Hello

 

I have a bunch of media shares on my UNRAID server and tried copying a 10GB+ file to a W11 VM on the same UNRAID server.

The virtio NIC on the W11 VM is running at 10gbps but I cannot copy from the UNRAID shares any faster than 200MB/s approx 2gbps.

My physical NIC on the UNRAID server is a 2.5gbps onboard adaptor, is this the limiting factor? Is it possible to create a seperate virtual 10gb network so that VMs and shares on the same UNRAID server can copy at the full 10gbps speed available?

 

Just to add, all shares and VMS are on nvme/ssd drives (seperate).

Edited July 30, 20223 yr by mikeyosm

It is know issue.

 

10 hours ago, mikeyosm said:

My physical NIC on the UNRAID server is a 2.5gbps onboard adaptor, is this the limiting factor?

Not related.

3 hours ago, Vr2Io said:

It is know issue.

 

Not related.

How about enabling smb multichannel will that help? What is the known issue exactly?

I couldnt call it a "known issue" per se, just that achieving full 10Gb throughput almost always takes some tuning.

 

10Gb is a whole other can of worms, and achieving that level of throughput requires both careful planning, and a decent amount of optimization (both host and hypervisor side).

 

For one, you're far more likely to need to worry about your peak CPU frequency, context switching, and high interrupt counts. Beyond that, you're much more likely to encounter IO bottlenecks in "weird" (or at least previously unexpected) places. You'll have to start by determining where the bottleneck is. For instance, are you simply mounting an SMB share? Have you tested NFS to see if you get similar IO behavior? What about share passthrough in the VM config (this usually sucks)? Tried the virtio network driver instead of virtio-net? And so on and so on. Just changing things without at least having an inkling of where you're bottlenecking is a recipe for pain. 

 

I'd start by installing something like the netdata docker container; start it up, initiate your 10GB copy, and look for anything that appears to spike in the reported statistics. High IRQ remapping? Single core pegged at 100% utilization? What else does that core have going on if so? What's the reported disk utilization at that time?

 

Once you figure out what the bottleneck is, then you can start doing research on how to correct it; the solution will be unique to your configuration and the cause of the bottleneck, so just be prepared to do a little googling, and some trial and error along the way.

 

Happy hunting!

3 hours ago, BVD said:

I couldnt call it a "known issue" per se, just that achieving full 10Gb throughput almost always takes some tuning.

 

10Gb is a whole other can of worms, and achieving that level of throughput requires both careful planning, and a decent amount of optimization (both host and hypervisor side).

 

For one, you're far more likely to need to worry about your peak CPU frequency, context switching, and high interrupt counts. Beyond that, you're much more likely to encounter IO bottlenecks in "weird" (or at least previously unexpected) places. You'll have to start by determining where the bottleneck is. For instance, are you simply mounting an SMB share? Have you tested NFS to see if you get similar IO behavior? What about share passthrough in the VM config (this usually sucks)? Tried the virtio network driver instead of virtio-net? And so on and so on. Just changing things without at least having an inkling of where you're bottlenecking is a recipe for pain. 

 

I'd start by installing something like the netdata docker container; start it up, initiate your 10GB copy, and look for anything that appears to spike in the reported statistics. High IRQ remapping? Single core pegged at 100% utilization? What else does that core have going on if so? What's the reported disk utilization at that time?

 

Once you figure out what the bottleneck is, then you can start doing research on how to correct it; the solution will be unique to your configuration and the cause of the bottleneck, so just be prepared to do a little googling, and some trial and error along the way.

 

Happy hunting!

Some good tips, thanks. Switched from vitio-net to vitio and boom! avg 700MB/s - happy with that.

Glad to hear it, and happy to help!

 

As luck would have it, I'm actually working on some performance tuning for 40Gb this week, and the number of things that play into it are wild to think about. Things most would never think of like chip architecture, bios settings (NUMA, memory interleaving, etc), driver specific flags, and so on - super interesting stuff!

Also wanted to mention - if you ever decide you need that extra ~400MB/s or so (1.1GB/s being well within reason for a 10Gb connection), the above would still definitely apply - and the journey's most of the fun!!

Note to the future readers, it took me a few days to discover this.

 

Windows 11 loves "vitio" as the "Network Model"

 

Enjoy