Pducharme Posted November 7, 2014 Share Posted November 7, 2014 Hi, MediaBrowserServer now have tons of new features, but it's still in Beta. How can we can the docker to get that version ?? Details on the new features : http://mediabrowser.tv/community/index.php?/blog/1/entry-130-media-browser-server-305416-beta-released/ Quote Link to comment
StevenD Posted November 7, 2014 Share Posted November 7, 2014 I would prefer gfjardim's docker NOT be updated! Trakt is broken in 5390 and newer. The official docker will update to the latest version. Quote Link to comment
NAS Posted November 7, 2014 Share Posted November 7, 2014 I think this highlights again why users should be by default given docker containers with software tagged stable only and there be a separate process for users to manually opt in to any beta/testing cycles. Quote Link to comment
Pducharme Posted November 7, 2014 Author Share Posted November 7, 2014 I think there should be a way to tag the Version we want (by using a Variable?) or a different docker tree (ex: gfjardim/MediaBrowserServer:Beta instead of gfjardim/MediaBrowserServer:latest). This way, people that want to run the new stuff in Beta could do it, and people that prefer the Stable could have it too. Quote Link to comment
NAS Posted November 7, 2014 Share Posted November 7, 2014 thats exactly how docker tags work. the problem is once a dev adopts deploying a beta they inherently have to update very often ad nausium. that is no small responsibility to take on Quote Link to comment
hurricanehrndz Posted November 7, 2014 Share Posted November 7, 2014 Hi, MediaBrowserServer now have tons of new features, but it's still in Beta. How can we can the docker to get that version ?? Details on the new features : http://mediabrowser.tv/community/index.php?/blog/1/entry-130-media-browser-server-305416-beta-released/ MediaBrowser has its own repo too and it's kept up to date as much as possible. At least I try. If you have some request on the image itself concerning the official mediabrowser repo, please let me know and I will try and update it or address your concerns. Quote Link to comment
Pducharme Posted November 9, 2014 Author Share Posted November 9, 2014 Hi, MediaBrowserServer now have tons of new features, but it's still in Beta. How can we can the docker to get that version ?? Details on the new features : http://mediabrowser.tv/community/index.php?/blog/1/entry-130-media-browser-server-305416-beta-released/ MediaBrowser has its own repo too and it's kept up to date as much as possible. At least I try. If you have some request on the image itself concerning the official mediabrowser repo, please let me know and I will try and update it or address your concerns. What's the difference between the official repo and the gfjardim one? Does the official repo works well on Unraid too ? If so, why having another one ?! Quote Link to comment
hurricanehrndz Posted November 9, 2014 Share Posted November 9, 2014 Official repo, is made by me and I build it in conjunction with the developers of mediabrowser. Once they let me know they are ready to build a new beta or new stable release I start my work. So the official repo is updated every time a release by mediabrowser is made. The base image is a big difference, but other than that I don't see much of a difference. If you want something that is updated regularly go with the official repo one, the official repo one runs by default as user nobody so it it compatible with unRAID. The readme instructions are a little outdate, and I will update them soon. Just remember that the config volume is /config Quote Link to comment
Pducharme Posted November 10, 2014 Author Share Posted November 10, 2014 Official repo, is made by me and I build it in conjunction with the developers of mediabrowser. Once they let me know they are ready to build a new beta or new stable release I start my work. So the official repo is updated every time a release by mediabrowser is made. The base image is a big difference, but other than that I don't see much of a difference. If you want something that is updated regularly go with the official repo one, the official repo one runs by default as user nobody so it it compatible with unRAID. The readme instructions are a little outdate, and I will update them soon. Just remember that the config volume is /config Anything special if I want to move from the Unraid docker to your Official docker? I guess I just need to point to my current config and map the same unraid folder I already have If I want to avoid a full rescan? Quote Link to comment
Pducharme Posted November 10, 2014 Author Share Posted November 10, 2014 It was easy to switch! thanks. I just had to change the repo to mediabrowser/mbserver and it works Quote Link to comment
hurricanehrndz Posted November 10, 2014 Share Posted November 10, 2014 Your very welcome. Quote Link to comment
hurricanehrndz Posted March 19, 2015 Share Posted March 19, 2015 This has been updated to latest beta release. Quote Link to comment
ijuarez Posted April 21, 2015 Share Posted April 21, 2015 I just pulled the latest from the repo. I was using cpu pinning to deal with the high cpu usage of media browser. however when i try to pinn a cpu the command fails i am using --cpuset=3 mediabrowser/mbserver it fails on this. before this beta it was running just great. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.