Josh Posted September 2, 2011 Share Posted September 2, 2011 Is it possible to setup some drives in raid 0 and run as my cache drive? I previously ran 4 320GB drives on my windows machine that was my "Scratch" drive that did all the unrar'ing, paring, etc... and it was really fast fast. Since i've moved all of that kind of stuff to unraid its been painfully slow running on a single 7200 drive. SSD drives won't work, need about 1.5TB as my cache. If possible is it as simple as creating the stripe on the controller and booting up? I don't care about temps or spin downs. Just want to know before I bite the bullet and pick up a few more drives thanks Josh Quote Link to comment
BRiT Posted September 2, 2011 Share Posted September 2, 2011 Yes it is possible, but it needs to be done via a hardware-level RAID controller. Quote Link to comment
Johnm Posted September 2, 2011 Share Posted September 2, 2011 yes. You need a hardware raid card. many of the cheaper cards are software based. just keep in mind you are doubleing (or tripple with 3 drives) your chance of the drive failing and all data lost. As far as an SSD cache drive, they work fine.. mostely. The only issue I am aware of is the OCZ drives show up as -128 deg. As long as you dont run the auto shutdown on drive overheat package, thats ok. As far as I could tell, I was geting the full Sata3 speed on it. I have also used a mushkin SSD with no issues. lt reported zero deg. Quote Link to comment
Josh Posted September 2, 2011 Author Share Posted September 2, 2011 are the on-board controllers on motherboards hardware or software? Not worried about cache failing, I backup whatever the mover script doesn't move daily I didn't mean SSD drives don't work, I meant I can't afford to add 1.5TB of SSD's as a cache drive, I wish :-) Quote Link to comment
BRiT Posted September 2, 2011 Share Posted September 2, 2011 are the on-board controllers on motherboards hardware or software? Depends on how expensive of a motherboard you're using. Here's some general observations that seem to fit. If it's not a motherboard specifically made for server systems ($400+) then it's software based. Quote Link to comment
SSD Posted September 2, 2011 Share Posted September 2, 2011 There is more to it than having hardware RAID. You also want a spindown option, and obviously want unRaid to support it. Look at the Areca ARC-1200 cards. PCIe x1 / 2 port card. Supported pretty well by unRaid. Has spindown option. Supports multi-RAID. I run one as parity in RAID0, and another as a standalone mirrored RAID1 volume. Also used a RAID0 volume as cache but doesn't work very well sharing same disks with parity. I would comment that you are not going to see much speed improvement with a RAID0 cache drive. Your bottlenecks are elsewhere. If you are running apps locally you might be justified. As parity I get a little write boost - up to 46 MB/sec when writing to a 7200 RPM data disk. Also I can upsize my parity volume up to 6T using my 2 3T disks. Quote Link to comment
Josh Posted September 2, 2011 Author Share Posted September 2, 2011 I'm not going after parity speed and my drives never spin down. Its taking 7-14 minutes to unrar a 10GB file, partly because of my CPU and partly because i'm writing to the disk at the same time the file is un-raring. I did a test, it took 2 minutes to unrar a 10GB file on the cache drive when nothing was being written to the disk. However when SABnzbd is downloading its hitting the 7-14 minute range. I tried both with unrar'ing through sabnzbd and unraring manually To be honest i'm very tempted to build a little 1U machine just to run my services and take unraid back to just storage, its getting hit with more and more traffic. Even had trouble watching a movie last night. Had trouble with a workout video this morning that was just SD. Kept buffering and everytime it was buffereing I went to the server and it was unraring something and sysload was going over 7.0. Also everytime it unrar's my DL speed cuts in half, once it finishes it jumps back up to max speed load average: 4.36, 5.42, 5.75. That's on a dual core AMD X2 240. If I remember correctly is it correct that single core should stay under 1.0, dual core under 2.0, quad core under 4.0, etc... I've got a new processor coming to see if it makes any difference And I didn't have much improvent with two drives in Raid 0, but when you add 4 to the stripe, I noticed a significant jump, didn't matter if I was writing to the disk and unrar'ing at the same time, it was the same speed not matter what. I tried 5 and 6 drives and all were the same write speed as the 4 drive setup. Note i'm running sickbeard, headphones, sabnzbd, mysql, plex, slimserver Quote Link to comment
brian89gp Posted September 2, 2011 Share Posted September 2, 2011 Should try what sabnzbd themselves suggest, having the incomplete and complete directories on different drives. Fewer drives, less chance of total loss, and probably will run at the same speed or better then a 4 disk RAID 0 I am using very old and very used 400gb SATA drives for the incomplete and complete disks and unrar of 12gb usually takes under 3 minutes and that is even while downloading something else at 50mb/s. Also, I am running this inside of ESXi with a single CPU and 1GB of RAM (single core off of a e5530 2.4ghz processor). Load average is rarely above 1.5. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.