Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Unraid

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

16TB Missing Pool

Featured Replies

Hello: I just created a pool to use as a local backup using a ext USB Nas. Can anyine tell me if there is a reason that 4 8TB drives only show up as 16TB? Thank You

Screenshot 2026-10-01 at 11.17.36 AM.png

Solved by JorgeB

  • Community Expert

It depends on which btrfs profile the pool is set to use. The default will be raid1 which means half the total space is available for files.

  • Community Expert

What RAID type have you selected for it? By default it'd be RAID1 so half the capacity for redundancy.

Edited by Kilrah

  • Author
1 minute ago, itimpi said:

It depends on which btrfs profile the pool is set to use. The default will be raid1 which means half the total space is available for files.

OK, makes sense. I want it to act like a normal drive. I had it back up to another server, but it took forever. Can a pool be formatted as RAID 0?

  • Author
8 minutes ago, Kilrah said:

What RAID type have you selected for it? By default it's be RAID1 so half the capacity for redundancy.

Makes sense: Can I assume that if I format them as NTFS, I can pool them as a pool without the dedundancy? I dont need them to be redundant as they are actually backing up my array, and that would be redundant redundant. lol

  • Community Expert
2 minutes ago, Windlasher said:

Makes sense: Can I assume that if I format them as NTFS

Not in a single pool, but you can use btrfs single profile or zfs stripe for that, no redundancy obviously.

  • Author
13 minutes ago, JorgeB said:

Not in a single pool, but you can use btrfs single profile or zfs stripe for that, no redundancy obviously.

I just found a convoluted way to do that, but will give it a try. Thank you for your guidance.

  • Community Expert
  • Solution

P.S. if you go with btrfs, and since all disks are of the same size, might as well use RAID0 instead of single, same lack of redundancy, but it will be faster.

  • Author
5 minutes ago, JorgeB said:

P.S. if you go with btrfs, and since all disks are of the same size, might as well use RAID0 instead of single, same lack of redundancy, but it will be faster.

Excellent - This worked - Thank you very much.

  • Community Expert
14 hours ago, Windlasher said:

Hello: I just created a pool to use as a local backup using a ext USB Nas.

Just be aware that all those 8TB drives are SMR. While btrfs RAID0 initial sequential writes might perform well, the rewrites will encounter significant traffic jams.

Edited by Lolight

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.