RackIt Posted May 9, 2012 Share Posted May 9, 2012 I rebooted the array and the web interface and array is offline. My syslog is attached. Any help would be appreciate. Thanks. If I may refer back to the problem I am having and posted of earlier, my array is still down but I just noticed that the tower website actually keeps showing "System is rebooting..." even after being rebooted a few times. Any suggestions? Thanks. Quote Link to comment
MyKroFt Posted May 9, 2012 Share Posted May 9, 2012 force a page reload in your browser - most browsers you can hold down the left shift and reload the page, it will cause the browser to ignore the cache dir.... Myk Quote Link to comment
jbartlett Posted May 9, 2012 Share Posted May 9, 2012 For those with RC2 getting sluggish on them, telnet in while the server is still healthy with two windows - run running TOP and another with a tail -f running against the syslog. Quote Link to comment
MyKroFt Posted May 9, 2012 Share Posted May 9, 2012 mine last night got sluggish only after I told it to reboot after a raid shutdown - took almost 10-15 min to go thru the reboot process - I was in a telnet window the entire session watching the log - nothing out of the ordinary - just SLOW - after reboot - everything has been fine so I dont have any info on what went on - so am watching it for the next couple of days.... Myk Quote Link to comment
RackIt Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 force a page reload in your browser - most browsers you can hold down the left shift and reload the page, it will cause the browser to ignore the cache dir.... Myk Thanks. I actually tried loading it from another machine and the message is the same. I suppose I need to try some way to restart the web server component? My array is still completely offline. HELP PLEASE! Quote Link to comment
RackIt Posted May 10, 2012 Share Posted May 10, 2012 I restarted the emhttp process and the web interface is back up. killall emhttp nohup emhttp >/dev/null 2>&1 & I started the array but is still sits at "Starting..." but that may be because the cache drive is still mounting? Quote Link to comment
PeterB Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 ... Snip I then looked at the same directories from Ubuntu: peter@desktop:~$ ls -l /net/tower/mnt/user ls: cannot access /net/tower/mnt/user/Photos: Stale NFS file handle total 0 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 May 7 18:19 Movies drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 May 7 18:19 Music d??? ? ? ? ? ? Photos drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 May 7 18:19 series drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 May 7 18:19 Series drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 May 7 18:19 UMC drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 May 7 18:19 Videos peter@desktop:~$ ls -l /net/tower/mnt/user/Photos ls: cannot access /net/tower/mnt/user/Photos: Stale NFS file handle peter@desktop:~$ sudo umount -f /net/tower/mnt/user/Photos [sudo] password for peter: peter@desktop:~$ ls -l /net/tower/mnt/user total 0 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 May 7 18:19 Movies drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 May 7 18:19 Music drwxrwxr-x 1 99 users 72 May 7 18:20 Photos drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 May 7 18:19 series drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 May 7 18:19 Series drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 May 7 18:19 UMC drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 May 7 18:19 Videos peter@desktop:~$ ls -l /net/tower/mnt/user total 8 drwxrwx--- 1 99 users 6912 May 6 16:14 Movies drwxrwx--- 1 99 users 384 Apr 8 18:00 Music drwxrwxr-x 1 99 users 72 May 7 18:20 Photos drwxrwx--- 1 99 users 296 Sep 14 2011 series drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 May 7 18:19 Series drwxrwxr-x 1 99 users 520 Nov 12 19:58 UMC drwxrwx--- 1 99 users 504 Jan 2 09:01 Videos peter@desktop:~$ I use autofs to mount nfs shares automatically, hence I don't have to issue the mount command. Between the last two 'ls -l /net/tower/mnt/user' I had opened the Photos share in Nautilus - note that ownership of most folders has changed from 'root' to '99'. Here is the line showing details of the 'Photos' share from the output of 'mount' from Ubuntu. tower:/mnt/user/Photos on /net/tower/mnt/user/Photos type nfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,vers=3,hard,intr,nolock,udp,sloppy,addr=10.2.0.100) With version 5, you shouldn't see any files or directories owned by 'root' or in the group 'root'. Did you run the 'New Permissions' utility after upgrading to version 5? 99 is the UID for user 'nobody'. Yes, I did run the 'New Permissions' utility, back in the days of 5.0b3, or b4. Quote Link to comment
limetech Posted May 11, 2012 Author Share Posted May 11, 2012 Open a telnet session and type: vdir /mnt All those directories should have ownership set to "nobody/users". If not, you should re-run 'New permissions' util. Quote Link to comment
PeterB Posted May 12, 2012 Share Posted May 12, 2012 Open a telnet session and type: vdir /mnt All those directories should have ownership set to "nobody/users". If not, you should re-run 'New permissions' util. They do: root@Tower:~# vdir /mnt total 2 drwxrwx--- 14 nobody users 504 2012-05-08 08:01 cache/ drwxrwx--- 20 nobody users 624 2012-05-08 07:39 disk1/ drwxrwx--- 17 nobody users 408 2012-01-25 08:30 disk2/ drwxrwx--- 11 nobody users 264 2011-10-17 19:18 disk3/ drwxrwx--- 7 nobody users 152 2012-05-07 20:00 disk4/ drwxrwx--- 1 nobody users 504 2012-05-08 08:01 user/ drwxrwx--- 1 nobody users 624 2012-05-08 07:39 user0/ root@Tower:~# Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.