamix.vm.manager/novnc/app/ui.js?ts=20200718:11:35 SyntaxError: The requested module '../core/util/browser.js' does not provide an export named 'hasScrollbarGutter' 1 1 Quote Link to comment
Pixel5 Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 when i spin up all drives i get this error under 6.9 Stable only two drives spin up the others stay spun down, all drives are connected to the same backplane going to an HBA. Mar 2 12:10:32 TheVault emhttpd: Spinning up all drives... Mar 2 12:10:32 TheVault emhttpd: spinning up /dev/sdg Mar 2 12:10:32 TheVault emhttpd: spinning up /dev/sdd Mar 2 12:10:32 TheVault emhttpd: spinning up /dev/sde Mar 2 12:10:32 TheVault emhttpd: spinning up /dev/sdf Mar 2 12:10:48 TheVault kernel: sd 1:0:3:0: attempting task abort!scmd(0x00000000d857461f), outstanding for 15523 ms & timeout 15000 ms Mar 2 12:10:48 TheVault kernel: sd 1:0:3:0: [sdg] tag#1783 CDB: opcode=0x85 85 06 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 40 e3 00 Mar 2 12:10:48 TheVault kernel: scsi target1:0:3: handle(0x000c), sas_address(0x4433221103000000), phy(3) Mar 2 12:10:48 TheVault kernel: scsi target1:0:3: enclosure logical id(0x500605b00daaefd0), slot(1) Mar 2 12:10:48 TheVault kernel: scsi target1:0:3: enclosure level(0x0000), connector name( ) Mar 2 12:10:50 TheVault kernel: sd 1:0:3:0: task abort: SUCCESS scmd(0x00000000d857461f) Mar 2 12:10:50 TheVault kernel: sd 1:0:0:0: attempting task abort!scmd(0x0000000054158672), outstanding for 17520 ms & timeout 15000 ms Mar 2 12:10:50 TheVault kernel: sd 1:0:0:0: [sdd] tag#283 CDB: opcode=0x85 85 06 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 40 e3 00 Mar 2 12:10:50 TheVault kernel: scsi target1:0:0: handle(0x0009), sas_address(0x4433221100000000), phy(0) Mar 2 12:10:50 TheVault kernel: scsi target1:0:0: enclosure logical id(0x500605b00daaefd0), slot(3) Mar 2 12:10:50 TheVault kernel: scsi target1:0:0: enclosure level(0x0000), connector name( ) Mar 2 12:10:51 TheVault emhttpd: read SMART /dev/nvme1n1 Mar 2 12:10:51 TheVault emhttpd: read SMART /dev/sde Mar 2 12:10:51 TheVault emhttpd: read SMART /dev/sdb Mar 2 12:10:51 TheVault emhttpd: read SMART /dev/sdf Mar 2 12:10:51 TheVault emhttpd: read SMART /dev/sdc Mar 2 12:10:51 TheVault kernel: sd 1:0:0:0: task abort: SUCCESS scmd(0x0000000054158672) Mar 2 12:10:51 TheVault emhttpd: read SMART /dev/nvme0n1 Mar 2 12:10:51 TheVault emhttpd: read SMART /dev/sda Quote Link to comment
John_M Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 2 hours ago, SimonF said: Upgraded Test system. Was this meant to be changed? sed -i 's/1000/3000/' /usr/local/emhttp/plugins/dynamix/include/Syslog.php It looks like it's still needed. Otherwise, an uneventful upgrade. Thanks. Quote Link to comment
pervel Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 Is it necessary to upgrade if you're on 6.9.0-rc2? Has anything changed? Quote Link to comment
Mixim Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 (edited) 38 minutes ago, mgrx said: I've just updated, and i get a noVNC error on every vm i try to access using the integrated vnc client: I had this issue when I upgraded from 6.8 to 6.8 RC2. Clearing the web browser cache (i.e. Edge) cured it for me. Edited March 2, 2021 by Mixim added more details 4 Quote Link to comment
vityatsoi Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 (edited) 1 hour ago, vityatsoi said: i seem to have a problem. upgraded, pressed reboot and it's been almost 2 hours. well as it turns out, after upgrading, ipv4 of my unraid changed and it was booting alright but i kept opening old page) ta-dah) Edited March 2, 2021 by vityatsoi 1 Quote Link to comment
SimonF Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 16 minutes ago, pervel said: Is it necessary to upgrade if you're on 6.9.0-rc2? Has anything changed? The kernel is latest 5.10 release before 5.11 Quote Link to comment
SimonF Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 26 minutes ago, Pixel5 said: task abort: SUCCESS scmd I get a similar message for my SAS Parity drive when I connect a USB stick, but for me Spin ups and down work fine. I have created new bug report for 6.9.0 for my issue. Suggest you do the same for yours. 1 Quote Link to comment
mgrx Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 1 hour ago, Mixim said: I had this issue when I upgraded from 6.8 to 6.8 RC2. Clearing the web browser cache (i.e. Edge) cured it for me. Cheers, that was too easy, should have thought about that myself. Worked like a charm. Thank you mate! 1 Quote Link to comment
itimpi Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 1 hour ago, tzotz said: Dear unRaid help, I installed the new version as described (both via the plugin install (see below) and via the tools->update OS) the installation completed successfully for all I can tell but rebooting the system still says "version 6.8.3", why is that? according to the screenshot the update failed but it gives no indication as to why Quote Link to comment
itimpi Posted March 2, 2021 Share Posted March 2, 2021 1 hour ago, mgrx said: I've just updated, and i get a noVNC error on every vm i try to access using the integrated vnc client: Have you cleared the browsers cache? I seem to remember this being the fix for such an issue in the past. 1 Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.