January 1, 201610 yr Author Started 3 build operations for disks 1, 2 and 3 (see first picture) After a few minutes canceled disk 3, both disk 1 and 2 continue to work (see second picture) You might want to clear your browser cookies, and start fresh, perhaps that helps? Also try the latest version of today. Several corrections have been made in the past days.
January 1, 201610 yr Can o please repeat your test but canceling disk1 instead of 3? I'm not close to a server right now but I believe it didn't happened if I canceled the last disk.
January 1, 201610 yr Author Can o please repeat your test but canceling disk1 instead of 3? I'm not close to a server right now but I believe it didn't happened if I canceled the last disk. Good catch, canceling the first disk 1 gives your situation. Let me check and correct that ...
January 1, 201610 yr Author Made a correction and fixed the incorrect display update when a running disk operation is canceled. There is a mistake corrected too in the process termination logic (it didn't always find the corresponding pid). Please update to version 2016.01.01b if you want to use the Cancel functionality on the control page.
January 2, 201610 yr I am getting the following from my unRAID terminal on upon reboot: unRAID login: /etc/inotifywait.conf: line 3: /mnt/disk2: Is a directory I am guessing it has to do with this plugin?
January 2, 201610 yr Author I am getting the following from my unRAID terminal on upon reboot: unRAID login: /etc/inotifywait.conf: line 3: /mnt/disk2: Is a directory I am guessing it has to do with this plugin? Yes, but wondering why the message appears. Can't find a clear reason. Can you show the content of this file on your system (below is mine): # cat /etc/inotifywait.conf cmd="a" method="-b2" exclude="" disks="/mnt/disk1 /mnt/disk2 /mnt/disk3 /mnt/disk4 /mnt/disk5 /mnt/disk6 /mnt/disk7 /mnt/disk8 /mnt/disk9 /mnt/disk10 /mnt/disk11"
January 2, 201610 yr # cat /etc/inotifywait.conf method=-b2 exclude= disks=/mnt/disk1 /mnt/disk2 I also got an email from my server. Same message but a little more info: Subject: cron for user root /usr/bin/run-parts /etc/cron.daily 1> /dev/null Body: /etc/inotifywait.conf: line 3: /mnt/disk2: Is a directory
January 2, 201610 yr Author # cat /etc/inotifywait.conf method=-b2 exclude= disks=/mnt/disk1 /mnt/disk2 I also got an email from my server. Same message but a little more info: Subject: cron for user root /usr/bin/run-parts /etc/cron.daily 1> /dev/null Body: /etc/inotifywait.conf: line 3: /mnt/disk2: Is a directory In the latest version I have quoted the values of the conf file, e.g. disks="/mnt/disk1 /mnt/disk2". This is needed when spaces are present. You may want to upgrade. As an extra measure I suppress error readings. Thanks for testing.
January 2, 201610 yr In the latest version I have quoted the values of the conf file, e.g. disks="/mnt/disk1 /mnt/disk2". This is needed when spaces are present. You may want to upgrade. As an extra measure I suppress error readings. Thanks for testing. Thanks, I was 1 version off Latest version added the "".
January 2, 201610 yr I'm trying to upgrade from 2016.0.01a to 2016.01.02 but receive the following error: plugin: bad file MD5: /boot/config/plugins/dynamix.file.integrity/dynamix.file.integrity.txz
January 3, 201610 yr There appears to be something wrong in latest version, build works ok but trying to run a check completes without any file being verified, syslog fills with file not found errors, file names on log are incomplete, probably the cause of the problem.
January 3, 201610 yr Author There appears to be something wrong in latest version, build works ok but trying to run a check completes without any file being verified, syslog fills with file not found errors, file names on log are incomplete, probably the cause of the problem. You may want to use the "really" latest version which is 2016.01.03. Can you check the format of your export files, is it still in the old format with 5 fields separated by a | character, or is it the new format which is 2 fields separated by a * character. All commands now expect the new format and are not able to read the old format. Thanks for testing.
January 3, 201610 yr Author I'm trying to upgrade from 2016.0.01a to 2016.01.02 but receive the following error: plugin: bad file MD5: /boot/config/plugins/dynamix.file.integrity/dynamix.file.integrity.txz This may be a bad download. There is a newer version available now. Do a "Check for updates" and do an installation. Should go all fine. Thanks for testing.
January 3, 201610 yr Updated but still not working, I’m only using new format only, from a quick test: Exported file: fe893c472a452790f85f7bb720fea856 */mnt/disk4/test/james.corden.2015.11.12.saoirse.ronan.hdtv.x264-crooks.mp4 b2acaee8d6152c5fbaf27ad1abca9074 */mnt/disk4/test/james.corden.2015.11.16.natalie.dormer.hdtv.x264-crooks.mp4 61b6e399a721af7aa6ee53e55e5e05b8 */mnt/disk4/test/james.corden.2015.11.17.ethan.hawke.hdtv.x264-crooks.mp4 4e66607e129855e777f68c7c40e128cd */mnt/disk4/test/james.corden.2015.11.18.anthony.mackie.hdtv.x264-crooks.mp4 52b644ea8298b38b2891c7d89339db90 */mnt/disk4/test/james.corden.2015.11.19.bryan.cranston.hdtv.x264-crooks.mp4 From syslog after pressing check: Jan 3 10:22:53 Testv6 bunker: warning: 5.11.12.saoirse.ronan.hdtv.x264-crooks.mp4 is missing Jan 3 10:22:53 Testv6 bunker: warning: 5.11.16.natalie.dormer.hdtv.x264-crooks.mp4 is missing Jan 3 10:22:53 Testv6 bunker: warning: 5.11.17.ethan.hawke.hdtv.x264-crooks.mp4 is missing Jan 3 10:22:53 Testv6 bunker: warning: 5.11.18.anthony.mackie.hdtv.x264-crooks.mp4 is missing Jan 3 10:22:53 Testv6 bunker: warning: 5.11.19.bryan.cranston.hdtv.x264-crooks.mp4 is missing
January 3, 201610 yr Author Can you give me a step by step overview how to produce? I just started a 'check' here and works as expected.
January 3, 201610 yr Select a disk and press build, wait for build to finish. Select same disk and press check. I even tried with simpler file names just in case and got same result: disk4.export.hash fe893c472a452790f85f7bb720fea856 */mnt/disk4/test/1.mp4 b2acaee8d6152c5fbaf27ad1abca9074 */mnt/disk4/test/2.mp4 61b6e399a721af7aa6ee53e55e5e05b8 */mnt/disk4/test/3.mp4 4e66607e129855e777f68c7c40e128cd */mnt/disk4/test/4.mp4 52b644ea8298b38b2891c7d89339db90 */mnt/disk4/test/5.mp4 syslog Jan 3 10:39:43 Testv6 bunker: added 5 files from /mnt/disk4 with mask *. Duration: 00:00:06 Average speed: 329. MB/s Jan 3 10:39:49 Testv6 bunker: warning: is missing Jan 3 10:39:49 Testv6 bunker: warning: is missing Jan 3 10:39:49 Testv6 bunker: warning: is missing Jan 3 10:39:49 Testv6 bunker: warning: is missing Jan 3 10:39:49 Testv6 bunker: warning: is missing
January 3, 201610 yr Author Can you try: build - export -check Build means the extended attributes are created. Export means extended atrributes are exported to a file Check means export file is used to check against calculated hash of file(s) Also: after upgrading to the latest version, you need to stop/start the protect function on the settings page, in order to make the update work.
January 3, 201610 yr OK, believe I found something, check works on hashs done with BLAKE2, fails on hashs done with MD5 or SHA256.
January 3, 201610 yr Author OK, believe I found something, check works on hashs done with BLAKE2, fails on hashs done with MD5 or SHA256. Ok, need to investigate that (I am using BLAKE2 all the time). Thanks for testing and helping out.
January 3, 201610 yr Author Well a 'stupid' mistake from my side. The key lengths of MD5 and SHA256 were mixed up. Causing both methods to use the wrong key size when performing their operations. I've made a correction for this, plus some more updates. See the release notes of version 2013.01.03a Please update to this version.
January 3, 201610 yr That was it, thanks. One little suggestion if you don’t mind, at the moment when the check is finish it only displays “Check finished”, I’d like to request more info, for example you could take the info displayed during a check and modify it a litle to display at the end: Check finished, processed xxx of xxx files. Skipped: 0 files. Found: 0 mismatches, 0 corruptions I believe you’re taking a simpler approach and just notifying in case of errors but I would feel better having more info of what was actually checked in the end.
January 3, 201610 yr Author One little suggestion if you don’t mind, at the moment when the check is finish it only displays “Check finished”, I’d like to request more info, for example you could take the info displayed during a check and modify it a litle to display at the end: Sure, that is possible and available. Please update to version 2016.01.04. Below a screenshot of what it looks like.
January 4, 201610 yr Really excited for this - initial check nearly done on my i5 server (3 4Tb data disks). Is it normal for a lower specd server to become fully unresponsive during the initial check (specs in signature)
January 4, 201610 yr Author Really excited for this - initial check nearly done on my i5 server (3 4Tb data disks). Is it normal for a lower specd server to become fully unresponsive during the initial check (specs in signature) If you started all three disks simultaneously, it can introduce a full load on your processor. Alternatively you can build one disk at the time to lower the load, but it will take longer to complete all disks.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.