Dockerization of some popular applications.


Recommended Posts

I do add http://

But chrome makes it dissappear

 

Strange I got nzbdrone working

 

Bizarre. I don't really use Chrome, but I know without the http piece browsers can behave strangely with local servers in IE. If you are doing this, and it still doesn't work then I'd begin to wonder about the app you are trying to connect to.

Link to comment

 

I do add http://

But chrome makes it dissappear

 

Strange I got nzbdrone working

 

Bizarre. I don't really use Chrome, but I know without the http piece browsers can behave strangely with local servers in IE. If you are doing this, and it still doesn't work then I'd begin to wonder about the app you are trying to connect to.

 

I was hoping to get this working and try nzbget.  I will go back sabnzbd.  Which I had it working. 

 

 

Sent from my Bphone using the magic cloud through tapatalk

Link to comment

does anyone else have any problems with sickbeard/couchpotato sending a refresh notice to plex?

I always get a 401 error. But if I run the same api command from my browser, plex refreshes the section. there seems to be something funny with the networksettings of the plex-container, i think...

I'll try more this evening...

 

I was wrong. For couchpotato to talk to Plex please add --net="host" to the docker run line for CouchPotato.

Link to comment

I do add http://

But chrome makes it dissappear

Strange I got nzbdrone working

 

With nzbget running if you run:

 

netstat -anp | grep 6789

 

What returns?

 

I get ths

 

root@UNRAID:~# netstat -anp | grep 6789
tcp        0      0 0.0.0.0:6789            0.0.0.0:*               LISTEN      1784/docker
root@UNRAID:~#

Link to comment

I get ths

root@UNRAID:~# netstat -anp | grep 6789
tcp        0      0 0.0.0.0:6789            0.0.0.0:*               LISTEN      1784/docker
root@UNRAID:~#

 

Odd. That means it is running and accepting connections. Mine looks identical to yours.

Link to comment

Deluge is now connecting to the thin client. Thank you, thank you! Now. Downloading. I can get it to download to the specified directory "/mnt/cache/appdata/deluge/downloads:/downloads" just fine, but when it moves the completed file to "/mnt/user/Files/Downloads" it does indeed move it, but to the ether. I can't find where it's putting the files and the logs are no help. What is it doing with the data?

 

Note: If I try to have it download the data anywhere other than a directory in the /config directory, it will not download at all.

Link to comment

Deluge is now connecting to the thin client. Thank you, thank you! Now. Downloading. I can get it to download to the specified directory "/mnt/cache/appdata/deluge/downloads:/downloads" just fine, but when it moves the completed file to "/mnt/user/Files/Downloads" it does indeed move it, but to the ether. I can't find where it's putting the files and the logs are no help. What is it doing with the data?

 

Unless you have mounted "/mnt/user/Files/Downloads" in Docker it is moving it within the container itself. If you add -v /mnt/user/Files/Downloads:/mnt/user/Files/Downloads it should fix your issue.

Link to comment

I am seriously considering making the jump and converting everything to phusion/baseimage. Based on what I have learned in the [POLL] thread.

 

Any strong thoughts one way or the other?

 

If this will get us around the issue of updating/restarting the apps without having restart the container then I am all for it.

Link to comment

I am seriously considering making the jump and converting everything to phusion/baseimage. Based on what I have learned in the [POLL] thread.

 

Any strong thoughts one way or the other?

 

If this will get us around the issue of updating/restarting the apps without having restart the container then I am all for it.

I do not support updating live apps. It's a recipe for disaster.

Link to comment

I am seriously considering making the jump and converting everything to phusion/baseimage. Based on what I have learned in the [POLL] thread.

 

Any strong thoughts one way or the other?

 

If this will get us around the issue of updating/restarting the apps without having restart the container then I am all for it.

I do not support updating live apps. It's a recipe for disaster.

 

Okay, I am going to refrain from chasing you around two separate threads. :)

 

I posted a long winded question in the other docker discussion, so I will let you answer there.

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.