[Support] Linuxserver.io - Unifi


Recommended Posts

use /mnt/cache/appdata instead of /mnt/user/appdata

 

Any specific reasons why this Docker images needs /mnt/cache/appdata instead of /mnt/user/appdata? A lot of other Docker images I use (even from LSIO) works well with /mnt/user/appdata.

 

/mnt/disk1/appdata/unifi/

 

was

/mnt/user/appdata/unifi/

 

OK, should have been fixed in V6.2.4 of unraid.  As an aside, you'll get much better performance from your docker containers if you can put the appdata on a cache disk.

 

I don't see any mention of any fix in unRAID 6.2.4 for the above issue. Could you please explain?

 

Not really sure, but it was a problem with older versions of Unraid that didn't work with the FUSE fs.  Newer versions of Unraid should work, but why don't you try it and let us know?  Instead of using /mnt/user/ specify the DISK that the appdata is on, generally /mnt/cache/

Link to comment

use /mnt/cache/appdata instead of /mnt/user/appdata

 

Any specific reasons why this Docker images needs /mnt/cache/appdata instead of /mnt/user/appdata? A lot of other Docker images I use (even from LSIO) works well with /mnt/user/appdata.

 

/mnt/disk1/appdata/unifi/

 

was

/mnt/user/appdata/unifi/

 

OK, should have been fixed in V6.2.4 of unraid.  As an aside, you'll get much better performance from your docker containers if you can put the appdata on a cache disk.

 

I don't see any mention of any fix in unRAID 6.2.4 for the above issue. Could you please explain?

 

Not really sure, but it was a problem with older versions of Unraid that didn't work with the FUSE fs.  Newer versions of Unraid should work, but why don't you try it and let us know?  Instead of using /mnt/user/ specify the DISK that the appdata is on, generally /mnt/cache/

Confirmed that in order to get this to work I have to reference the disk rather /mnt/user, and I am using unRaid 6.2.4

Was there anything specific within the container's logs?  Tom can't fix what he can't replicate...
Link to comment

@Squid, negative, it looked like the docker was running fat dumb and happy.  Since getting it up and working and finally getting my AP adopted.  I do get this within the log:

 

-------------------------------------
_ _ _
| |___| (_) ___
| / __| | |/ _ \
| \__ \ | | (_) |
|_|___/ |_|\___/
|_|

Brought to you by linuxserver.io
We gratefully accept donations at:
https://www.linuxserver.io/index.php/donations/
-------------------------------------
GID/UID
-------------------------------------
User uid: 99
User gid: 100
-------------------------------------

[cont-init.d] 10-adduser: exited 0.
[cont-init.d] 20-config: executing...
[cont-init.d] 20-config: exited 0.
[cont-init.d] 30-keygen: executing...
[cont-init.d] 30-keygen: exited 0.
[cont-init.d] done.
[services.d] starting services
[services.d] done.
[b]OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM warning: You have loaded library /usr/lib/unifi/lib/native/Linux/amd64/libubnt_webrtc_jni.so which might have disabled stack guard. The VM will try to fix the stack guard now.

It's highly recommended that you fix the library with 'execstack -c <libfile>', or link it with '-z noexecstack'.[/b]

Link to comment

@Squid, negative, it looked like the docker was running fat dumb and happy.

  That's a shame.  AFAIK everything *should* be working when using /mnt/user/appdata, and Tom can't fix if we can't tell him why it doesn't

 

I do get this within the log:
I'm quite positive that CHBMB will know the answer to that  ;D
Link to comment

just loaded Unifi Controller as a docker on Unraid 6.2.4

 

ive not added a AP yet bt just looked a t the log for it in Docker section and it says:

 

OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM warning: You have loaded library /usr/lib/unifi/lib/native/Linux/amd64/libubnt_webrtc_jni.so which might have disabled stack guard. The VM will try to fix the stack guard now.

It's highly recommended that you fix the library with 'execstack -c <libfile>', or link it with '-z noexecstack'.

 

any idea what i need to do here?

Link to comment

Not really sure, but it was a problem with older versions of Unraid that didn't work with the FUSE fs.  Newer versions of Unraid should work, but why don't you try it and let us know?  Instead of using /mnt/user/ specify the DISK that the appdata is on, generally /mnt/cache/

 

Yep, it does work with the disk being referenced instead of the user share. However, I was wondering what prevents the user share from working when either of them should suffice.

Link to comment

Hey, can you guys perhaps confirm what version of the UniFi Controller you are running? I'm still seeing 5.2.7 on mine and wonder if I need to do anything special to get it up to the 5.4.x releases that are currently out.

 

Edit: Or maybe the repository is only presenting 5.2.7 as the latest stable release? I'll have to check into this a bit more, but maybe someone can kindly point me in the right direction too.

 

Edit 2: Okay, 5.4.9 was found via the unifi5 Debian repo, so I'm not sure what's up.

Link to comment

Hey, can you guys perhaps confirm what version of the UniFi Controller you are running? I'm still seeing 5.2.7 on mine and wonder if I need to do anything special to get it up to the 5.4.x releases that are currently out.

 

Edit: Or maybe the repository is only presenting 5.2.7 as the latest stable release? I'll have to check into this a bit more, but maybe someone can kindly point me in the right direction too.

 

The latest build on friday was with 5.4.9. Have you pushed the check for updates button on the docker page?

Link to comment

Forgive me, as I'm now going to show that I'm a terrible imposter now. I don't run unRAID and just a regular Docker image. The ls.io forums don't have any forum posts of note for this so I'm checking out a much more active community on this.

 

So, I don't really have a check for updates feature, no. I can restart the docker container but otherwise it doesn't seem to pull in new software, or at least yet.

Link to comment

Forgive me, as I'm now going to show that I'm a terrible imposter now. I don't run unRAID and just a regular Docker image. The ls.io forums don't have any forum posts of note for this so I'm checking out a much more active community on this.

 

So, I don't really have a check for updates feature, no. I can restart the docker container but otherwise it doesn't seem to pull in new software, or at least yet.

 

Then you should be using IRC for support or our forums.  Not fair to LT to be using their forums.  Remove the container & image and repull it.

Link to comment

Was the update pushed already?  I'm still showing no new updates and i'm on 5.3.10 controller.

 

Is there a way I can manually update the docker on my side as I can download the updates via Ubnt?

 

image will be updated on friday as part of our regular weekly image refresh schedule.

 

Thanks. Update came through and working fine.

Link to comment
  • trurl locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.