SCSI Posted July 20, 2016 Share Posted July 20, 2016 Hi, just checking to see if the recent betas and RC versions have 'fixed' the issue where unraid does not appear in windows 10 network? I hoped it would, with various samba updates, but on RC2 now and still no luck. Yes I can browse by pasting in IP address directly, have checked to make sure unraid the local master etc. will be interested to hear if anyone else still has this issue thanks, I never encountered this issue and I am using RC2 with the latest Windows 10 Insider. Link to comment
BobPhoenix Posted July 20, 2016 Share Posted July 20, 2016 Hi, just checking to see if the recent betas and RC versions have 'fixed' the issue where unraid does not appear in windows 10 network? I hoped it would, with various samba updates, but on RC2 now and still no luck. Yes I can browse by pasting in IP address directly, have checked to make sure unraid the local master etc. will be interested to hear if anyone else still has this issue thanks, You could fix it by turning off SMB3 features either on unRAID or on your Win 10 box. Link to comment
Frank1940 Posted July 20, 2016 Share Posted July 20, 2016 Hi, just checking to see if the recent betas and RC versions have 'fixed' the issue where unraid does not appear in windows 10 network? First, what version of Windows 10 are you using? Second thing you can try is to put the attached file into the config folder on your flash drive. You will have to stop-and-start the array to actually load it into the SMB configuration. (Brief note of explanation: MS has raised the default of the os level variable with each version of Windows to help assure that the current version of Windows will 'win' the election of the local master. By setting it to 255, we can assure that no version of Windows will ever stand a chance of winning on that basis.) One more thing to check is that you have consistently formatted the workgroup name on all of your computers. (Windows doesn't care about capitalization but Linux does! For example, 'Group' and 'group' are not the same workgroup to Linux! ) EDIT: One other point, it can take up to a half hour to get all of the computers on an SMB network synchronized. Having your unRAID server as the Local Master works best when it on 24-7. smb-extra.conf Link to comment
garycase Posted July 20, 2016 Share Posted July 20, 2016 ... You could fix it by turning off SMB3 features either on unRAID or on your Win 10 box. How do you do this? I've had the same issue since installing v6.2 => works perfectly, but doesn't show up on my network scan, so I have to type the address in Explorer. Link to comment
CHBMB Posted July 20, 2016 Share Posted July 20, 2016 ... You could fix it by turning off SMB3 features either on unRAID or on your Win 10 box. How do you do this? I've had the same issue since installing v6.2 => works perfectly, but doesn't show up on my network scan, so I have to type the address in Explorer. Wow Gary.... I thought you knew everything.... Can't recall you needing to ask a question before... Link to comment
garycase Posted July 20, 2016 Share Posted July 20, 2016 ... You could fix it by turning off SMB3 features either on unRAID or on your Win 10 box. How do you do this? I've had the same issue since installing v6.2 => works perfectly, but doesn't show up on my network scan, so I have to type the address in Explorer. Wow Gary.... I thought you knew everything.... Can't recall you needing to ask a question before... :) So what's the answer ?? I don't see any setting to change the SMB version in UnRAID. Link to comment
nexusmaniac Posted July 20, 2016 Share Posted July 20, 2016 ... You could fix it by turning off SMB3 features either on unRAID or on your Win 10 box. How do you do this? I've had the same issue since installing v6.2 => works perfectly, but doesn't show up on my network scan, so I have to type the address in Explorer. Wow Gary.... I thought you knew everything.... Can't recall you needing to ask a question before... :) So what's the answer ?? I don't see any setting to change the SMB version in UnRAID. No idea how to do that in unRAID But in powershell, type this: Set-SmbServerConfiguration -EnableSMB2Protocol $false edit: this thread's worth a look https://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=37835.0 Link to comment
saarg Posted July 20, 2016 Share Posted July 20, 2016 ... You could fix it by turning off SMB3 features either on unRAID or on your Win 10 box. How do you do this? I've had the same issue since installing v6.2 => works perfectly, but doesn't show up on my network scan, so I have to type the address in Explorer. Wow Gary.... I thought you knew everything.... Can't recall you needing to ask a question before... :) So what's the answer ?? I don't see any setting to change the SMB version in UnRAID. I'm shocked If I remember correctly you can add the below line in /boot/config/smb-extra.conf. max protocol = SMB2_02 Link to comment
garycase Posted July 20, 2016 Share Posted July 20, 2016 ... You could fix it by turning off SMB3 features either on unRAID or on your Win 10 box. How do you do this? I've had the same issue since installing v6.2 => works perfectly, but doesn't show up on my network scan, so I have to type the address in Explorer. Wow Gary.... I thought you knew everything.... Can't recall you needing to ask a question before... :) So what's the answer ?? I don't see any setting to change the SMB version in UnRAID. I'm shocked If I remember correctly you can add the below line in /boot/config/smb-extra.conf. max protocol = SMB2_02 Can that line simply be added on the Settings page - SMB - "SMB Extra Configuration" section ? Link to comment
garycase Posted July 20, 2016 Share Posted July 20, 2016 Never mind -- I simply added it and tried it ... and it works fine Link to comment
saarg Posted July 20, 2016 Share Posted July 20, 2016 Never mind -- I simply added it and tried it ... and it works fine I wasn't sure if that was only in my head or a reality, so I just mentioned the file Link to comment
BobPhoenix Posted July 20, 2016 Share Posted July 20, 2016 Knew somebody would have the info readily available didn't have time myself to search for it - sorry. Link to comment
garycase Posted July 20, 2016 Share Posted July 20, 2016 Knew somebody would have the info readily available didn't have time myself to search for it - sorry. I'm just glad you mentioned it ... not sure I'd have thought about dropping down a level in SMB. I easily found the registry mod to do it in Windows, but definitely preferred to make the change on the UnRAID box, since it's the only one that has that issue. Link to comment
ajgoyt Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 However ... the only really compelling feature over the final 6.1 release is dual parity => if you're not planning to add a 2nd parity disk, you may indeed want to wait for the final release. And NVMe cache support. Is NVME cache support coming for final? I can hardly wait to switch for the turbo write support, I transfer files from my win10 workstation to Unraid 6.1.9 from my connectx2 cards through my 10gb switch and still drop from 320mb/s to about 50mb/s half way through the transfer on platter drives in the array, Now from SSD on workstation (win10) to SSD cache the transfer is pretty steady at 300+. Link to comment
nexusmaniac Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 However ... the only really compelling feature over the final 6.1 release is dual parity => if you're not planning to add a 2nd parity disk, you may indeed want to wait for the final release. And NVMe cache support. Is NVME cache support coming for final? I can hardly wait to switch for the turbo write support, I transfer files from my win10 workstation to Unraid 6.1.9 from my connectx2 cards through my 10gb switch and still drop from 320mb/s to about 50mb/s half way through the transfer on platter drives in the array, Now from SSD on workstation (win10) to SSD cache the transfer is pretty steady at 300+. It's been in 6.2 since beta18 iirc! Link to comment
steini84 Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 Hello guys Has 9p sharing been removed? Nevermind - the update just corrupted my vm xml - Removed the definition and recreated it with the template. Another thing is that stopped working after update from 6.1.9 - 6.2-rc2 is where you can keep docker.img I use ZFS and keep my docker.img at /SSD/Docker/docker.img but that gives me this error: Unraid root: no image mounted at /var/lib/docker I moved the folder to /mnt/Docker/docker.img and that works so I guess there is somewhere a hardcoded refrence that docker.img should be within /mnt/* Please fix this for the final release Link to comment
JorgeB Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 I can hardly wait to switch for the turbo write support, I transfer files from my win10 workstation to Unraid 6.1.9 from my connectx2 cards through my 10gb switch and still drop from 320mb/s to about 50mb/s half way through the transfer on platter drives in the array, Now from SSD on workstation (win10) to SSD cache the transfer is pretty steady at 300+. You can use turbo write on V6.1, it can be enabled on the console. Link to comment
Dawid Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 Hi There, Seems that I have a problem I'm trying to add a new disk to the array with no luck @ all. I'm stuck @ "Start will bring the array on-line and start Clearing new data disk(s)." I click start and nothing happens. I have tried to format the disk using mkfs.xfs /dev/sdX but still no luck the array will not start with the new drive. Any idea ? I'm on RC2. Kind Regards Dawid Link to comment
mr-hexen Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 Clearing the disk will take many hours depending on drive size. Wait over night. EDIT: Post your syslog, it should say clearing has begun. Link to comment
TheMantis Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 Hi There, Seems that I have a problem I'm trying to add a new disk to the array with no luck @ all. I'm stuck @ "Start will bring the array on-line and start Clearing new data disk(s)." I click start and nothing happens. I have tried to format the disk using mkfs.xfs /dev/sdX but still no luck the array will not start with the new drive. Any idea ? I'm on RC2. Kind Regards Dawid It's a bug. Should be fixed in the next release apparently. Link to comment
bonienl Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 Hi There, Seems that I have a problem I'm trying to add a new disk to the array with no luck @ all. I'm stuck @ "Start will bring the array on-line and start Clearing new data disk(s)." I click start and nothing happens. I have tried to format the disk using mkfs.xfs /dev/sdX but still no luck the array will not start with the new drive. Any idea ? I'm on RC2. Kind Regards Dawid It's a bug. Should be fixed in the next release apparently. HOW TO REPORT A BUG Think you've found a bug or other defect? Ask yourself these questions before posting about it here: [*]Have I successfully tested this bug with all my plugins disabled (booting into safe mode)? [*]Can I recreate the bug consistently and have I documented the steps to do so? [*]Have I downloaded my diagnostics from the unRAID webGui after the bug occurred, but before I rebooted the system? Link to comment
smiro0 Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 Hi There, Seems that I have a problem I'm trying to add a new disk to the array with no luck @ all. I'm stuck @ "Start will bring the array on-line and start Clearing new data disk(s)." I click start and nothing happens. I have tried to format the disk using mkfs.xfs /dev/sdX but still no luck the array will not start with the new drive. Any idea ? I'm on RC2. Kind Regards Dawid I have the exact same problem. After 6 disks, i cannot add other disk. Link to comment
PeterB Posted July 22, 2016 Share Posted July 22, 2016 Hi There, Seems that I have a problem I'm trying to add a new disk to the array with no luck @ all. I'm stuck @ "Start will bring the array on-line and start Clearing new data disk(s)." I click start and nothing happens. I have tried to format the disk using mkfs.xfs /dev/sdX but still no luck the array will not start with the new drive. Any idea ? I'm on RC2. Kind Regards Dawid It's a bug. Should be fixed in the next release apparently. HOW TO REPORT A BUG Think you've found a bug or other defect? Ask yourself these questions before posting about it here: [*]Have I successfully tested this bug with all my plugins disabled (booting into safe mode)? [*]Can I recreate the bug consistently and have I documented the steps to do so? [*]Have I downloaded my diagnostics from the unRAID webGui after the bug occurred, but before I rebooted the system? Is there any point in reporting it when it's already been acknowledged by limetech? Link to comment
knex666 Posted July 22, 2016 Share Posted July 22, 2016 Hey, Nice work! I was absolutly enthusiastic to install the new release. But than I came into trouble and I cant find why. So this will not be a bug but a problem I´ve got and it is not mentioned here. Jul 21 22:27:47 Tower emhttp: shcmd (233): /etc/rc.d/rc.docker start |& logger Jul 21 22:27:48 Tower root: starting docker ... Jul 21 22:27:49 Tower emhttp: shcmd (246): set -o pipefail ; /usr/local/sbin/mount_image '/mnt/cache/docker.img' /var/lib/docker 10 |& logger Jul 21 22:27:49 Tower root: /mnt/cache/docker.img is in-use, cannot mount Jul 21 22:27:49 Tower emhttp: shcmd: shcmd (246): exit status: 1 any idea how to solf this. would be very bad to load all docker containers because I did some changes in some. Thank you!! Link to comment
CHBMB Posted July 22, 2016 Share Posted July 22, 2016 Hey, Nice work! I was absolutly enthusiastic to install the new release. But than I came into trouble and I cant find why. So this will not be a bug but a problem I´ve got and it is not mentioned here. Jul 21 22:27:47 Tower emhttp: shcmd (233): /etc/rc.d/rc.docker start |& logger Jul 21 22:27:48 Tower root: starting docker ... Jul 21 22:27:49 Tower emhttp: shcmd (246): set -o pipefail ; /usr/local/sbin/mount_image '/mnt/cache/docker.img' /var/lib/docker 10 |& logger Jul 21 22:27:49 Tower root: /mnt/cache/docker.img is in-use, cannot mount Jul 21 22:27:49 Tower emhttp: shcmd: shcmd (246): exit status: 1 any idea how to solf this. would be very bad to load all docker containers because I did some changes in some. Thank you!! Read the first post on how to report a bug or read the post above on how to report a bug. Also for any issues we need more that that to help you. If in doubt always post diagnostics. Link to comment
Recommended Posts