Dynamix - System Temp


Recommended Posts

On 3/27/2017 at 1:22 PM, ufopinball said:

Hi bonienl, I would also like to echo my thanks for your plugin.  I just upgraded my unRAID to use the new AMD Ryzen 1800X 8-core CPU, with the ASUS Prime X370-PRO motherboard.  I had to disable to existing Dynamix System Temp plugin because it was still expecting sensors from the previous system, and therefore was causing system instability.

 

Looking around, I found this thread:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/618nyc/linux_lmsensors_it87_support_for_some_am4/#bottom-comments

 

They're discussing an update to the it87 driver that supports a chip (?) called IT8665E used on some X370 motherboards.

 

I added a fresh copy of the Dynamix System Temp plugin, but at present these sensor options don't seem to be available.

 

In order to support the newer drivers, does this require an update to the Dynamix System Temp plugin, or a newer unRAID?  I'm running unRAID 6.3.2 PRO.

 

Thanks!!

- Bill

Hi Bill,

 

Did you get this working? I have a very similar build and haven't figured out how to get the system temps working with it yet.

 

Regards,

Link to comment
On 7/2/2017 at 9:44 PM, itsdandandan said:

Hi Bill,

 

Did you get this working? I have a very similar build and haven't figured out how to get the system temps working with it yet.

 

Regards,

 

Yes, well sort of anyway.  The full details are posted in another thread:

 

https://forums.lime-technology.com/topic/55150-anybody-planning-a-ryzen-build/?page=19#comment-563450

 

It's definitely an interim solution, though I don't know if/when a more official solution will be made available.

 

Let me know if you have problems getting this working...

 

- Bill

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
On 7/9/2017 at 7:19 PM, ufopinball said:

 

Yes, well sort of anyway.  The full details are posted in another thread:

 

https://forums.lime-technology.com/topic/55150-anybody-planning-a-ryzen-build/?page=19#comment-563450

 

It's definitely an interim solution, though I don't know if/when a more official solution will be made available.

 

Let me know if you have problems getting this working...

 

- Bill

 

Hi Bill,

 

Thanks! Working perfectly, did yours say what temperature was what? Mine just says temp1, temp2, temp3 etc as attached.

 

 

unRAIDTempSnip.PNG

 

EDIT: Don't worry, ran some CPU Stress tests and figured it out

Edited by itsdandandan
Link to comment
20 hours ago, itsdandandan said:

Hi Bill,

 

Thanks! Working perfectly, did yours say what temperature was what? Mine just says temp1, temp2, temp3 etc as attached.

 

 

unRAIDTempSnip.PNG

 

EDIT: Don't worry, ran some CPU Stress tests and figured it out

 

Looks good, which CPU and MB do you have?  My Ryzen 1800X idles at 42c (at best) with nothing running but unRAID.  All dockers and VMs are stopped.  The only thing "loaded" is a window to the web UI on the "Main" tab to show the current temp.  The UPS is reporting 45 watts, and that's with all drives spun down.

 

If you're getting lower 30s, I'm wondering what I may be doing wrong?  Chip isn't overclocked or anything.  I guess 45 watts isn't *bad*, but if it could be better, I'd like to find out what I'm doing differently.  My specs are in my signature.

 

Thanks!

- Bill

Link to comment
  • 4 weeks later...
On 7/9/2017 at 3:19 AM, ufopinball said:

 

Yes, well sort of anyway.  The full details are posted in another thread:

 

https://forums.lime-technology.com/topic/55150-anybody-planning-a-ryzen-build/?page=19#comment-563450

 

It's definitely an interim solution, though I don't know if/when a more official solution will be made available.

 

Let me know if you have problems getting this working...

 

- Bill

 

 

Same here, thanks bonienl for providing this plugin and kudos to Bill for the interim solution.   

Link to comment
On 7/14/2017 at 6:14 PM, ufopinball said:

 

Looks good, which CPU and MB do you have?  My Ryzen 1800X idles at 42c (at best) with nothing running but unRAID.  All dockers and VMs are stopped.  The only thing "loaded" is a window to the web UI on the "Main" tab to show the current temp.  The UPS is reporting 45 watts, and that's with all drives spun down.

 

If you're getting lower 30s, I'm wondering what I may be doing wrong?  Chip isn't overclocked or anything.  I guess 45 watts isn't *bad*, but if it could be better, I'd like to find out what I'm doing differently.  My specs are in my signature.

 

Thanks!

- Bill

Hi Bill,

 

I have the same motherboard as you but only have a Ryzen 1700 with the stock cooler. Also have the Fractal Design Define R5 which seems to have pretty good airflow.

 

Regards,

Link to comment
4 hours ago, itsdandandan said:

Hi Bill,

 

I have the same motherboard as you but only have a Ryzen 1700 with the stock cooler. Also have the Fractal Design Define R5 which seems to have pretty good airflow.

 

Guess that makes the difference.  The 1700 is a 3.0/3.7 GHz, 65 watt CPU, and the 1800X is a 3.6/4.0 GHz 95 watt CPU.

 

I'm still thinking I could have easily gotten by with a 1700 chip.  I doubt I stress out the 1800X enough to justify the price/power costs.

 

I'll likely rethink which model I upgrade to when Zen2 comes out.

 

- Bill

 

Link to comment
  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Hi, I'm having trouble with this, I installed perl via nerdpack, I installed the plugin, clicked detect, it found the lm78 driver, and then it could not detect any temperature/fan things. All the dropdowns don't have any options in them. Not sure what to do. I saw this, wondering if I need to update lm_sensors and install it87. Can someone advise me on how to do that, since I can't seem to find any package manager or even GCC in Unraid. Thanks!

snip.PNG

  • Like 1
Link to comment
  • 1 month later...
On 1/30/2018 at 10:04 AM, amelius said:

Hi, I'm having trouble with this, I installed perl via nerdpack, I installed the plugin, clicked detect, it found the lm78 driver, and then it could not detect any temperature/fan things. All the dropdowns don't have any options in them. Not sure what to do. I saw this, wondering if I need to update lm_sensors and install it87. Can someone advise me on how to do that, since I can't seem to find any package manager or even GCC in Unraid. Thanks!

snip.PNG

 

Type IT87 where LM78 is and click save. then check the drop downs.

Link to comment
2 minutes ago, fmp4m said:

 

What do you get from a terminal window when you type:

 

sensors

sensors-detect

 

# sensors-detect revision 6284 (2015-05-31 14:00:33 +0200)
# Board: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. PRIME B350-PLUS
# Kernel: 4.14.26-unRAID x86_64
# Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 1700X Eight-Core Processor (23/1/1)

This program will help you determine which kernel modules you need
to load to use lm_sensors most effectively. It is generally safe
and recommended to accept the default answers to all questions,
unless you know what you're doing.

Some south bridges, CPUs or memory controllers contain embedded sensors.
Do you want to scan for them? This is totally safe. (YES/no):
Silicon Integrated Systems SIS5595...                       No
VIA VT82C686 Integrated Sensors...                          No
VIA VT8231 Integrated Sensors...                            No
AMD K8 thermal sensors...                                   No
AMD Family 10h thermal sensors...                           No
AMD Family 11h thermal sensors...                           No
AMD Family 12h and 14h thermal sensors...                   No
AMD Family 15h thermal sensors...                           No
AMD Family 16h thermal sensors...                           No
AMD Family 15h power sensors...                             No
AMD Family 16h power sensors...                             No
Intel digital thermal sensor...                             No
Intel AMB FB-DIMM thermal sensor...                         No
Intel 5500/5520/X58 thermal sensor...                       No
VIA C7 thermal sensor...                                    No
VIA Nano thermal sensor...                                  No

Some Super I/O chips contain embedded sensors. We have to write to
standard I/O ports to probe them. This is usually safe.
Do you want to scan for Super I/O sensors? (YES/no):
Probing for Super-I/O at 0x2e/0x2f
Trying family `National Semiconductor/ITE'...               No
Trying family `SMSC'...                                     No
Trying family `VIA/Winbond/Nuvoton/Fintek'...               No
Trying family `ITE'...                                      Yes
Found unknown chip with ID 0x8655
    (logical device 4 has address 0x290, could be sensors)
Probing for Super-I/O at 0x4e/0x4f
Trying family `National Semiconductor/ITE'...               No
Trying family `SMSC'...                                     No
Trying family `VIA/Winbond/Nuvoton/Fintek'...               No
Trying family `ITE'...                                      No

Some systems (mainly servers) implement IPMI, a set of common interfaces
through which system health data may be retrieved, amongst other things.
We first try to get the information from SMBIOS. If we don't find it
there, we have to read from arbitrary I/O ports to probe for such
interfaces. This is normally safe. Do you want to scan for IPMI
interfaces? (YES/no):
Probing for `IPMI BMC KCS' at 0xca0...                      No
Probing for `IPMI BMC SMIC' at 0xca8...                     No

Some hardware monitoring chips are accessible through the ISA I/O ports.
We have to write to arbitrary I/O ports to probe them. This is usually
safe though. Yes, you do have ISA I/O ports even if you do not have any
ISA slots! Do you want to scan the ISA I/O ports? (YES/no):
Probing for `National Semiconductor LM78' at 0x290...       Success!
    (confidence 6, driver `lm78')
Probing for `National Semiconductor LM79' at 0x290...       No
Probing for `Winbond W83781D' at 0x290...                   No
Probing for `Winbond W83782D' at 0x290...                   No

Lastly, we can probe the I2C/SMBus adapters for connected hardware
monitoring devices. This is the most risky part, and while it works
reasonably well on most systems, it has been reported to cause trouble
on some systems.
Do you want to probe the I2C/SMBus adapters now? (YES/no):
Found unknown SMBus adapter 1022:790b at 0000:00:14.0.
Sorry, no supported PCI bus adapters found.
Module i2c-dev loaded successfully.

Next adapter: SMBus PIIX4 adapter port 0 at 0b00 (i2c-0)
Do you want to scan it? (YES/no/selectively):
Client found at address 0x52
Probing for `Analog Devices ADM1033'...                     No
Probing for `Analog Devices ADM1034'...                     No
Probing for `SPD EEPROM'...                                 No
Client found at address 0x53
Probing for `Analog Devices ADM1033'...                     No
Probing for `Analog Devices ADM1034'...                     No
Probing for `SPD EEPROM'...                                 No

Next adapter: SMBus PIIX4 adapter port 2 at 0b00 (i2c-1)
Do you want to scan it? (YES/no/selectively):

Next adapter: SMBus PIIX4 adapter port 3 at 0b00 (i2c-2)
Do you want to scan it? (YES/no/selectively):

Next adapter: SMBus PIIX4 adapter port 4 at 0b00 (i2c-3)
Do you want to scan it? (YES/no/selectively):


Now follows a summary of the probes I have just done.
Just press ENTER to continue:

Driver `lm78':
  * ISA bus, address 0x290
    Chip `National Semiconductor LM78' (confidence: 6)

Do you want to generate /etc/sysconfig/lm_sensors? (yes/NO): y
Copy prog/init/lm_sensors.init to /etc/init.d/lm_sensors
for initialization at boot time.
You should now start the lm_sensors service to load the required
kernel modules.

Unloading i2c-dev... OK

Do I need to copy prog/init/lm_sensors.init to /etc/init.d/lm_sensors ?

Link to comment
35 minutes ago, Jack Skellington said:

# sensors-detect revision 6284 (2015-05-31 14:00:33 +0200)
# Board: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. PRIME B350-PLUS
# Kernel: 4.14.26-unRAID x86_64
# Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 1700X Eight-Core Processor (23/1/1)

This program will help you determine which kernel modules you need
to load to use lm_sensors most effectively. It is generally safe
and recommended to accept the default answers to all questions,
unless you know what you're doing.

Some south bridges, CPUs or memory controllers contain embedded sensors.
Do you want to scan for them? This is totally safe. (YES/no):
Silicon Integrated Systems SIS5595...                       No
VIA VT82C686 Integrated Sensors...                          No
VIA VT8231 Integrated Sensors...                            No
AMD K8 thermal sensors...                                   No
AMD Family 10h thermal sensors...                           No
AMD Family 11h thermal sensors...                           No
AMD Family 12h and 14h thermal sensors...                   No
AMD Family 15h thermal sensors...                           No
AMD Family 16h thermal sensors...                           No
AMD Family 15h power sensors...                             No
AMD Family 16h power sensors...                             No
Intel digital thermal sensor...                             No
Intel AMB FB-DIMM thermal sensor...                         No
Intel 5500/5520/X58 thermal sensor...                       No
VIA C7 thermal sensor...                                    No
VIA Nano thermal sensor...                                  No

Some Super I/O chips contain embedded sensors. We have to write to
standard I/O ports to probe them. This is usually safe.
Do you want to scan for Super I/O sensors? (YES/no):
Probing for Super-I/O at 0x2e/0x2f
Trying family `National Semiconductor/ITE'...               No
Trying family `SMSC'...                                     No
Trying family `VIA/Winbond/Nuvoton/Fintek'...               No
Trying family `ITE'...                                      Yes
Found unknown chip with ID 0x8655
    (logical device 4 has address 0x290, could be sensors)
Probing for Super-I/O at 0x4e/0x4f
Trying family `National Semiconductor/ITE'...               No
Trying family `SMSC'...                                     No
Trying family `VIA/Winbond/Nuvoton/Fintek'...               No
Trying family `ITE'...                                      No

Some systems (mainly servers) implement IPMI, a set of common interfaces
through which system health data may be retrieved, amongst other things.
We first try to get the information from SMBIOS. If we don't find it
there, we have to read from arbitrary I/O ports to probe for such
interfaces. This is normally safe. Do you want to scan for IPMI
interfaces? (YES/no):
Probing for `IPMI BMC KCS' at 0xca0...                      No
Probing for `IPMI BMC SMIC' at 0xca8...                     No

Some hardware monitoring chips are accessible through the ISA I/O ports.
We have to write to arbitrary I/O ports to probe them. This is usually
safe though. Yes, you do have ISA I/O ports even if you do not have any
ISA slots! Do you want to scan the ISA I/O ports? (YES/no):
Probing for `National Semiconductor LM78' at 0x290...       Success!
    (confidence 6, driver `lm78')
Probing for `National Semiconductor LM79' at 0x290...       No
Probing for `Winbond W83781D' at 0x290...                   No
Probing for `Winbond W83782D' at 0x290...                   No

Lastly, we can probe the I2C/SMBus adapters for connected hardware
monitoring devices. This is the most risky part, and while it works
reasonably well on most systems, it has been reported to cause trouble
on some systems.
Do you want to probe the I2C/SMBus adapters now? (YES/no):
Found unknown SMBus adapter 1022:790b at 0000:00:14.0.
Sorry, no supported PCI bus adapters found.
Module i2c-dev loaded successfully.

Next adapter: SMBus PIIX4 adapter port 0 at 0b00 (i2c-0)
Do you want to scan it? (YES/no/selectively):
Client found at address 0x52
Probing for `Analog Devices ADM1033'...                     No
Probing for `Analog Devices ADM1034'...                     No
Probing for `SPD EEPROM'...                                 No
Client found at address 0x53
Probing for `Analog Devices ADM1033'...                     No
Probing for `Analog Devices ADM1034'...                     No
Probing for `SPD EEPROM'...                                 No

Next adapter: SMBus PIIX4 adapter port 2 at 0b00 (i2c-1)
Do you want to scan it? (YES/no/selectively):

Next adapter: SMBus PIIX4 adapter port 3 at 0b00 (i2c-2)
Do you want to scan it? (YES/no/selectively):

Next adapter: SMBus PIIX4 adapter port 4 at 0b00 (i2c-3)
Do you want to scan it? (YES/no/selectively):


Now follows a summary of the probes I have just done.
Just press ENTER to continue:

Driver `lm78':
  * ISA bus, address 0x290
    Chip `National Semiconductor LM78' (confidence: 6)

Do you want to generate /etc/sysconfig/lm_sensors? (yes/NO): y
Copy prog/init/lm_sensors.init to /etc/init.d/lm_sensors
for initialization at boot time.
You should now start the lm_sensors service to load the required
kernel modules.

Unloading i2c-dev... OK

Do I need to copy prog/init/lm_sensors.init to /etc/init.d/lm_sensors ?

 

Jack:  run this command:

 

modprobe it87 force_id=0x8620

 

then:

sensors

 

 

 

Link to comment

After reading https://github.com/groeck/it87/issues/11 I was able get my Ryzen CPU temperatures and FAN speeds on Asus B350m board.

I am running this set of commands to get sensor output:

isaset 0x295 0x296 0x06 0x80
sensors-detect --auto
modprobe it87 force_id=0x8620
sensors

isaset command is very important here. I wasn't able to get sensor output without running it.

 

Voltages needs scaling, but I believe CPU temperatures and FAN speeds are correct.

Link to comment
4 hours ago, Anrijs said:

After reading https://github.com/groeck/it87/issues/11 I was able get my Ryzen CPU temperatures and FAN speeds on Asus B350m board.

I am running this set of commands to get sensor output:


isaset 0x295 0x296 0x06 0x80
sensors-detect --auto
modprobe it87 force_id=0x8620
sensors

isaset command is very important here. I wasn't able to get sensor output without running it.

 

Voltages needs scaling, but I believe CPU temperatures and FAN speeds are correct.

 

Is it safe to run the isaset command? 

 

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.