topcat989 Posted December 1, 2007 Share Posted December 1, 2007 http://www.itnews.com.au/News/NewsStory.aspx?story=65976 wow. I guess file system updates will be a little harder to come by. Link to comment
parsec Posted December 1, 2007 Share Posted December 1, 2007 Maybe he should have had a general roll-back feature, or a safer delete procedure that leaves no restorable data. Af of the reiserFS, he should have lots of time for further development. /Rene Link to comment
Stokkes Posted December 1, 2007 Share Posted December 1, 2007 I doubt the development or updates to ReiserFS will be hampered.. Well, come to think of it, most linux distributions still use Reiser3 (Reiser4 isn't "officially" completed yet) and even then, it's a mature FS that'd been around for a while. On a side note, Reiser is really optimized for a lot of small files, and I'll just plug that for media storage servers like unRaid is trying to be, we need a better FS..... I don't believe Reiser handles big files as well as say, ext3. Link to comment
NLS Posted December 16, 2007 Share Posted December 16, 2007 Now that you mention it, could the developer (of unRAID of course) let us know why he came up with reiser and not ext3? Link to comment
parsec Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=283.0 /Rene Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.