1st real parity check 1605 errors

[krodami]

I ran my first parity check after adding 1TB of data to it, and it returned 1605 errors.

I see a lot of references to gdrive and dropbox which are rclone mounts.

Nov  5 23:33:41 UNRAID emhttpd: error: malloc_share_locations, 7193: Operation not supported (95): getxattr: /mnt/user/gdrive
Nov  5 23:33:42 UNRAID emhttpd: error: malloc_share_locations, 7193: Operation not supported (95): getxattr: /mnt/user/dropbox

 

Is it an issue when they are mounted to '/mnt/user/'? Should rclone mounts go under the '/mnt/remotes/' folder or somewhere else?

 

There are also a fair amount of these types of logs

Nov  5 16:39:41 UNRAID kernel: md: recovery thread: P incorrect, sector=9143051688

 

What should be my next steps at this point?

 

unraid-diagnostics-20231106-0823.zip

Edited November 6, 2023 by krodami
more details added

[JorgeB]

If there weren't any unclean shutdowns start by running memtest.

[krodami]

6 minutes ago, JorgeB said:

If there weren't any unclean shutdowns start by running memtest.

No unclean shutdowns. I will run a memtest shortly and post another update

[krodami]

8 hours ago, JorgeB said:

If there weren't any unclean shutdowns start by running memtest.

 

No memtest errors

 

[JorgeB]

Run a correcting check then a non correcting one without rebooting, if the 2nd one finds errors post new diags.

[krodami]

On 11/7/2023 at 1:11 AM, JorgeB said:

Run a correcting check then a non correcting one without rebooting, if the 2nd one finds errors post new diags.

 

It has not finished yet but i do see this on the dashboard "Sync errors corrected: 1605"

 

[JorgeB]

Post new diags once it finishes.

[krodami]

5 hours ago, JorgeB said:

Post new diags once it finishes.

unraid-diagnostics-20231108-1539.zip

[krodami]

4 hours ago, krodami said:

unraid-diagnostics-20231108-1539.zip 260.3 kB · 0 downloads

this is after running the correcting check, i will run another non-correcting check next.

[JorgeB]

If this is the first check post new ones after the second one but only if more errors are found, as mentioned.

[krodami]

On 11/9/2023 at 1:23 AM, JorgeB said:

If this is the first check post new ones after the second one but only if more errors are found, as mentioned.

I just wanted to circle back to this and let you know that the second check ran and reports 0 errors upon completion, thanks.

 

I'm still not sure what the first set of errors was all about but I guess everything should be in an ok and healthy state?

[JorgeB]

Yes, just keep monitoring the next checks, if still 0 errors all should be fine.