Gico Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 I have a problem pulling any of LinuxServer docker images. Error pulling image (latest) from linuxserver/mariadb, endpoint: https://registry-1.docker.io/v1/, HTTP code 400. Error pulling image (latest) from linuxserver/mariadb, HTTP code 400. TOTAL DATA PULLED: 0 B Any way to see log/debug the pull request? Alternatively how can I manually pull and install the docker images? It's been like that for weeks and I'm quite desperate here. Other dockers, even from the same docker hub server, are pulled successfully. Thanks. Quote Link to comment
CHBMB Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 The best we can say is that it's an issue with dockerhub. Why it is affecting our containers and nobody elses I can't say. Usually with these issues it works after a little while, but if you've been having the problem for weeks that's unusual. What are your DNS settings? Quote Link to comment
Gico Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 Not only your containers. Can't pull mace's Qbittorrent docker too. DNS is set to my router's ip address, but I changed it to Google's DNS servers and no change - still can't pool your docker images. I can pull other images from dockerhub so the DNS was a long shot anyway. I tried dockerhub forums, and will try again, but is the another way to download a docker image and install it? I don't know anything about unix, but the installation command is in the log so I guess it can be run manually (?). Quote Link to comment
sparklyballs Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 Not only your containers. Can't pull mace's Qbittorrent docker too. DNS is set to my router's ip address, but I changed it to Google's DNS servers and no change - still can't pool your docker images. I can pull other images from dockerhub so the DNS was a long shot anyway. I tried dockerhub forums, and will try again, but is the another way to download a docker image and install it? I don't know anything about unix, but the installation command is in the log so I guess it can be run manually (?). i think this may be related to this email from dockerhub Dear Docker Hub User, TL;DR: If you use Pull-By-Digest, remember to upgrade to Docker Engine 1.10 by June 1st 2016. On June 1st, 2016, we're upgrading Docker Hub to support the newest version of the Docker image manifest format. This will allow us to support images in multiple architectures and for multiple operating systems later. This upgrade also changes how Pull-By-Digest works. This means that older Docker engine versions (1.7 to 1.9) won't be able to use Pull-By-Digest for images published by newer Docker versions (1.10 and later). We see that you're using Pull-By-Digest with an older version of Docker Engine. If you don't upgrade, you'll only be able to use pull-by-digest on images published by older versions of Docker, and you’ll need to change your pull method to specify individual tags for some Docker images. We want you to be able to use your preferred pull method on images published by any Docker version. To do this, you should upgrade to Docker Engine 1.10 by June 1st, 2016. You can download Docker 1.10 here: https://www.docker.com/products/docker-toolbox For more information on Image Manifest Version 2, Schema 2, please visit: https://github.com/docker/distribution/blob/master/docs/spec/manifest-v2-2.md Thank you, The Docker Hub Team Quote Link to comment
CHBMB Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 Long story short. The version of docker on Unraid 6.1.9 is the problem then.... Quote Link to comment
CHBMB Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 Would uncoupling docker from Unraid be a good idea. Like as dynamix? Quote Link to comment
Gico Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 Not only your containers. Can't pull mace's Qbittorrent docker too. DNS is set to my router's ip address, but I changed it to Google's DNS servers and no change - still can't pool your docker images. I can pull other images from dockerhub so the DNS was a long shot anyway. I tried dockerhub forums, and will try again, but is the another way to download a docker image and install it? I don't know anything about unix, but the installation command is in the log so I guess it can be run manually (?). i think this may be related to this email from dockerhub Dear Docker Hub User, TL;DR: If you use Pull-By-Digest, remember to upgrade to Docker Engine 1.10 by June 1st 2016. On June 1st, 2016, we're upgrading Docker Hub to support the newest version of the Docker image manifest format. This will allow us to support images in multiple architectures and for multiple operating systems later. This upgrade also changes how Pull-By-Digest works. This means that older Docker engine versions (1.7 to 1.9) won't be able to use Pull-By-Digest for images published by newer Docker versions (1.10 and later). We see that you're using Pull-By-Digest with an older version of Docker Engine. If you don't upgrade, you'll only be able to use pull-by-digest on images published by older versions of Docker, and you’ll need to change your pull method to specify individual tags for some Docker images. We want you to be able to use your preferred pull method on images published by any Docker version. To do this, you should upgrade to Docker Engine 1.10 by June 1st, 2016. You can download Docker 1.10 here: https://www.docker.com/products/docker-toolbox For more information on Image Manifest Version 2, Schema 2, please visit: https://github.com/docker/distribution/blob/master/docs/spec/manifest-v2-2.md Thank you, The Docker Hub Team hallelujah! Thanks a lot. I'll wait and see if any solution will be agreed upon following this discovery. Edit: New thread created in "Docker Engine" forum regarding this issue. Quote Link to comment
CHBMB Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 For anyone that has had problems with grabbing the linuxserver.io docker templates today the issue has now been fixed. The cause was an overenthusiastic bit of "tidying up" by one of the members who will remain nameless but will be punished accordingly and he is deeply sorry for any inconvenience caused. Quote Link to comment
ijuarez Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 For anyone that has had problems with grabbing the linuxserver.io docker templates today the issue has now been fixed. The cause was an overenthusiastic bit of "tidying up" by one of the members who will remain nameless but will be punished accordingly and he is deeply sorry for any inconvenience caused. Break out the wet noodles and began the beating. Quote Link to comment
JonathanM Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 For anyone that has had problems with grabbing the linuxserver.io docker templates today the issue has now been fixed. The cause was an overenthusiastic bit of "tidying up" by one of the members who will remain nameless but will be punished accordingly and he is deeply sorry for any inconvenience caused. Quote Link to comment
smdion Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 For anyone that has had problems with grabbing the linuxserver.io docker templates today the issue has now been fixed. The cause was an overenthusiastic bit of "tidying up" by one of the members who will remain nameless but will be punished accordingly and he is deeply sorry for any inconvenience caused. I bow to your greatness CHBMB Quote Link to comment
Squid Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 For anyone that has had problems with grabbing the linuxserver.io docker templates today the issue has now been fixed. The cause was an overenthusiastic bit of "tidying up" by one of the members who will remain nameless but will be punished accordingly and he is deeply sorry for any inconvenience caused. I bow to your greatness CHBMB Now, now that's the media god you're talking to. Show the appropriate reverence and kneel at his shrine But I feel for him http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=48733.0 Quote Link to comment
CHBMB Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 Look I'm perfectly happy to have people rib me about this but do you all really find it necessary to quote my post!? It's like rubbing my nose in it... And yes, I was proclaimed a media god and had a shrine made and everything.... Quote Link to comment
Squid Posted June 30, 2016 Share Posted June 30, 2016 Look I'm perfectly happy to have people rib me about this but do you all really find it necessary to quote my post!? It's like rubbing my nose in it... And yes, I was proclaimed a media god and had a shrine made and everything.... Rub your nose in it? Nah, we're more mature than that... ok... maybe I'm not more mature than that, but I'm positive sure reasonably confident will assume there has to be at least one person who isn't laughing Quote Link to comment
SkyHead Posted July 2, 2016 Share Posted July 2, 2016 What url do I add to Template repositories? Quote Link to comment
CHBMB Posted July 2, 2016 Share Posted July 2, 2016 What url do I add to Template repositories? Don't bother adding repositories. We don't publish them because they're not needed on Unraid. Install the community applications plugin. Quote Link to comment
saarg Posted July 2, 2016 Share Posted July 2, 2016 Look I'm perfectly happy to have people rib me about this but do you all really find it necessary to quote my post!? It's like rubbing my nose in it... And yes, I was proclaimed a media god and had a shrine made and everything.... Rub your nose in it? Nah, we're more mature than that... ok... maybe I'm not more mature than that, but I'm positive sure reasonably confident will assume there has to be at least one person who isn't laughing These guys maybe? Quote Link to comment
JugniJi Posted July 29, 2016 Share Posted July 29, 2016 Hi guys, Sorry to interrupt the beer but did anyone manage to get further with unison docker before I take a stab at it ? Cheers Quote Link to comment
linuxserver.io Posted August 2, 2016 Author Share Posted August 2, 2016 Over the past couple of months, there have been a few things going on in the Linuxserver.io world which has led to a slower pace of development and a little less community interaction, and for that we can only apologise. Now we are starting to get back in full swing, we thought we should share what we’ve got planned in the next few weeks & months. REPOSITORIES First of all, there will be some restructuring with our fleet of dockers. Some of our dockers are becoming increasingly difficult to support, so we have decided to re-organise the repo’s. linuxserver Our current main docker repository which will have the fleet of dockers that the team actively supports. linuxserver-community This will be a new, innovative repo, that is for any docker requests from community members that we produce and are not used by any of the linuxserver.io team and will therefore be directly supported by community members themselves. All of the linuxserver.io members are volunteers and do this in our spare time, which is finite. The idea behind this is that if you request a docker and we produce it, then YOU become responsible for helping support it, as you are better placed to do so as an active user. You will become the community liason and named as such. We’d like to see you help other members with any problems and liase with us about any problems you can’t fix or need help with via the forum, github or IRC and work with us to keep this maintained. No coding ability is required, just a willingness to “muck in” and monitor the support thread for the container. If you don’t do so, and “request and run” AND nobody else offers to take over, then eventually we’ll pull the container as it’s not fair to other users if we can’t offer support. lsioarmhf Our second new repo, this time it will be for all you users that want to run our dockers on any armhf platform capable of running the docker service, such as your raspberry pi’s / Odroid boxes. These dockers will be duplicates of the images we create for x86 and will also be both linuxserver and linuxserver-community varieties, lsiodev Our development repo and not for production use. Note, up to now, some of our “non-standard” containers have been in this repo but these will be merged into our main repo going forward and this repo will purely be for development and pre-release testing, therefore unsupported and not recommended for end users. lsiobase Our repo to house all our base images. Over the next couple of weeks, you will therefore find that some Docker containers will be moved to different repo’s or possibly even removed, we don’t yet have a final list of what is being moved/removed yet but if you have any concerns, feel free to get in touch on Github or IRC. BASEIMAGE UPDATES Over the next couple of weeks, we will be switching our containers to a shiny new base image – Alpine. Anything that doesn’t run on Alpine will be rebased to Xenial as we have decided to drop Phusion due to lack of updates and Alpine offers significant advantages in terms of reducing container sizes. We don’t anticipate any major migration issues with the transition from Phusion to Alpine but please please please backup your appdata first before you update our containers. AUTO-UPDATING After much discussion, we have decided that we are going to change our containers regarding the autoupdate feature. Autoupdates have probably been the biggest generator of support issues with our images and as such , in conjunction with the baseimage updates, we are moving towards having the majority of our images not autoupdate, a notable exception being plex media server. Aside from configuration mismatches from version to version and stability issues, the update routines are processor intensive and make containers slow to start. To mitigate this we plan to update the applications more frequently in the future with more regular image refreshes. WEBSITE/FORUM We are planning on doing some maintenance work in regards to the website and forum, a bit of a clean up and try to get some fresh content back into the site. PODCAST Currently the podcast has been put on hold, we have had amazing feedback for this and plan to start this up again soon! COMMUNITY As always we’re a team of volunteers, we rely both on donations and contributions from our own pockets to keep this project going. So as always if you think you can help in any way then please get in touch. Either by helping with support, development, articles for the website or donations. LinuxServer.io Team. Quote Link to comment
JugniJi Posted August 2, 2016 Share Posted August 2, 2016 Hi, During my recent travels I've seen the new structure and overall it's good but I must ask if you'll be open sourcing the root base images, I ask due to security concerns and by the same measure will you be patching all images if following this inheritance model as proposed. Cheers Quote Link to comment
CHBMB Posted August 2, 2016 Share Posted August 2, 2016 Hi, During my recent travels I've seen the new structure and overall it's good but I must ask if you'll be open sourcing the root base images, I ask due to security concerns and by the same measure will you be patching all images if following this inheritance model as proposed. Cheers What do you mean? Everything we do is opensource.... Here's the alpine base image in our github repo. Here's the xenial base image in our github repo. They're all in there.... As regards patching. If a modification to the baseimage is applied then yeah, as before the derived containers also get rebuilt. Quote Link to comment
JugniJi Posted August 2, 2016 Share Posted August 2, 2016 Hi, During my recent travels I've seen the new structure and overall it's good but I must ask if you'll be open sourcing the root base images, I ask due to security concerns and by the same measure will you be patching all images if following this inheritance model as proposed. Cheers What do you mean? Everything we do is opensource.... I find images like this https://hub.docker.com/r/linuxserver/baseimage/ Excuse my ignorance but where can I find the source ? Quote Link to comment
CHBMB Posted August 2, 2016 Share Posted August 2, 2016 Hi, During my recent travels I've seen the new structure and overall it's good but I must ask if you'll be open sourcing the root base images, I ask due to security concerns and by the same measure will you be patching all images if following this inheritance model as proposed. Cheers What do you mean? Everything we do is opensource.... I find images like this https://hub.docker.com/r/linuxserver/baseimage/ Excuse my ignorance but where can I find the source ? Out github repo same as all the other docker authors on here, the one we link to in every support thread. Quote Link to comment
smdion Posted August 2, 2016 Share Posted August 2, 2016 Hi, During my recent travels I've seen the new structure and overall it's good but I must ask if you'll be open sourcing the root base images, I ask due to security concerns and by the same measure will you be patching all images if following this inheritance model as proposed. Cheers I find images like this https://hub.docker.com/r/linuxserver/baseimage/ Excuse my ignorance but where can I find the source ? All of them can be found here https://github.com/linuxserver That specific base image is here - https://github.com/linuxserver/docker-baseimage What do you mean? Everything we do is opensource.... Quote Link to comment
JugniJi Posted August 2, 2016 Share Posted August 2, 2016 What do you mean? Everything we do is opensource.... Here's the alpine base image in our github repo. Here's the xenial base image in our github repo. They're all in there.... As regards patching. If a modification to the baseimage is applied then yeah, as before the derived containers also get rebuilt. Great, thanks exactly what I needed to see. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.