May 27, 20251 yr Hello,I finally finished moving all my things from my old synology, and yesterday added the second HDD drive for Array parity, and another SSD to the cache pool for redundancy.After assigning both and starting up, it started building the parody for the Array, but the cache was still down. According to [this guide](https://forums.unraid.net/topic/46802-faq-for-unraid-v6/#comment-480417), I then ran the balancing on the Cache pool while the Array was rebuilding and nothing happened (in the UI). I changed the "rebalance" to unraid1 cause after reading another forum post I figured that's what I wanted? (1 spare, so 2 mirroring drives is RAID1? I'm not fluent in RAID speak, even reading wiki isn't very helpful).I clicked start and since then my cache has been in Readonly, and docker refuses to start. I didn't know it's readonly initially, I only knew docker wasn't running. Looking up the issue I had when running ecrc.d/rc.docker start I found it could be corrupt vDisk, so I deleted it and tried again (obv didn't work) and I'm super mad cause I might've lost some databases for no reason.. (Some can't be bind-mounted)Now I am stuck with readonly cache pool. Why is btrfs the default if half the unraid docks keeps apologizing for not knowing how it works!?btrfs scrub start -rdB /dev/sdc1returns:root@Tower:~# sudo btrfs scrub start -rB /dev/sdc1 Starting scrub on devid 1 ERROR: scrubbing /dev/sdc1 failed for device id 1: ret=-1, errno=30 (Read-only file system) scrub canceled for 77b95c22-29af-4138-bdc2-97be8f555818 Scrub started: Tue May 27 11:15:06 2025 Status: aborted Duration: 0:00:00 Total to scrub: 0.00B Rate: 0.00B/s Error summary: no errors foundNot sure where to go from here. Any tips? In the meantime the Array finished building parity successfully, and I copied what I could from the drive cache was originally on.Thanks, besides this fighting with drives unraid has been a blessing! tower-diagnostics-20250527-1130.zip
May 27, 20251 yr Community Expert Pool went read only due to no space, post the output from:fdisk -l /dev/sde
May 27, 20251 yr Author 1 hour ago, JorgeB said:Pool went read only due to no space, post the output from:fdisk -l /dev/sdeDisk /dev/sde: 111.79 GiB, 120034123776 bytes, 234441648 sectors Disk model: KINGSTON SV300S3 Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disklabel type: dos Disk identifier: 0x00000000 Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type /dev/sde1 2048 234441647 234439600 111.8G 83 LinuxBoth the drives are 128gb, I thought I'd just have 120gb still but now with one disk of redundancy, not sure how adding a drive can remove half the capacity
May 27, 20251 yr Community Expert The btrfs usage doesn't make sense, post output of btrfs fi usage -T /mnt/cache
May 27, 20251 yr Author 1 hour ago, JorgeB said:The btrfs usage doesn't make sense, post output of btrfs fi usage -T /mnt/cacheOverall: Device size: 112.38GiB Device allocated: 111.96GiB Device unallocated: 427.02MiB Device missing: 0.00B Device slack: 0.00B Used: 36.14GiB Free (estimated): 73.96GiB (min: 73.75GiB) Free (statfs, df): 36.97GiB Data ratio: 1.01 Metadata ratio: 2.00 Global reserve: 17.66MiB (used: 0.00B) Multiple profiles: yes (data) Data Data Metadata System Id Path single RAID1 DUP DUP Unallocated Total Slack -- --------- --------- --------- -------- -------- ----------- --------- ----- 1 /dev/sdc1 108.77GiB - 2.00GiB 16.00MiB 1.00GiB 111.79GiB - 2 /dev/sde1 - - - - 600.00MiB 600.00MiB - -- --------- --------- --------- -------- -------- ----------- --------- ----- Total 108.77GiB 599.00MiB 1.00GiB 8.00MiB 1.59GiB 112.38GiB 0.00B Used 36.01GiB 0.00B 66.78MiB 16.00KiB I don't understand why the second drive is showing up like that, this is how it looks in unraid dash: Edited May 27, 20251 yr by djkato
May 27, 20251 yr Author Could it be because I pressed the balance button twice cuz UI didn't react, so it interrupted the first one only partially formatting it (that's the 600mb?) and on second press it locked up, now being confused?I feel like just removing the drive and adding it again could work? I don't see a way to check if it has any data on that second drive though
May 27, 20251 yr Community Expert 22 minutes ago, djkato said:600.00MiB Btrfs is detecting this device as 600MB, not sure why, but the easiest way to resolve may be to copy all the data somewhere else, then recreate the pool, and see if the space is correctly detected.
May 27, 20251 yr Author 1 hour ago, JorgeB said:..., then recreate the pool, ...Not sure how I do this, relatively new to unraid. I assume it's:1. Stop the arrays (copy everything off of it first obv.)2. unassign both drives3. start and then stop the array4. assign the array5. start?Also, do you recommend I make it btrfs again or should I do ZFS/XFS? I don't plan on adding more in the foreseeable future, and I read that btrfs isn't mature enough yet. What's the benefit that devs chose it over XFS?Thanks for your help :)
May 27, 20251 yr Community Expert Solution 41 minutes ago, djkato said:1. Stop the arrays (copy everything off of it first obv.)After this, click the 1st pool device, then click "erase pool" and confirm, then back to main start array and reformat.This is not a btrfs issue, but after erasing the pool you can change the filesystem to zfs, xfs is for single pool device pool only.
May 27, 20251 yr Author (edit, forum deleted all my text ?!) Hey, It's been trying to stop the array for almost an hour now. Not sure what to do? Or if force turning off the server is safe. The parody is apparently good. Also, you said XFS is for single drive. Is it ok that my main drive is XFS, or is that a problem? Edited May 27, 20251 yr by djkato
May 27, 20251 yr Community Expert In the main array each drive is a self contained file system so any format is allowed. In pools you can only use xfs in single drive pools.
May 27, 20251 yr Community Expert If it won’t stop by itself then normally all you can do is a forced stop by holding down the power button.
May 28, 20251 yr Author I erased and redid it, it seems to work now. Sad that I had to wipe everything, now I have to change ownership of so many folders so the docker bind-mounts work x-x but thanks for yall's help!
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.