ixnu Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/134672-harvard-cracks-dna-storage-crams-700-terabytes-of-data-into-a-single-gram A bioengineer and geneticist at Harvard’s Wyss Institute have successfully stored 5.5 petabits of data — around 700 terabytes — in a single gram of DNA, smashing the previous DNA data density record by a thousand times. Link to comment
PeterB Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 Storing data in your skin would be a fantastic way of transferring data securely… ... but think of the consequences of data theft! I never did fancy a car which used fingerprint identity - I'm not sure whether the stories of digit amputation are factual, but I'd rather not tempt the thieves! Link to comment
lainie Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 Storing data in your skin would be a fantastic way of transferring data securely… ... but think of the consequences of data theft! I never did fancy a car which used fingerprint identity - I'm not sure whether the stories of digit amputation are factual, but I'd rather not tempt the thieves! I've felt the same way. Finger print scanners are one thing, but retinal scanners freak me out. Link to comment
bonzi Posted August 19, 2012 Share Posted August 19, 2012 Well this is very interesting. I work as a scientist...I have a PhD in biochemistry. While this would definitely work...I think it would take an unimaginably long time to read and write information. Link to comment
PeterB Posted August 19, 2012 Share Posted August 19, 2012 I think it would take an unimaginably long time to read and write information. That was my immediate thought, but then I see that the arrangement is that they use short dna chains, with an index to locate the correct chain. In any case, they do seem to be proposing the technology for archival, rather than online storage. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.