coppit Posted March 3, 2007 Share Posted March 3, 2007 Here's my unRAID server setup: CPU: Intel Celeron D 331 Prescott 2.66GHz Case: Raidmax Ares ATX-801WBP MB: Asus P5PE-VM Memory: 1 GB PC 3200 (1 stick) PCI SATA II Controller: Promise SATA300 TX4 PCI SATA II USB Stick: Sony Micro Vault Tiny 512MB Flash Drive Parity Drive: WD5000AAKS 500GB SATA II (on Promise controller) Data Drives: Two Maxtor 6V300F0 300GB SATA II (on Promise controller), One Western Digital WD2500JB 250GB drive on motherboard PATA controller The system probably cost $320 from Newegg (I had some parts already). I'm shipping data across gigabit ethernet from an Athlon 64 3500, Abit AV8 machine across 2 Netgear Gigabit switches to my HTPC. My 64K results: SATA II READSATA II WRITEIDE READIDE WRITE 32MB33.91331.43637.87929.381 64MB35.00833.13737.03025.420 128MB35.57326.57838.86325.832 256MB36.47525.21141.69025.724 512MB42.17125.49644.17325.488 1GB8.35616.2918.29016.930 As with others, I'm seeing faster writes for some reason... Quote Link to comment
TheMaster Posted March 3, 2007 Author Share Posted March 3, 2007 It has been a while since I posted here, so a quick update on the system that started this thread. The server has been running for 3 months now, and has never required a reboot or other maintenanance of any kind. Definitely a rock-solid stable configuration. I still believe the components specified are driving the strong benchmarks, but believe performance is limited by the less-than-stellar hard drives. I would love to run this with a 10k RPM RAPTOR 150 in the Parity and Tested Drive positions. I actually had an opportunity to do this, with two 150s I had purchased for a new system build, but didn't want to screw up my array for the sake of a single benchmark (I do, after all, use this for storage and not just benchmarks!). Is there an easy way to pull your data array drives, test a completely different configuration and then plug your data drives back in? I don't really know if the thumb drive has data written to it specific to your configuration or if this information is stored exclusively on the drives in your array. Quote Link to comment
Joe L. Posted March 3, 2007 Share Posted March 3, 2007 In versions 3.x onward of unRaid the entire configuration is stored on the USB flash drive in the "config" folder. Nothing is stored on the parity/data disks except for the parity and data. (1.x and 2.x versions of unRaid kept the disk configuration in a second hidden partition on the USB flash drive, those are a bit harder to back up) So... you could back up the files on the flash drive "config" folder, stop the array and shut down, swap out the hard disks, perform a reset configuration and be up and running for your tests. Obviously, the new disk will need to be cleared and formatted. Then, swap back the old hard disks, put back the contents of your USB drive "config" folder and be back to your old configuration. It should simply restart when booted. Joe L. Quote Link to comment
TheMaster Posted March 3, 2007 Author Share Posted March 3, 2007 Thanks, Joe- I'll hang on to this in case the opportunity (and time) presents itself to test some blazing fast hard drives to up the performance even further! Quote Link to comment
Suse User Posted March 15, 2007 Share Posted March 15, 2007 Thanks for this thread, it's been a big help in choosing bits for my next UnRaid. New Motherboard: ASUS P5LD2-VM R2.0 $91.18 at Buy.com with Google Checkout Motherboard Capabilities: [*]4 Onboard Serial ATA II (300MB/s) Ports - Recognized by unRAID <snip> I went for this MOBO but inadvertently bought the P5LD2 SE R2.0, I only have 1 Sata HDD of my 3 (connected to SATA1-3) detected. That 1 is listed as "/dev/hdb (hdb1) PATA:ST3500461AS". Did you have any initial problems getting the satas on the Mobo visible? Are there any BIOS settings you can share than may help? If you can help, I've posted a thread about my problem Here, thanks. Also, I bought the 5 into 3 caddy & case you went for, but I had to do some surgery to the case to get the caddy in. Does the US variant if the case fit the caddy straight off? or Did you have to do some bending/modification to the internal 5.25" bays? Thanks, Mark. Quote Link to comment
TheMaster Posted March 15, 2007 Author Share Posted March 15, 2007 Mark: The motherboard I specified uses a controller whose SATA ports were immediately visable to unRAID. Suggest you check the SATA controller used on the model you purchased and check for compatability with UNRAID. I know the options are listed on the lime-technology site if you search. I believe there are two specific controllers supported, one is the Intel ICH5 (?) and I cannot recall the other. Regarding the 5 in 3 module, Yes - I did have to bend the sheetmetal tabs back that would support individual 5-1/4" devices in a normal configuration. Quote Link to comment
coppit Posted March 21, 2007 Share Posted March 21, 2007 I built a server that uses an Asus P5PE-VM. My performance numbers aren't as good as the ones cited here. I think the problems might be related to PCI versus PCI-e. I heard that a gigabit NIC can saturate PCI, resulting in a little better than 1/2 of full network performance. This would certainly coincide with what I'm seeing. So maybe the moral is get a m/b with PCI-e? Quote Link to comment
dennisy Posted May 1, 2007 Share Posted May 1, 2007 Not sure what these numbers mean. I put together a temporary unRaid using s MSI K8NGM2-FID with a Athlon 3800x2 and 1 gig (Patriot Signature Series 1GB (2 x 512MB) 184-Pin DDR SDRAM DDR 400 (PC 3200) Dual Channel) memory, with 3 Segate 500g SATAII drives to replace a failed P4P800 system. Using DUMeter I hit 48Mb UL max and sustained 46-48Mb DL. Quote Link to comment
Billped Posted May 1, 2007 Share Posted May 1, 2007 By themselves, those numbers don't mean much as you could just be measuring the speed of the cache. Bill Quote Link to comment
dennisy Posted May 22, 2007 Share Posted May 22, 2007 TheMaster- I'm curious how well you like the IcyDock 5-in-3. I've been going back and forth between that one and the AMS DS-3151 http://www.newegg.com/product/product.asp?item=N82E16817332011 and can't decide which one I want. I'm kind leaning towards the AMS because when looking at the pictures of the extra trays for both units on newegg, the AMS trays look like they would be a bit more stable compared to the IcyDock. AMS looks like support on 3 sides whereas the IcyDock are simply rails with a center support. Extra trays: IcyDock http://www.newegg.com/product/product.asp?item=N82E16817994042 AMS http://www.newegg.com/product/product.asp?item=N82E16817999007 Have you had any problem with the rails slipping when inserting or removing trays? The only concern I have on the AMS unit is I'm wondering if the individual power buttons for each of the drives needs to be pushed to apply power to each of the drives whenever the server is powered up. Thanks Dennis Quote Link to comment
TheMaster Posted May 22, 2007 Author Share Posted May 22, 2007 I personally like the aesthetics of the Icy Dock. They are solidly constructed. My only issue with it was the fact that on my particular case there are support tabs in the sheetmetal which the drives would normally rest on. These had to be bent out of the way for the 5 in 3 unit to fit into the case. Of course, the AMS unit would have the same issue based on the images. Quote Link to comment
WeeboTech Posted May 23, 2007 Share Posted May 23, 2007 Another point to consider, some of the icy docks have compatible external cases, so if need be, you can remove a drive from the cage and put it in a single external case. Quote Link to comment
dennisy Posted May 23, 2007 Share Posted May 23, 2007 Thanks for the replies. Now you have me leaning back towards the ICY Docks. (Saying they are secure turned me back). The first time I built up my unRaid, back at 2.x, I bought 3 additional 4in3 modules for my stacker case. Saved some money but what a pain to change drives. Now that I need to replace the P4P800 MB, I figure I buy the backplane solution. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.