Best router distro for VM


pyrater

Recommended Posts

Pfsense or monowall (there are lots of others but those two are the easiest to get going imho)

 

Sent from my SGH-I727R using Tapatalk 2

 

i believe pfsense is a fork of monowall or vice versa.  I also believe monowall just released an update, so while I never used monowall, I assume, you cant go wrong with either.

 

 

Link to comment

Still use Smoothwall because I haven't touched it in years. It used to have a terrific community but it slowed up a lot a few years back. I'd probably go with pfsense these days (although never ran any in a VM)

 

I was a smoothwall guy till I had to rebuild every time there was an update and it broke the mods.  hoping the new versions brings new life

Link to comment

I feel like Goldilocks

 

untangled = too expensive

pfsense = too limited out of the box

zeroshell = a  pain to set up

sophos = too much

dd-wrt = too limited (multiwan)

 

( for me ) this is not meant to start a flame war, they are all great distros im just being picky lol. I basically want untangled but without the  200.00 per year sub for antivirus and multiwan. Im sure each one could do what i need/want, but i dont want to speed 4 hours hacking it up to make it work.

Link to comment

Don't forget untangle

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

From my experience, untangle uses crazy resources compared to pfsense which is where my vote it. Not to mention it is not completely free if I recall when you want certain plugins.  ipfire is OK, but never got into it too much beyond an install.  Last I recall the plugins lacked.

 

clear OS is another I have messed with,  they have a vm appliance pre made too for esx, so not sure of the conversion to xen, but maybe.  It was very involved, super complex, so it could be good.  pfsense has a smaller learning curve in my opinion

 

 

Link to comment

I feel like Goldilocks

 

untangled = too expensive

pfsense = too limited out of the box

zeroshell = a  pain to set up

sophos = too much

dd-wrt = too limited (multiwan)

 

( for me ) this is not meant to start a flame war, they are all great distros im just being picky lol. I basically want untangled but without the  200.00 per year sub for antivirus and multiwan. Im sure each one could do what i need/want, but i dont want to speed 4 hours hacking it up to make it work.

 

pfsense in my opinion is not limited at all out of the box.  add-ons make it better, but overall it is ready to go.

  • Like 1
Link to comment

I have narrowed it down to pFsense or untangled not sure which one, probably pfsense. Time to dig into addons, multiwan and snort/IDS.

 

On my ESXi 5.5, I use both pfsense and unTangle lite/free in Bridge mode. Both has ESXi VM appliances, so it was pretty simple to setup. pfSense handles Firewall/DHCP/DNS/snort&IDS and unTangle does the UTM stuff. Lots of googling helped since I'm not a network specialist.

Link to comment

I use ClearOS on a small Atom appliance and have for years. I need to upgrade to the newest code but have enjoyed their free version for awhile. I wild like some better reporting and whatnot though for sure. I'd love to find something that logged DNS queries too! Darkstat on unRAID has been handy too.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...

Well, I keep seeing this type of discussion cropping up and I think to myself that I must be missing something interesting here. Sooooo, seeing that pfsense normally wins out, off I go, googling it to try and find out what this mythical beast is all aboot.

 

I start reading the overview and features and I think to myself....I don't get it. I then try to relate to it of what I already know and come up with the same answer...surely my router does all this already...besides the graphing and logging etc, but then I'm not a network administrator for a company, so why would I want to use this at home. I'm sure my cat isn't trying to hack my porn collection!

 

So please, I ask of you, put me out of my ignorance & misery and explain to me the point of this is. In what scenario are you lot using this? I so desperately want to install and try it out, but fear it's going to a) interfere with any normal router I may have and b) take a while to configure for me to simply delete it.

 

Cheers!

A lost soul :D

Link to comment

The beauty of virtualization...you can create as many VMs as you like.  Wanna try pfsense....fire up that VM.  Wanna try ClearOS...shutdown pfSense and fire up the ClearOS one.

 

My advice is to try each one for 2 weeks.  That is what I did (multiple times).  In the end I always come back to pfSense.

 

John

Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Well, I keep seeing this type of discussion cropping up and I think to myself that I must be missing something interesting here. Sooooo, seeing that pfsense normally wins out, off I go, googling it to try and find out what this mythical beast is all aboot.

 

I start reading the overview and features and I think to myself....I don't get it. I then try to relate to it of what I already know and come up with the same answer...surely my router does all this already...besides the graphing and logging etc, but then I'm not a network administrator for a company, so why would I want to use this at home. I'm sure my cat isn't trying to hack my porn collection!

 

So please, I ask of you, put me out of my ignorance & misery and explain to me the point of this is. In what scenario are you lot using this? I so desperately want to install and try it out, but fear it's going to a) interfere with any normal router I may have and b) take a while to configure for me to simply delete it.

 

Cheers!

A lost soul :D

 

Here is a simple scenario: using a VPN service for all and/or some of your traffic.  Most off-the-shelf routers would dramatically slow down (e.g. 30Mbps turns into 6) if you wanted your VPN service running on your router.

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.