July 31, 20178 yr Hiya guys, my problem is with the XFS & ReiserFS. I have 1x2TB ReisterFS media drive and the more important family photos drive which is 4TB and XFS. Brand new build with old drives (currently replacing all). i7 6800k+MSI X99A Mobo+8GB Corsair Vengeance 2400MHz, Passive MSI GeForce 2GB 1030 GPU (in an Antec S10 case - its my new baby) I would be really grateful for any help, like i said there is a really important drive (aren't they all). Family pictures are the most important that i get off the drive. The 2TB Reiser has been reiserfsck --check, reiserfsck --fix-fixable, resierfsck --rebuild-sb, and --rebuild-tree. root@Tower:~# reiserfsck --fix-fixable /dev/sdc1 reiserfsck 3.6.25 Will check consistency of the filesystem on /dev/sdc1 and will fix what can be fixed without --rebuild-tree Will put log info to 'stdout' Do you want to run this program?[N/Yes] (note need to type Yes if you do):Yes ########### reiserfsck --fix-fixable started at Mon Jul 31 15:48:14 2017 ########### Replaying journal: Done. Reiserfs journal '/dev/sdc1' in blocks [18..8211]: 0 transactions replayed Zero bit found in on-disk bitmap after the last valid bit. Fixed. Checking internal tree.. Bad root block 0. (--rebuild-tree did not complete) Aborted That is the most common error now, the bad root block 0 on the reiserfs disk. It has media on it and i really don't want to lose it. Currently showing as unmountable if not in maintenance mode. The XFS 4TB WD Green (main) disk has been disconnected and turned off in the hope that somehow jesus or al gore works some magic while it is off. No such luck. I think it is a bad sector on the XFS but i will need to connect it, run xfs_repair and post the results. Any advise on this would be greatly appreciated. More so would reassurance my almost 20 years of family photos have not been lost. (Yes, i know they should have been backed up before now. Disk1 (XFS) failed, parity was corrupt and disk 3 (reiserfs) failed. Thank you Edited July 31, 20178 yr by numanuma
July 31, 20178 yr Author I've back up my old configs and done Tools>New Config, moved the 5TB parity drive (which is also showing the faulty triangle on the webgui) and formatted it to XFS, then New Config again and moved it back to Parity. I've got the only of my 3 data drives in lot 2, which is also a 2TB drive, doing a parity back up now. 12hr to go, ~100MB/sec I have no idea what to do after that completes, assuming there are no errors
July 31, 20178 yr Community Expert 42 minutes ago, numanuma said: reiserfsck 3.6.25 reiserfs tools 3.6.25 are broke and can't fix most issues, you need to update to latest unRAID.
July 31, 20178 yr Author 11 minutes ago, johnnie.black said: reiserfs tools 3.6.25 are broke and can't fix most issues, you need to update to latest unRAID. I'll grab the latest zip and move the bz files. Any ideas on my XFS issue? Edited July 31, 20178 yr by numanuma
July 31, 20178 yr Community Expert 1 minute ago, numanuma said: Any ideas on my XFS issue? You didn't post enough info, diagnostics and xfs_repair output may help.
July 31, 20178 yr Author 1 hour ago, johnnie.black said: You didn't post enough info, diagnostics and xfs_repair output may help. Ok, i'll work on XFS once this reiserfs is done. Stopped the parity sync because thr data on disk2 can wait until disk3 is done. Updated to latest unraid, --check, --fix-fixable & --rebuild-tree tried and failed. root@Tower:/dev# reiserfsck --check /dev/sdc1 reiserfsck 3.6.24 Will read-only check consistency of the filesystem on /dev/sdc1 Will put log info to 'stdout' Do you want to run this program?[N/Yes] (note need to type Yes if you do):Yes ########### reiserfsck --check started at Mon Jul 31 20:19:37 2017 ########### Replaying journal: Done. Reiserfs journal '/dev/sdc1' in blocks [18..8211]: 0 transactions replayed Zero bit found in on-disk bitmap after the last valid bit. Checking internal tree.. Bad root block 0. (--rebuild-tree did not complete) Aborted root@Tower:/dev# reiserfsck --fix-fixable /dev/sdc1 reiserfsck 3.6.24 Will check consistency of the filesystem on /dev/sdc1 and will fix what can be fixed without --rebuild-tree Will put log info to 'stdout' Do you want to run this program?[N/Yes] (note need to type Yes if you do):Yes ########### reiserfsck --fix-fixable started at Mon Jul 31 20:33:13 2017 ########### Replaying journal: Done. Reiserfs journal '/dev/sdc1' in blocks [18..8211]: 0 transactions replayed Zero bit found in on-disk bitmap after the last valid bit. Fixed. Checking internal tree.. Bad root block 0. (--rebuild-tree did not complete) Aborted currently running rebuild-tree root@Tower:/dev# reiserfsck --rebuild-tree /dev/sdc1 reiserfsck 3.6.24 ************************************************************* ** Do not run the program with --rebuild-tree unless ** ** something is broken and MAKE A BACKUP before using it. ** ** If you have bad sectors on a drive it is usually a bad ** ** idea to continue using it. Then you probably should get ** ** a working hard drive, copy the file system from the bad ** ** drive to the good one -- dd_rescue is a good tool for ** ** that -- and only then run this program. ** ************************************************************* Will rebuild the filesystem (/dev/sdc1) tree Will put log info to 'stdout' Do you want to run this program?[N/Yes] (note need to type Yes if you do):Yes Replaying journal: Done. Reiserfs journal '/dev/sdc1' in blocks [18..8211]: 0 transactions replayed Zero bit found in on-disk bitmap after the last valid bit. Fixed. ########### reiserfsck --rebuild-tree started at Mon Jul 31 20:39:50 2017 ########### Pass 0: ####### Pass 0 ####### Loading on-disk bitmap .. ok, 215905101 blocks marked used Skipping 23115 blocks (super block, journal, bitmaps) 215881986 blocks will be read 0%. left 196606499, 24743 /sec Edited July 31, 20178 yr by numanuma
July 31, 20178 yr Community Expert 1 hour ago, numanuma said: -rebuild-tree tried and failed failed or 1 hour ago, numanuma said: currently running rebuild-tree ? Also, reiserfsck shouldn't be run with every option blindly, if you're not sure ask for help or you'll risk making things worse.
July 31, 20178 yr Author I think i meant --fix-fixable first. i'm nearly at 80% on --rebuild-tree. From what i've read --check, --fix-fixable and --rebuild-tree are the ones i should be using but please if anybody knows better do chime in. 0%....20%....40%....60%... left 57960765, 21927 /sec How are the latest XFS repair tools on 6.3.5? I've read they aren't that reliable Edited July 31, 20178 yr by numanuma
July 31, 20178 yr Community Expert 4 minutes ago, numanuma said: From what i've read --check, --fix-fixable and --rebuild-tree By the info provided by --check you should have gone to --rebuild-tree directly, --fix-fixable would never work, though that one is usually safe --rebuild-tree and -rebuild-sb should only be used when needed.
July 31, 20178 yr Community Expert 7 minutes ago, numanuma said: I've read they aren't that reliable Where?
July 31, 20178 yr Author 4 minutes ago, johnnie.black said: Where? Under additional comments of drives formatted to xfs Quote If the xfs_repair command fails, and we're hearing numerous reports of this(!)
July 31, 20178 yr Community Expert Maybe when that wiki was written, not lately anyway, it usually works. Edited July 31, 20178 yr by johnnie.black
July 31, 20178 yr Author root@Tower:/dev# reiserfsck --rebuild-tree /dev/sdc1 reiserfsck 3.6.24 ************************************************************* ** Do not run the program with --rebuild-tree unless ** ** something is broken and MAKE A BACKUP before using it. ** ** If you have bad sectors on a drive it is usually a bad ** ** idea to continue using it. Then you probably should get ** ** a working hard drive, copy the file system from the bad ** ** drive to the good one -- dd_rescue is a good tool for ** ** that -- and only then run this program. ** ************************************************************* Will rebuild the filesystem (/dev/sdc1) tree Will put log info to 'stdout' Do you want to run this program?[N/Yes] (note need to type Yes if you do):Yes Replaying journal: Done. Reiserfs journal '/dev/sdc1' in blocks [18..8211]: 0 transactions replayed Zero bit found in on-disk bitmap after the last valid bit. Fixed. ########### reiserfsck --rebuild-tree started at Mon Jul 31 20:39:50 2017 ########### Pass 0: ####### Pass 0 ####### Loading on-disk bitmap .. ok, 215905101 blocks marked used Skipping 23115 blocks (super block, journal, bitmaps) 215881986 blocks will be read 0%....20%....40%....60%....80%....100% left 0, 19325 /sec 2102 directory entries were hashed with "r5" hash. "r5" hash is selected Flushing..finished Read blocks (but not data blocks) 215881986 Leaves among those 214519 Objectids found 2115 Pass 1 (will try to insert 214519 leaves): ####### Pass 1 ####### Looking for allocable blocks .. finished 0%....20%....40%....60%....80%....100% left 0, 114 /sec Flushing..finished 214519 leaves read 214510 inserted 9 not inserted ####### Pass 2 ####### Pass 2: 0%....20%....40%....60%....80%....100% left 0, 0 /sec Flushing..finished Leaves inserted item by item 9 Pass 3 (semantic): ####### Pass 3 ######### ... .Nixon.PDTV.x264-W4F/american.experience.s03e04-e06.nixon.pdtv.x264-w4f.r00vpf-10680: The file [2838554 2838567] has the wrong block count in the StatData (97664) - corrected to (6440) /media/downloading/American.Experience.S03E04-E06.Nixon.PDTV.x264-W4Frebuild_semantic_pass: The entry [2838554 2838571] ("american.experience.s03e04-e06.nixon.pdtv.x264-w4f.r01") in directory [2413036 2838554] points to nowhere - is removed /media/downloading/American.Experience.S03E04-E06.Nixon.PDTV.x264-W4Fvpf-10650: The directory [2413036 2838554] has the wrong size in the StatData (2496) - corrected to (2424) Flushing..finished Files found: 1778 Directories found: 325 Names pointing to nowhere (removed): 1 Pass 3a (looking for lost dir/files): ####### Pass 3a (lost+found pass) ######### Looking for lost directories: Flushing..finished 67765 /sec Empty lost dirs removed 1 Pass 4 - finishedne 136508, 45502 /sec Deleted unreachable items 14 Flushing..finished Syncing..finished ########### reiserfsck finished at Tue Aug 1 00:28:28 2017 ########### root@Tower:/dev# reiserfs is working again, thank you. i thought i was up to date but obviously not. now doing a parity sync and will connect the XFS drive in the morning. when i checked yesterday it would not show up in the webgui
July 31, 20178 yr 15 minutes ago, numanuma said: now doing a parity sync and will connect the XFS drive in the morning If you add a drive to a parity protected array, it will be cleared then formatted, totally erasing any data with no possibility of recovery. If you wish to keep the data, you will need to either set a new config with that drive added and rebuild parity to include it, or mount it outside the array using unassigned devices and copy the data off of it before you add it to the array.
July 31, 20178 yr Author 6 minutes ago, jonathanm said: If you add a drive to a parity protected array, it will be cleared then formatted, totally erasing any data with no possibility of recovery. If you wish to keep the data, you will need to either set a new config with that drive added and rebuild parity to include it, or mount it outside the array using unassigned devices and copy the data off of it before you add it to the array. aaaaand swiftly stopping the parity sync! Edit: on second thought, can't i parity these 2x2TB media drives then New Config tomorrow when it comes to fix the XFS? once that is fixed (pray), i can add back the 2x2TB drives and then add the parity back which wouldn't lose anything? just before i go clicking cancel on anything. i think thats sorta what you said but i want to make sure Edited July 31, 20178 yr by numanuma
August 1, 20178 yr Author is there anything i can do to help my parity drive showing as faulty in the webgui?
August 1, 20178 yr Community Expert You may be better off not using parity for now. It is invalid anyway and can't help with these other problems.
August 1, 20178 yr Author Connected the 4TB XFS drive, it is not showing up in both the gui or /dev/. ideas? 12 hours ago, trurl said: You may be better off not using parity for now. It is invalid anyway and can't help with these other problems. The parity was going suuuper slow anyway, is that because the parity drive is showing as faulty in the gui? Edited August 1, 20178 yr by numanuma
August 1, 20178 yr Community Expert 50 minutes ago, numanuma said: Connected the 4TB XFS drive, it is not showing up in both the gui or /dev/. ideas? The parity was going suuuper slow anyway, is that because the parity drive is showing as faulty in the gui? The indicator in the GUI was just because parity was invalid. I haven't really been following this thread but it doesn't look like you ever posted a diagnostic. Go to Tools - Diagnostics and post the complete diagnostics zip file. Possibly you have hardware issues with one or more drives in addition to your filesystem problems.
August 1, 20178 yr Author Sorry, here it is. Please, tell me i can still salvage my data? tower-diagnostics-20170801-1758.zip Edit: Is my 4TB drive showing up in df.txt as the 3.7TB? The amounts look about right from when i last saw it mounted in the gui. My 5TB parity drive isn't showing up in that file though? It is in other files, but then the 4TB is not Edited August 1, 20178 yr by numanuma
August 1, 20178 yr Community Expert There's no 4TB disk connected/detected. 43 minutes ago, numanuma said: Edit: Is my 4TB drive showing up in df.txt as the 3.7TB? That's /mnt/user , the 2 data disks joined.
August 1, 20178 yr Author 10 minutes ago, johnnie.black said: There's no 4TB disk connected/detected. That's /mnt/user , the 2 data disks joined. Damn ;_; Can you advise on what to do next? i'm at a loss. currently consolidating the 2x2TB into 1x2TB so to remove the known faulty reiserfs drive i just repaired
August 1, 20178 yr Community Expert Try a different port/cable, if the 4TB disk is not detected (ie, it's dead) there's nothing you can do now. Edited August 1, 20178 yr by johnnie.black
August 1, 20178 yr Community Expert They should be able to recover most or all of it, but it's usually quite expensive, depends on the value of the data, I never used any so can't recommend a service, it will also depend on where you're located, but other members may have some suggestions.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.