/mnt/cache becoming readonly


Recommended Posts

Over the last week or so I've noticed that my crashplan has stopped working. I have it installed at: /mnt/cache/.permanent/crashplan

 

The message I get is that the file system is read_only.  I telnet in and sure enought I cannot create any files on /mnt/cache.  I know that it works for a bit after I restart the array, because I copied a movie over to the cache drive yesterday.  But at some point to becomes read-only.

 

Any ideas on where I can go look?

 

thanks,

david

Link to comment

Yes there is something wrong:

 

Do you want to run this program?[N/Yes] (note need to type Yes if you do):Yes

###########

reiserfsck --check started at Wed Jun 11 11:06:37 2014

###########

Filesystem seems mounted read-only. Skipping journal replay.

Checking internal tree.. \/  1 (of  2|/  2 (of 128|/ 84 (of 158|block 10682570: The level of the node (14624) is not correct, (1) expected

the problem in the internal node occured (10682570), whole subtree is /  2 (of  2\/ 69 (of 104-/110 (of 155|block 5408774: The level of the node (0) is not correct, (1) expected

the problem in the internal node occured (5408774), whole subtree is skipped      / 80 (of 104|/ 59 (of 127\bad_path: The left delimiting key [1096 1119 0x799 DRCT (2)] of the node (16518215) must be equal to the first element's key [1037 1091 0x19678c001 IND (1)] within the node.                    / 90 (of 104\/124 (of 162\block 16177155: The level of the node (60601) is not correct, (1) expected

the problem in the internal node occured (16177155), whole subtree is skipped      / 91 (of 104|block 16179939: The level of the node (46678) is not correct, (2) expected

the problem in the internal node occured (16179939), whole subtree is skipped    finished

Comparing bitmaps..vpf-10640: The on-disk and the correct bitmaps differs.

Bad nodes were found, Semantic pass skipped

5 found corruptions can be fixed only when running with --rebuild-tree

###########

reiserfsck finished at Wed Jun 11 11:08:30 2014

 

So I need to run --rebuild-tree?

 

dave

Link to comment

I ran:

 

reiserfsck --rebuild-tree /dev/sdg1

 

It ran for a few hours then ended like this:

.80%.block 37680309: The number of items (24940) is incorrect, should be (1) - corrected

block 37680309: The free space (0) is incorrect, should be (4048) - corrected

pass0: vpf-10110: block 37680309, item (0): Unknown item type found [126 2781282451 0x174000131100004 ??? (6)] - deleted

...block 39965715: The number of items (36864) is incorrect, should be (1) - corrected

block 39965715: The free space (2321) is incorrect, should be (4048) - corrected

pass0: vpf-10150: block 39965715: item 0: Wrong key [0 2416508928 0x911 SD (0)], deleted

100%                        left 0, 1479 /sec

944 directory entries were hashed with "r5" hash.

        "r5" hash is selected

Flushing..finished

        Read blocks (but not data blocks) 20550800

                Leaves among those 37820

                        - leaves all contents of which could not be saved and deleted 229

                Objectids found 968

 

Pass 1 (will try to insert 37591 leaves):

####### Pass 1 #######

Looking for allocable blocks .. finished

0%...                                                      left 32189, 300 /sec

The problem has occurred looks like a hardware problem (perhaps

memory). Send us the bug report only if the second run dies at

the same place with the same block number.

 

build_the_tree: Nothing but leaves are expected. Block 5197999 - unknown

 

Aborted (core dumped)

 

that doesn't look good,

david

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.