optiman Posted October 2, 2012 Share Posted October 2, 2012 My parity check completed with the following, * Duration: 12 hours, 35 minutes, 18 seconds. Average speed: 66.2 MB/sec See Sig for setup. Given how large my array is, and my parity disk is 3TB, the speeds seem ok to me. Quote Link to comment
pras1011 Posted October 2, 2012 Share Posted October 2, 2012 And just got a SAS error on one of my SAS2LP. Tested the drive in question thoroughly, no SMART errors. I just can't win with unRAID anymore, headache after headache. I will replace the drive and see if it happens again... That is what your sig is for, or even copy/paste from a nice little text file sitting in your docs. Funny thing about that, I use to have it in there, and people still asked my h/w config. After upgrading my server, just removed it completely. And just got a SAS error on one of my SAS2LP. Tested the drive in question thoroughly, no SMART errors. I just can't win with unRAID anymore, headache after headache. I will replace the drive and see if it happens again... That is what your sig is for, or even copy/paste from a nice little text file sitting in your docs. Funny thing about that, I use to have it in there, and people still asked my h/w config. After upgrading my server, just removed it completely. And just got a SAS error on one of my SAS2LP. Tested the drive in question thoroughly, no SMART errors. I just can't win with unRAID anymore, headache after headache. I will replace the drive and see if it happens again... That is what your sig is for, or even copy/paste from a nice little text file sitting in your docs. Funny thing about that, I use to have it in there, and people still asked my h/w config. After upgrading my server, just removed it completely. I think I had the same error with my sas2lp on 8a. It reballed one of my drives which I checked thoroughly afterwards with smart to find no issues. I have gone back to rc6 test2. Quote Link to comment
tyrindor Posted October 2, 2012 Share Posted October 2, 2012 I think I had the same error with my sas2lp on 8a. It reballed one of my drives which I checked thoroughly afterwards with smart to find no issues. I have gone back to rc6 test2. I removed the drive that errored and replaced it with a precleared drive, rebuild is going. I'm now preclearing the drive that was red balled for what appeared to be no reason. After 2 hours, it now has 2 pending sectors and 2 offline uncorrectable sectors. My error may have been related to the actual drive. I think im just going to play it safe and RMA. One of my servers seriously gives me trouble 2-3x a month, I just replaced a faulty hotswap bay in it last week. Now a drive seems to be dying, I went through and checked SMART on the other discs, I show 2 CRC errors on parity, and 15 crc errors on Disk 7. Disk 7 is the hotswap bay I replaced, so i'm going to assume that the CRC errors were caused by that. Parity.. not sure. These drives are using SAS to SAS cables, you'd think if 1 is having CRC errors, all 4 would be. I also see raw read errors of "1" on like 3 drives, but I don't think that's too alarming, considering the amount of data read/write from them. Going to have to keep an eye on them and make sure the values don't keep raising. EDIT: Can we please get a new build with updated samba? It's really causing some issues/annoyances as others have pointed out. Quote Link to comment
speeding_ant Posted October 2, 2012 Share Posted October 2, 2012 It will happen - just that Tom is on holiday, and he stated that. Be lucky he told us Quote Link to comment
dalben Posted October 2, 2012 Share Posted October 2, 2012 EDIT: Can we please get a new build with updated samba? It's really causing some issues/annoyances as others have pointed out. I'm using the work around detailed in this thread and haven't had any issues since. Quote Link to comment
PeteAron Posted October 5, 2012 Share Posted October 5, 2012 That is what your sig is for, or even copy/paste from a nice little text file sitting in your docs. Funny thing about that, I use to have it in there, and people still asked my h/w config. After upgrading my server, just removed it completely. It is really frustrating when people ask for that information while it is sitting in your sig - you'd think on this forum that ppl would look at the sig before asking. Quote Link to comment
WeeboTech Posted October 5, 2012 Share Posted October 5, 2012 That is what your sig is for, or even copy/paste from a nice little text file sitting in your docs. Funny thing about that, I use to have it in there, and people still asked my h/w config. After upgrading my server, just removed it completely. It is really frustrating when people ask for that information while it is sitting in your sig - you'd think on this forum that ppl would look at the sig before asking. Not everyone puts it in the sig. Would be cool if there was a profile section available. Does SMF have some kind of add on to allow this? Quote Link to comment
mr-hexen Posted October 5, 2012 Share Posted October 5, 2012 /cough stay on topic /cough Quote Link to comment
jumperalex Posted October 5, 2012 Share Posted October 5, 2012 /cough stay on topic /cough so long as it stop here, this is on-topic. knowing a poster's hardware setup is important when trying to find the cause of RC issues. Now ... moving on Quote Link to comment
JackBauer Posted October 5, 2012 Share Posted October 5, 2012 /cough stay on topic /cough I kinda agree. I keep coming to this thread in hopes of commentary from Tom - either a new release (8b) or just more of his valuable and appreciated wisdom. Quote Link to comment
Influencer Posted October 5, 2012 Share Posted October 5, 2012 Sorry to keep going off topic but it is relevant to the off topic topic I believe a lot of users visit the forums with tapatalk, which doesn't display sigs. That probably accounts for quite a few of those questions /end off topic Quote Link to comment
kizer Posted October 5, 2012 Share Posted October 5, 2012 Not everyone puts it in the sig. Would be cool if there was a profile section available. Does SMF have some kind of add on to allow this? Simply click on their name on the Left and it will take you to their profile. If they have a signature it would be displayed there. As well there are a few mods you can install that will allow for other fields to be filled in. For example on my site I allow for others to type in their Jeep make/model. I'd be more than willing to do the foot work for Limetech to find all that if hes interested. Heck I'll PM him with that info anyways. LOL I do agree we should shelf the OffTopic a bit and get back to This release. Quote Link to comment
opentoe Posted October 6, 2012 Share Posted October 6, 2012 Sadly my parity check speed is approx 60MB/sec. Back on 4.7 it was a little over 100MB/sec. I'm using the same hardware and even faster drives. What in the world is making it go so slow? Also, this new Samba I'm reading about. When you temporarily update to the new one with putting that line in your GO file, what happens to the Samba that is already built into the Kernel? Does that load also? Quote Link to comment
mejutty Posted October 7, 2012 Share Posted October 7, 2012 Sadly my parity check speed is approx 60MB/sec. Back on 4.7 it was a little over 100MB/sec. I'm using the same hardware and even faster drives. What in the world is making it go so slow? Also, this new Samba I'm reading about. When you temporarily update to the new one with putting that line in your GO file, what happens to the Samba that is already built into the Kernel? Does that load also? Hi, With your parity are you taking this reading from the end of the parity check from the syslog where it tells you how long and how many bytes errors etc or looking at the web interface while doing the check?? Quote Link to comment
opentoe Posted October 7, 2012 Share Posted October 7, 2012 Sadly my parity check speed is approx 60MB/sec. Back on 4.7 it was a little over 100MB/sec. I'm using the same hardware and even faster drives. What in the world is making it go so slow? Also, this new Samba I'm reading about. When you temporarily update to the new one with putting that line in your GO file, what happens to the Samba that is already built into the Kernel? Does that load also? Hi, With your parity are you taking this reading from the end of the parity check from the syslog where it tells you how long and how many bytes errors etc or looking at the web interface while doing the check?? I was looking at the speed while it was being done, on the web page. I had to cancel it (again) since it would have gone into the next day and I needed to server to be free of doing a parity check. Quote Link to comment
jaybee Posted October 7, 2012 Share Posted October 7, 2012 Those complaining about sigs. I always turn them off on all forums as a personal preference. Not everyone wants to read sigs or see them taking up valuable reading space. It is not always clear when a sig starts and you end up re-reading them all the time, not to mention that a lot of forums allow garish images in sigs which not everyone wants to see, especially at the workplace for example. Back to the thread, I see Tom said he would be out of the office until 3rd October. Yet it is the 7th, and still no ammendment to another poor release where people are having issues. My patience is wearing thin again. Quote Link to comment
Ostrich Posted October 7, 2012 Share Posted October 7, 2012 I just upgraded (from 4.6) to RC8a, and experienced the "not able to delete" issue (i have run the permissions script twice now) I tried installing the updated samba as well (as per others in this topic) however was still unable to delete certain files (can write to shares fine). I just had to remove some files via telnet. Would a new release with an updated samba included fix the permissions issue? I have also noticed (as per others in this thread) that exploring the files in this version is slower than the release i upgraded from (slight pauses when first opening directories, and slow refresh). Thanks Quote Link to comment
Ostrich Posted October 7, 2012 Share Posted October 7, 2012 Quick one, can you downgrade from a 5 RC to 4.7? Quote Link to comment
joeman2116 Posted October 7, 2012 Share Posted October 7, 2012 Ostrich, I had similar problems and solved it by adding the most current samba to my go file. (i originally found the info somewhere in the forum) I imagine it will be included in the release ver, but it worked for me... joe Unraid bld rc8a my go file: #!/bin/bash installpkg /boot/custom/samba-3.6.8-i486-1.txz # Start the Management Utility /usr/local/sbin/emhttp & Quote Link to comment
xamindar Posted October 7, 2012 Share Posted October 7, 2012 EDIT: Nevermind. I am loving this version so far. The features in the 5.0 series allowed me to ditch my unraid on full slackware and now I can have what I want with just the stock and addons. Quote Link to comment
opentoe Posted October 8, 2012 Share Posted October 8, 2012 I just upgraded (from 4.6) to RC8a, and experienced the "not able to delete" issue (i have run the permissions script twice now) I tried installing the updated samba as well (as per others in this topic) however was still unable to delete certain files (can write to shares fine). I just had to remove some files via telnet. Would a new release with an updated samba included fix the permissions issue? I have also noticed (as per others in this thread) that exploring the files in this version is slower than the release i upgraded from (slight pauses when first opening directories, and slow refresh). Thanks Trouble deleting from a client computer? Try logging into the server itself, even remotely using midnight commander and try to see if you can delete that way. I have always been able to delete anything from using MC. When connecting via a Windows share, sometimes the folder doesn't even update or remove what I have deleted. Not sure if the problem is Samba or something else. Hard to say, but Midnight Commander has always worked when in a pinch. Quote Link to comment
mr-hexen Posted October 8, 2012 Share Posted October 8, 2012 samba is not used when logging into the console (remotely or locally), which is why files stay deleted. Quote Link to comment
optiman Posted October 9, 2012 Share Posted October 9, 2012 this has been a issue. I found that if I add the AFP to the share, then connect with my imac, I'm able to delete the files. I sometimes have to reboot the server and ensure I do not attach to the shares with my Windows pc so the files are not locked. I'm then able to delete the files with my imac. Although using AFP does add a few directories and that leaves some stuff to clean up later after you remove the AFP stuff. Having the mac computer and using AFP helped me work around these SMB permissions issues. It only proves that SMB issues continue to haunt Windows pc clients. Quote Link to comment
Ostrich Posted October 9, 2012 Share Posted October 9, 2012 #!/bin/bash installpkg /boot/custom/samba-3.6.8-i486-1.txz # Start the Management Utility /usr/local/sbin/emhttp & Hey Joe Thanks for this. I tried again (loaded samba onto flash and edited GO file). Tested it was installed (it was), and rebooted server and windows PC. Still cant delete the files through windows. Have checked permissions on two files one old (pre RC8a) and one new (rc 8a). Both are -rw-rw---- nobody users Yet i get permission error on old file, and can delete new file. Weird... will continue to delete through telnet until new RC i guess, just a pain. Quote Link to comment
Joe L. Posted October 9, 2012 Share Posted October 9, 2012 #!/bin/bash installpkg /boot/custom/samba-3.6.8-i486-1.txz # Start the Management Utility /usr/local/sbin/emhttp & Hey Joe Thanks for this. I tried again (loaded samba onto flash and edited GO file). Tested it was installed (it was), and rebooted server and windows PC. Still cant delete the files through windows. Have checked permissions on two files one old (pre RC8a) and one new (rc 8a). Both are -rw-rw---- nobody users Yet i get permission error on old file, and can delete new file. Weird... will continue to delete through telnet until new RC i guess, just a pain. I've not done any testing at all of the inability to delete through samba, but I'll not be surprised if it is actually an issue in the user-shares logic that recently changed when over-writing a file when an existing file on one physical disk is renamed to that of a file on a different physical disk. When deleting through telnet, are you doing it on the /mnt/disk1/sharename/file, or on the /mnt/user/sharename/file ? (The first having absolutely nothing to do with user-shares) When unable to delete through SAMBA, is it on a user-share, or on a disk share? Joe L. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.