jimmydrac Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 This week I built a unRAID server using beta 5.14. I also ordered the SASLP-MV8. User dgaschk posted in another post that I should use 4.7 since the SASLP-MV8 has problems in the beta's but that it should be fixed in the 5 release version. I didn't know that before installing. Guess I missed that in all the reading I did before installing. Is there a way to downgrade to 4.7 since I never had it to begin with. I have no configuration file other that beta 5.14. I might be able to put off using the SASLP-MV8 for a month or so before I need to add it to the server. Thanks Jim B E6750/Asus P5K-E 2 Gigs Kingston ram 6x 2TB Seagate LP SeaSonic X Series X650 Gold Quote Link to comment
dgaschk Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 Read 5.0 beta 14 upgrade from 4.7 instructions and reverse them. You should only have to replace 2 files. Quote Link to comment
jimmydrac Posted January 13, 2012 Author Share Posted January 13, 2012 Will there be any problem with permissions? I read in the 5.14 instructions that upgrading had different permissions. Thanks for the quick reply Jim B E6750/Asus P5K-E 2 Gigs Kingston ram 6x 2TB Seagate LP SeaSonic X Series X650 Gold Quote Link to comment
dgaschk Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 The permissions need to be updated for 5.0. 4.7 does not care. When you upgrade the "New Permissions" script must be run, not for a downgrade. Quote Link to comment
graywolf Posted January 13, 2012 Share Posted January 13, 2012 You might want to check the 5b11 and/or the 5b12/5b12a threads. Not aware of MV8 issues with 5b11. Quote Link to comment
jimmydrac Posted January 14, 2012 Author Share Posted January 14, 2012 Weren't there some speed issues with 5b11? I am thinking I will probably downgrade to 4.7 for now and wait until 5 has fixed the SASLP-MV8 problem. Thanks Jim B E6750/Asus P5K-E 2 Gigs Kingston ram 6x 2TB Seagate LP SeaSonic X Series X650 Gold Quote Link to comment
seanant Posted January 14, 2012 Share Posted January 14, 2012 The beta version I used had problems too. 4.7 is the most stable version I've used recently. Before that I was on 4.5 for a couple years and the array ran perfectly. I upgraded to one if the 5.x beta versions and had problem after problem. The lesson learned for me is don't use beta code if you don't want problems. I'm back up on 5.7 and won't upgrade to 5.x until a couple of revisions later. Quote Link to comment
jimmydrac Posted January 15, 2012 Author Share Posted January 15, 2012 This doesn't work. I replaced the 2 files after backing up of course, and it will boot, I can access the webpage, but it says Invalid configuration...too many wrong or missing disks. I went to the devices and set up the disks EXACTLY as they should be, but nothing. It still says Invalid configuration. I can shut down, copy the 5.14 files back over, and everything boots fine. I tried to downgrade to 5.11 and it went crazy. It worked fine until it was time for the drives to power down...then all hell broke loose. Couldn't even access the web page, had to force shutdown at command level. I just want to downgrade to 4.7 since I will be using a SASLP-MV8 that arrives on monday. I don't want to have to move the 2TB of data I have already placed on unRAID off, and then wipe everything and start over. But I will if that it the only way. Can anyone please tell me what's wrong that I can't downgrade to 4.7? Again just replacing the 2 files DOES NOT WORK. Thanks Jim B E6750/Asus P5K-E 2 Gigs Kingston ram 3x 2TB Seagate LP SeaSonic X Series X650 Gold Quote Link to comment
daniel.boone Posted January 15, 2012 Share Posted January 15, 2012 I've up and downgraded, the only thing I did in addition to replacing the bz* files was to delete the passwd, shadow and smbpasswd files from the config directory. I don't think thats the issue but worth a try. One thing to watch out for is some of the drive serials are very similar. You could have a 2 drives in the wrong slot so it comes up invalid when switching versions. I had to unassign most drives and reassign in the correct order before the system gave me a valid. Quote Link to comment
dgaschk Posted January 15, 2012 Share Posted January 15, 2012 Worst case is that you'll have to reset the config and rewrite parity. People have been having success with the SASLP-MV8 in beta14. See the beta 14 announcements thread. You may want to try it. Quote Link to comment
baggies Posted September 9, 2012 Share Posted September 9, 2012 I'm thinking of downgrading to v4.7. Is this done by replacing the two files or is there any other way to downgrade? Quote Link to comment
djonesax Posted September 9, 2012 Share Posted September 9, 2012 Can you tell us why you want to downgrade? I am on the latest release and so far have not had any issues and I am using the SASLP-MV8 card. I would like to know what issues you are experiencing, so I know what to possibly expect. Thanks, David Quote Link to comment
Joe L. Posted September 9, 2012 Share Posted September 9, 2012 I'm thinking of downgrading to v4.7. Is this done by replacing the two files or is there any other way to downgrade? save a copy of the config directory. save a screen shot of the disk assignment page. run the following command on EVERY one of your disks, and save the output. fdisk -lu /dev/sdX If you have IDE disks, run fdisk -lu /dev/hdX on each of them. You may not need these, but if you find a disk that subsequently shows as unformatted, or one that cannot mount, you can set a new disk config and re-configure the user-shares, etc. Quote Link to comment
baggies Posted September 9, 2012 Share Posted September 9, 2012 Can you tell us why you want to downgrade? I am on the latest release and so far have not had any issues and I am using the SASLP-MV8 card. I would like to know what issues you are experiencing, so I know what to possibly expect. Thanks, David It's my own fault. I upgraded to try and get AirPrint working. I failed on that miserably. I thought I'd downgrade to a stable version again but it looks like I might be better off staying where I am. Quote Link to comment
mrow Posted September 9, 2012 Share Posted September 9, 2012 The latest RC is rock solid for me. Quote Link to comment
dgaschk Posted September 10, 2012 Share Posted September 10, 2012 Use latest RC. There are a few cases of people having issues but most are fine. Quote Link to comment
baggies Posted September 10, 2012 Share Posted September 10, 2012 What type of issues should I watch out for? Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.