Furby8704 Posted February 19, 2016 Share Posted February 19, 2016 i just shrinked my array and had to disable each disk share one by one if global seetings are set to no or auto it disables the cache drive as well just curious if there is a way disk shares can be disabled without disabling cache drive?? Quote Link to comment
trurl Posted February 20, 2016 Share Posted February 20, 2016 No. And cache is like any other drive as far as the warning to not mix disks and user shares when moving or copying. Why do you want to share cache? Quote Link to comment
Furby8704 Posted February 21, 2016 Author Share Posted February 21, 2016 No. And cache is like any other drive as far as the warning to not mix disks and user shares when moving or copying. Why do you want to share cache? i interact with cache disk more for recently added content instead of loading my full entire share. i know not to mix disk & user shares. makes it easy to rename, move, and add content from downloads folder only on cache drive Quote Link to comment
JonathanM Posted February 21, 2016 Share Posted February 21, 2016 i interact with cache disk more for recently added content instead of loading my full entire share. i know not to mix disk & user shares. makes it easy to rename, move, and add content from downloads folder only on cache drive So why not interact with the cache only share? Quote Link to comment
Furby8704 Posted February 22, 2016 Author Share Posted February 22, 2016 So why not interact with the cache only share? because i have to mount cache share and then the user shares where files will go to if i mount the cache disk share i only mount once and do everything in that disk share Quote Link to comment
trurl Posted February 22, 2016 Share Posted February 22, 2016 So why not interact with the cache only share? because i have to mount cache share and then the user shares where files will go to if i mount the cache disk share i only mount once and do everything in that disk share I'm a little unclear about your use of the word "mount" here. Do you actually mean "mapping a network drive" or are you working with this from another Linux machine? And this talk about having the cache share and the user share where the files will go makes me worry about what I said earlier. You should not move or copy from the cache share (which is a disk share) to a user share. Quote Link to comment
Furby8704 Posted February 22, 2016 Author Share Posted February 22, 2016 I'm a little unclear about your use of the word "mount" here. Do you actually mean "mapping a network drive" or are you working with this from another Linux machine? And this talk about having the cache share and the user share where the files will go makes me worry about what I said earlier. You should not move or copy from the cache share (which is a disk share) to a user share. mac user but yes pretty much when i map a network drive/mount. ive been doing it for years and hasnt been a problem Example: this is my cache share disk with cache only shares Cache Disk Share --/appdata --/appdata/docker.img --/appdata/config --/appdata/config/apps --/downloads --/downloads/complete --/downloads/incomplete --/vm --/vm/iso --/vm/vdisks/ if i want to something moved to a user share i just move it to the root of the cache disk share mover script will take care of moving it to the appropriate user share ***so previous cache shares from above*** --/media/tv shows --/meda/movies --/media/anime --/media/music --/work --/work/2015 --/work/2016 --/work/files so i find it easier to work within the cache disk share mount/mapped because i can do everything there instead of mount/mapping 2 user shares /downloads & /media Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.