gxs Posted September 24, 2022 Share Posted September 24, 2022 (edited) Hey I have a problem with the new version. After updating to 6.11 all my shares are invisible. Navigating to my servers IP shows me this folder is empty message. But when I navigate to a specific folder the shares are there. Basically: \\192.168.0.250 - no shares shown \\192.168.0.250\personal - opens folder normally How can I get my folders to show up? Edit: My phone also doesn't show the shares. No shares are set to Yes (Hidden). Edited September 24, 2022 by gxs Quote Link to comment
gxs Posted September 24, 2022 Author Share Posted September 24, 2022 It seems that something broke on the update. It doesn't like this setting anymore. access based share enum = yes Did something change? Quote Link to comment
ChatNoir Posted September 24, 2022 Share Posted September 24, 2022 Please attach your diagnostics to your next post. Quote Link to comment
JorgeB Posted September 24, 2022 Share Posted September 24, 2022 and the output of ls -la /mnt/user Quote Link to comment
BuTscH Posted September 24, 2022 Share Posted September 24, 2022 (edited) Greetings, I have since the 6.11 update exactly the same problem. Edited October 8, 2022 by BuTscH Quote Link to comment
Frank1940 Posted September 24, 2022 Share Posted September 24, 2022 I had a similiar problem, rebooted the client computer (Windows 10) and I got immediate access to the server. Quote Link to comment
gxs Posted October 8, 2022 Author Share Posted October 8, 2022 On 9/24/2022 at 3:47 PM, JorgeB said: and the output of ls -la /mnt/user root@Tower:~# ls -la /mnt/user total 1048596 drwxrwxrwx 1 nobody users 234 Oct 4 17:04 ./ drwxr-xr-x 13 root root 260 Oct 8 14:20 ../ drwxrwxrwx 1 nobody users 48 Sep 22 22:02 ISOs/ drwxrwxrwx 1 nobody users 126 Jun 27 21:47 Scans/ drwxrwxrwx 1 nobody users 85 Aug 13 2019 Wii/ drwxrwxrwx 1 nobody users 208 Dec 14 2019 apivk/ drwxrwxrwx 1 nobody users 788 Oct 5 07:23 appdata/ drwxrwxrwx 1 nobody users 26 Sep 25 15:17 bpivk/ drwxrwxrwx 1 nobody users 6 Sep 29 19:50 dmz/ drwx--x--- 1 root root 254 Oct 4 17:06 docker/ drwxrwxrwx 1 printer users 16 Mar 17 2021 downloads/ drwxrwxrwx 1 nobody users 52 Mar 3 2020 gpivk/ drwxrwxrwx 1 nobody users 19 Jul 23 21:32 irena/ -rw-rw-rw- 1 nobody users 1073741824 Feb 12 2021 libvirt.img drwxrwxrwx 1 8 mem 44 Apr 12 11:02 mail/ drwxrwx--- 1 nobody users 148 Jun 20 21:10 nextcloud/ drwxrwxrwx 1 nobody users 70 Feb 16 2021 paperless/ drwxrwxrwx 1 nobody users 4096 May 12 11:28 programi/ drwxrwxrwx 1 nobody users 4096 Feb 3 2019 roms/ drwxrwxrwx 1 nobody users 4096 Sep 25 17:41 series/ drwxrwxrwx 1 printer users 16 Feb 2 2020 series-download/ drwxrwxrwx 1 nobody users 4096 Jun 1 04:20 video/ Quote Link to comment
gxs Posted October 8, 2022 Author Share Posted October 8, 2022 On 9/24/2022 at 2:14 PM, ChatNoir said: Please attach your diagnostics to your next post. Attached tower-diagnostics-20221008-1423.zip Quote Link to comment
gxs Posted October 8, 2022 Author Share Posted October 8, 2022 (edited) I didn't get a reply notification so sorry for the late answer. I also forgot to mention that this happens on all OS. I have tested it on two computers and one VM machine on Unraid and as soon as you set the parameter "access based share enum = yes" the folders are not shown. Since I'm using a Windows 11 and an older Windows 10 VM it has to be the update as the old version worked fine and nothing changed in the meantime. I basically want to hide folders from users that don't have access to them and this issue is holding me back from upgrading two company servers that use this parameter. Edited October 8, 2022 by gxs Quote Link to comment
JorgeB Posted October 8, 2022 Share Posted October 8, 2022 Permissions look fine, and if the problem is related to "access based share enum" I really cannot help, never used that option nor remember anyone else on the forum using it, possible it's broken or working differently with the new Samba release. Quote Link to comment
Draco1544 Posted November 30, 2022 Share Posted November 30, 2022 On 10/8/2022 at 3:09 PM, JorgeB said: Permissions look fine, and if the problem is related to "access based share enum" I really cannot help, never used that option nor remember anyone else on the forum using it, possible it's broken or working differently with the new Samba release. Any update on this issue ? Quote Link to comment
JorgeB Posted December 1, 2022 Share Posted December 1, 2022 Nope, do you need to use access based share enum = yes ? Quote Link to comment
gxs Posted December 1, 2022 Author Share Posted December 1, 2022 16 minutes ago, JorgeB said: Nope, do you need to use access based share enum = yes ? Well if there's any other way to hide shares to which other users have no access then no. If not then yes. 😁 Quote Link to comment
JorgeB Posted December 1, 2022 Share Posted December 1, 2022 Like mentioned I can't help with that setting, not sure if @dlandoncan. Quote Link to comment
dlandon Posted December 1, 2022 Share Posted December 1, 2022 On 9/24/2022 at 4:20 AM, gxs said: It seems that something broke on the update. It doesn't like this setting anymore. access based share enum = yes Did something change? The setting is described in this bug report. It's not really a bug, but the response describes more about how the setting works. You have to work with Windows Share Admin tool to get it to work properly. I suspect Windows has made some changes that are affecting how this setting works in Samba now. 1 Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.