February 19, 201610 yr i just shrinked my array and had to disable each disk share one by one if global seetings are set to no or auto it disables the cache drive as well just curious if there is a way disk shares can be disabled without disabling cache drive??
February 20, 201610 yr Community Expert No. And cache is like any other drive as far as the warning to not mix disks and user shares when moving or copying. Why do you want to share cache?
February 21, 201610 yr Author No. And cache is like any other drive as far as the warning to not mix disks and user shares when moving or copying. Why do you want to share cache? i interact with cache disk more for recently added content instead of loading my full entire share. i know not to mix disk & user shares. makes it easy to rename, move, and add content from downloads folder only on cache drive
February 21, 201610 yr i interact with cache disk more for recently added content instead of loading my full entire share. i know not to mix disk & user shares. makes it easy to rename, move, and add content from downloads folder only on cache drive So why not interact with the cache only share?
February 22, 201610 yr Author So why not interact with the cache only share? because i have to mount cache share and then the user shares where files will go to if i mount the cache disk share i only mount once and do everything in that disk share
February 22, 201610 yr Community Expert So why not interact with the cache only share? because i have to mount cache share and then the user shares where files will go to if i mount the cache disk share i only mount once and do everything in that disk share I'm a little unclear about your use of the word "mount" here. Do you actually mean "mapping a network drive" or are you working with this from another Linux machine? And this talk about having the cache share and the user share where the files will go makes me worry about what I said earlier. You should not move or copy from the cache share (which is a disk share) to a user share.
February 22, 201610 yr Author I'm a little unclear about your use of the word "mount" here. Do you actually mean "mapping a network drive" or are you working with this from another Linux machine? And this talk about having the cache share and the user share where the files will go makes me worry about what I said earlier. You should not move or copy from the cache share (which is a disk share) to a user share. mac user but yes pretty much when i map a network drive/mount. ive been doing it for years and hasnt been a problem Example: this is my cache share disk with cache only shares Cache Disk Share --/appdata --/appdata/docker.img --/appdata/config --/appdata/config/apps --/downloads --/downloads/complete --/downloads/incomplete --/vm --/vm/iso --/vm/vdisks/ if i want to something moved to a user share i just move it to the root of the cache disk share mover script will take care of moving it to the appropriate user share ***so previous cache shares from above*** --/media/tv shows --/meda/movies --/media/anime --/media/music --/work --/work/2015 --/work/2016 --/work/files so i find it easier to work within the cache disk share mount/mapped because i can do everything there instead of mount/mapping 2 user shares /downloads & /media
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.