June 24, 201412 yr Author when i attempt to open a browser and enter location of "unraid:6789 or 192.68.2.99" I get "oops google chrome cannot connect" You connect at http://Tower:6789 (Or whatever your unRAID is called)
June 24, 201412 yr strange that this will not let me connect, tried different browsers too you are adding the http:// to your syntax correct? unraid:6789 or 192.68.2.99:6789 will often not work. You need http://unraid:6789
June 24, 201412 yr I do add http:// But chrome makes it dissappear Strange I got nzbdrone working Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
June 24, 201412 yr I do add http:// But chrome makes it dissappear Strange I got nzbdrone working Bizarre. I don't really use Chrome, but I know without the http piece browsers can behave strangely with local servers in IE. If you are doing this, and it still doesn't work then I'd begin to wonder about the app you are trying to connect to.
June 24, 201412 yr I do add http:// But chrome makes it dissappear Strange I got nzbdrone working Bizarre. I don't really use Chrome, but I know without the http piece browsers can behave strangely with local servers in IE. If you are doing this, and it still doesn't work then I'd begin to wonder about the app you are trying to connect to. I was hoping to get this working and try nzbget. I will go back sabnzbd. Which I had it working. Sent from my Bphone using the magic cloud through tapatalk
June 24, 201412 yr Author I do add http:// But chrome makes it dissappear Strange I got nzbdrone working With nzbget running if you run: netstat -anp | grep 6789 What returns?
June 24, 201412 yr Author does anyone else have any problems with sickbeard/couchpotato sending a refresh notice to plex? I always get a 401 error. But if I run the same api command from my browser, plex refreshes the section. there seems to be something funny with the networksettings of the plex-container, i think... I'll try more this evening... I was wrong. For couchpotato to talk to Plex please add --net="host" to the docker run line for CouchPotato.
June 24, 201412 yr I do add http:// But chrome makes it dissappear Strange I got nzbdrone working With nzbget running if you run: netstat -anp | grep 6789 What returns? I get ths root@UNRAID:~# netstat -anp | grep 6789 tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:6789 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1784/docker root@UNRAID:~#
June 24, 201412 yr @needo your MariaDB, is it 5.5 or 10.0 version? 5.5 Any chance you can do a 10.0.10 version?
June 24, 201412 yr Author I get ths root@UNRAID:~# netstat -anp | grep 6789 tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:6789 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 1784/docker root@UNRAID:~# Odd. That means it is running and accepting connections. Mine looks identical to yours.
June 24, 201412 yr Author @needo your MariaDB, is it 5.5 or 10.0 version? 5.5 Any chance you can do a 10.0.10 version? I'll see what I can do.
June 24, 201412 yr Deluge is now connecting to the thin client. Thank you, thank you! Now. Downloading. I can get it to download to the specified directory "/mnt/cache/appdata/deluge/downloads:/downloads" just fine, but when it moves the completed file to "/mnt/user/Files/Downloads" it does indeed move it, but to the ether. I can't find where it's putting the files and the logs are no help. What is it doing with the data? Note: If I try to have it download the data anywhere other than a directory in the /config directory, it will not download at all.
June 24, 201412 yr Author Deluge is now connecting to the thin client. Thank you, thank you! Now. Downloading. I can get it to download to the specified directory "/mnt/cache/appdata/deluge/downloads:/downloads" just fine, but when it moves the completed file to "/mnt/user/Files/Downloads" it does indeed move it, but to the ether. I can't find where it's putting the files and the logs are no help. What is it doing with the data? Unless you have mounted "/mnt/user/Files/Downloads" in Docker it is moving it within the container itself. If you add -v /mnt/user/Files/Downloads:/mnt/user/Files/Downloads it should fix your issue.
June 24, 201412 yr I've taken to doing -v /mnt/user:/mnt/user in all my run commands. This just let's me navigate all programs with /mnt/user, just like I'm used to doing. I don't do :/downloads or :/TV in any dockers, just the /mnt/user, and it works great in all dockers I've tried. FWIW
June 24, 201412 yr I can't figure out for the life of me why this doesn't work I deleted the container and removed the image, I tried a different docker file from aostanin/nzbget it fired up no problem the first run. now to muddle my way through something different
June 24, 201412 yr Trying to configure nzbdrone. I'm trying to add SABnzbd. I enter localhost and 8080 and the API, and when I hit Test, I always get [testsabnzbd] Failed. Any idea what I need to do different to get nzbdrone to control SAB?
June 24, 201412 yr Trying to configure nzbdrone. I'm trying to add SABnzbd. I enter localhost and 8080 and the API, and when I hit Test, I always get [testsabnzbd] Failed. Any idea what I need to do different to get nzbdrone to control SAB? Enter the IP of unRAID, not localhost
June 25, 201412 yr Author I am seriously considering making the jump and converting everything to phusion/baseimage. Based on what I have learned in the [POLL] thread. Any strong thoughts one way or the other?
June 25, 201412 yr I am seriously considering making the jump and converting everything to phusion/baseimage. Based on what I have learned in the [POLL] thread. Any strong thoughts one way or the other? If this will get us around the issue of updating/restarting the apps without having restart the container then I am all for it.
June 25, 201412 yr Author I am seriously considering making the jump and converting everything to phusion/baseimage. Based on what I have learned in the [POLL] thread. Any strong thoughts one way or the other? If this will get us around the issue of updating/restarting the apps without having restart the container then I am all for it. I do not support updating live apps. It's a recipe for disaster.
June 25, 201412 yr I am seriously considering making the jump and converting everything to phusion/baseimage. Based on what I have learned in the [POLL] thread. Any strong thoughts one way or the other? If this will get us around the issue of updating/restarting the apps without having restart the container then I am all for it. I do not support updating live apps. It's a recipe for disaster. Okay, I am going to refrain from chasing you around two separate threads. I posted a long winded question in the other docker discussion, so I will let you answer there.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.