April 29, 201610 yr HI guys, I got in trouble trying Link aggregation Hardware: Netgear GS108T Supermicro X9SCM onboard dual nic's Settings: LAG.jpg unraid.jpg under no circumstances I am able to pull more then one Gb/s with multiple Lan clients on the same switch bond0: flags=5443<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,MASTER,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 ether 00:25:90:a2:d0:09 txqueuelen 0 (Ethernet) RX packets 6279758 bytes 3490983229 (3.2 GiB) RX errors 0 dropped 174 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 55033855 bytes 82229057528 (76.5 GiB) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 br0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet 192.168.178.100 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.178.255 ether 00:25:90:a2:d0:09 txqueuelen 0 (Ethernet) RX packets 4950798 bytes 3306330164 (3.0 GiB) RX errors 0 dropped 683 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 2634831 bytes 78639099416 (73.2 GiB) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 docker0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet 172.17.42.1 netmask 255.255.0.0 broadcast 0.0.0.0 ether 4a:41:c3:c7:f1:30 txqueuelen 0 (Ethernet) RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 262 bytes 42972 (41.9 KiB) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 eth0: flags=6211<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SLAVE,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 ether 00:25:90:a2:d0:09 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) RX packets 8290824 bytes 3637029485 (3.3 GiB) RX errors 0 dropped 5 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 91528822 bytes 137578166585 (128.1 GiB) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 device interrupt 20 memory 0xdfc00000-dfc20000 eth1: flags=6211<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SLAVE,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 ether 00:25:90:a2:d0:09 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) RX packets 432354 bytes 31448921 (29.9 MiB) RX errors 0 dropped 10 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 2756 bytes 241153 (235.5 KiB) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 device interrupt 16 memory 0xdf900000-df920000 lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 65536 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0 loop txqueuelen 0 (Local Loopback) RX packets 6927 bytes 741703 (724.3 KiB) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 6927 bytes 741703 (724.3 KiB) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 virbr0: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet 192.168.122.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.122.255 ether 52:54:00:c3:95:f8 txqueuelen 0 (Ethernet) RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 eth0 is doing all the work eth1 does almost nothing bond0 and br0 show the right amount of traffic but do not peak over 1 Gb/s
April 29, 201610 yr Are you sure that your moving enough data when you test the LACP? Say copying large 1-2G files to an SSD cache from 2+ clients at the same time.
April 29, 201610 yr Author Are you sure that your moving enough data when you test the LACP? Say copying large 1-2G files to an SSD cache from 2+ clients at the same time. absolutely, I am accesing multiple disks from multiple clients, sadly no ssd but it caps at around 980 Mbit/s edit: balance-rr works like a charm btw.. tested it with only two clients: 1,5 Gbit/s peak
April 30, 201610 yr Author DONE bringing the interfaces down and up again via ifconfig does the trick thread can be closed, thanks fo your help roberth58 ! best regards Christoph
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.