thaddeussmith Posted August 28, 2014 Share Posted August 28, 2014 Thats the first time I have seen a screenshot as a quote but I am going to second the beets request and bump it directly to the voting list here: http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=34549.0 it really is that good and likely a natural fit for unRAID type people. i figured it would add some credibility to my 36 post count. Quote Link to comment
peter_sm Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 Hi, A docker (red hat base image) for various VM manager would be great! I had a small discusion about this with Jonp earlier.... Example virt-manager AQemu oVirt ConVirt More VM manager in below list http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Management_Tools Thanks! BR Peter Quote Link to comment
dalben Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 I like the idea of a "PirateShip" docker like this one: https://github.com/GeoffreyPlitt/docker-pirateship Having moved to sickrage and nzbdrone, this particular pirateship doesn't do it for me. But the idea is very cool I reckon Quote Link to comment
NAS Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 i dont get it... the vm requirement seems like a necessary kludge to me? Quote Link to comment
dalben Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 After reading it deeper I frealised it's not waht I'm thinking of. I thought of 1 docker container that has nzbdrone, sickrage, couch potato, transmission, flexget and headphones all together. So instead of needed 6 containers, I just use 1. They all pretty much work together to produce a desired result. I'm assuming as single container would mean less HD requirement and less memory requirement. But maybe I don't understand the unerlying advantages of Docker and it makes no sense. Quote Link to comment
thegizzard Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 Re: Apcupsd I have this installed via unmenu. I don't think it's working right. I only get emails when power is restored. Should I be using a plugin instead? If so, where can I find it? Quote Link to comment
NAS Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 After reading it deeper I frealised it's not waht I'm thinking of. I thought of 1 docker container that has nzbdrone, sickrage, couch potato, transmission, flexget and headphones all together. So instead of needed 6 containers, I just use 1. They all pretty much work together to produce a desired result. I'm assuming as single container would mean less HD requirement and less memory requirement. But maybe I don't understand the unerlying advantages of Docker and it makes no sense. I think you have the ember of a good idea but are bringing a bit of "old skool VM baggage to the party" as they say Docker should ideally be one container one thing. It doesnt techncially have to be but it should. That way if say you want two nzbdrones you can just run the same container twice with a single command line change. This touches on where the uNRAID addon works well as the templates allow you to start a generic container is a way that is specific to your requirements. The next logical step would be meta templates which essentially bring a suite a suite of containers online in a way that they all work together. It is far from impossible and likely something that will happen I would guess. p.s. one containier doing 6 things is pretty much the same as 6 containers doing one thing..... thats another major advantage docker brings to the table over VMs. Quote Link to comment
thegizzard Posted August 30, 2014 Share Posted August 30, 2014 Re: Apcupsd I have this installed via unmenu. I don't think it's working right. I only get emails when power is restored. Should I be using a plugin instead? If so, where can I find it? Nevermind this... turns out I had one important device not attached to my UPS... my network switch... that way the only message that went out was the one when power was restored. Sorted. Nothing to see here Quote Link to comment
dcoens Posted September 6, 2014 Share Posted September 6, 2014 No more off topic posts please Okay Has anyone tried making a docker for makeMKV? I know there is a linux version, but it looks like it needs compiled, and they usually have a new version about once/month, so it probably will need 'constant' maintenance. I'm not sure if building one will be easy or good, but I'd really like to put the work of creating my mkv files onto my unRAID box, and not have to continue doing it on my laptop, over wifi, which takes forever. maybe this helps one get started... http://www.makemkv.com/forum2/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=2047 I have latest makemkvcon installed on unraid, still playing with it........ But it looks good. Has there been progress on the makemkv docker or otherwise? Quote Link to comment
generalz Posted September 6, 2014 Share Posted September 6, 2014 dropbox. one that has a template does not work. Quote Link to comment
deaerator Posted September 7, 2014 Share Posted September 7, 2014 How about a XBMC PVR BACKEND. ie - tvheadend, vdr, mythtv Quote Link to comment
dcoens Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 How about a pxe server Did you try this: http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=31297.0 ? I will create a badass PXE Server that uses Tiny Core Linux and a HTTP Server (faster than tftpboot) for Menus and isos / images. I will work on it tomorrow and post it for all of you to test. Perhaps gfjardim wouldn't mind creating a slick WebGUI for adding / removing images and configuring the PXE Menu. I can get it close but he will need to take it the last mile. NOTE: I am not going to support this long term so one of you will have to take it and own it. Looking forward for your new PXE Server, I'm using the tftp one based on your instructions posted several months ago and I'm very happy with it. Thank you! I also am currently using the PXE Server and boot clonezilla via PXE along with a couple of other apps. I came across this and this would be an excellent PXE server and HD cloning utility. Is there an docker expert that could roll this into a docker format? http://www.fogproject.org/ Quote Link to comment
drnackers Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 How about a XBMC PVR BACKEND. ie - tvheadend, vdr, mythtv +1 - Only thing i am missing now is a TVHeadend or VDR Quote Link to comment
gfjardim Posted September 8, 2014 Share Posted September 8, 2014 dropbox. one that has a template does not work. If you never complain, it never gets fixed.... I think I fixed it. Please try again. Quote Link to comment
generalz Posted September 9, 2014 Share Posted September 9, 2014 dropbox. one that has a template does not work. If you never complain, it never gets fixed.... I think I fixed it. Please try again. i did, just in the wrong area http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=33965.msg323085#msg323085 I removed and re-added and move some files around and it seems to be stable this time, thanks! Quote Link to comment
vlefevre86 Posted September 22, 2014 Share Posted September 22, 2014 +TVhead I wonder... Is it even doable? Can we pass the tuner to the container? Quote Link to comment
generalz Posted September 22, 2014 Share Posted September 22, 2014 +TVhead I wonder... Is it even doable? Can we pass the tuner to the container? For people with a network tuner. IE hd homerun Quote Link to comment
gfjardim Posted September 22, 2014 Share Posted September 22, 2014 +TVhead I wonder... Is it even doable? Can we pass the tuner to the container? Yes, it's possible, but you will need to recompile the unRAID kernel for multimedia support and install the tuner driver in the host, not in the docker container. Quote Link to comment
cirkator Posted September 22, 2014 Share Posted September 22, 2014 I just installed the Syncthing template from gfjardim but i can not connect to the web-ui. I get the "no connection possible" error in Chrome and Firefox. It is set to port 8080, i tried it with 8080 or changing the redirect to another port. All redirects for my other dockers are working. Could this be because unMENU is already using 8080?! Any logs i can provide? Sep 22 23:45:01 conchulio php: /usr/bin/docker stop Syncthing Sep 22 23:45:02 conchulio php: Syncthing Sep 22 23:45:02 conchulio php: Sep 22 23:45:02 conchulio avahi-daemon[2286]: Withdrawing workstation service for veth0b90. Sep 22 23:45:03 conchulio kernel: docker0: port 6(veth0b90) entered disabled state Sep 22 23:45:03 conchulio kernel: device veth0b90 left promiscuous mode Sep 22 23:45:03 conchulio kernel: docker0: port 6(veth0b90) entered disabled state Sep 22 23:45:13 conchulio php: /usr/bin/docker start Syncthing Sep 22 23:45:13 conchulio kernel: device vethcac0 entered promiscuous mode Sep 22 23:45:13 conchulio kernel: docker0: port 6(vethcac0) entered forwarding state Sep 22 23:45:13 conchulio kernel: docker0: port 6(vethcac0) entered forwarding state Sep 22 23:45:13 conchulio kernel: docker0: port 6(vethcac0) entered disabled state Sep 22 23:45:13 conchulio avahi-daemon[2286]: Withdrawing workstation service for veth01b9. Sep 22 23:45:13 conchulio kernel: docker0: port 6(vethcac0) entered forwarding state Sep 22 23:45:13 conchulio kernel: docker0: port 6(vethcac0) entered forwarding state Sep 22 23:45:13 conchulio php: Syncthing Sep 22 23:45:13 conchulio php: Sep 22 23:45:28 conchulio kernel: docker0: port 6(vethcac0) entered forwarding state Quote Link to comment
gfjardim Posted September 23, 2014 Share Posted September 23, 2014 I just installed the Syncthing template from gfjardim but i can not connect to the web-ui. I get the "no connection possible" error in Chrome and Firefox. It is set to port 8080, i tried it with 8080 or changing the redirect to another port. All redirects for my other dockers are working. Could this be because unMENU is already using 8080?! Any logs i can provide? Sep 22 23:45:01 conchulio php: /usr/bin/docker stop Syncthing Sep 22 23:45:02 conchulio php: Syncthing Sep 22 23:45:02 conchulio php: Sep 22 23:45:02 conchulio avahi-daemon[2286]: Withdrawing workstation service for veth0b90. Sep 22 23:45:03 conchulio kernel: docker0: port 6(veth0b90) entered disabled state Sep 22 23:45:03 conchulio kernel: device veth0b90 left promiscuous mode Sep 22 23:45:03 conchulio kernel: docker0: port 6(veth0b90) entered disabled state Sep 22 23:45:13 conchulio php: /usr/bin/docker start Syncthing Sep 22 23:45:13 conchulio kernel: device vethcac0 entered promiscuous mode Sep 22 23:45:13 conchulio kernel: docker0: port 6(vethcac0) entered forwarding state Sep 22 23:45:13 conchulio kernel: docker0: port 6(vethcac0) entered forwarding state Sep 22 23:45:13 conchulio kernel: docker0: port 6(vethcac0) entered disabled state Sep 22 23:45:13 conchulio avahi-daemon[2286]: Withdrawing workstation service for veth01b9. Sep 22 23:45:13 conchulio kernel: docker0: port 6(vethcac0) entered forwarding state Sep 22 23:45:13 conchulio kernel: docker0: port 6(vethcac0) entered forwarding state Sep 22 23:45:13 conchulio php: Syncthing Sep 22 23:45:13 conchulio php: Sep 22 23:45:28 conchulio kernel: docker0: port 6(vethcac0) entered forwarding state If your unMenu is set to use port 8080, you should set the host port of the container to anything but. Just remembering, Syncthing uses HTTPS in the webui. Quote Link to comment
generalz Posted September 24, 2014 Share Posted September 24, 2014 You can change the umenu port to mine runs on 81 Quote Link to comment
cirkator Posted September 24, 2014 Share Posted September 24, 2014 Haven't tried https, will do that. If not, I'll change the unmenu port. Thanks Quote Link to comment
cirkator Posted September 24, 2014 Share Posted September 24, 2014 I have changed the unmenu port to 81. But i still get "page unavailable" for syncthing. Doesnt matter if i use port 8080 (with or without https) or if i redirect the port to say 44444 and try with or without https. Any ideas? Is it working for anybody else? Quote Link to comment
gfjardim Posted September 24, 2014 Share Posted September 24, 2014 I have changed the unmenu port to 81. But i still get "page unavailable" for syncthing. Doesnt matter if i use port 8080 (with or without https) or if i redirect the port to say 44444 and try with or without https. Any ideas? Is it working for anybody else? Please post the log of your container. (Please open another thread.) Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.