September 27, 20178 yr Hasn't been a good week for me. So this all started on Sept 23rd when I was away and disk 3 failed (the server was frozen). Upon reboot I had disk 3 (WD 4TB RED) showing "Device is disabled, content emulated" When I returned to work on the server. I removed the drive and installed another WD 4TB Red. The drive was detected, and added, and rebuild began (approx 20-22 hours). During that parity, the device went yellow, and contents was emulated. (sigh) Parity finished rebuild So reading some more online, I read about cabling and my SAS card. I changed out the breakout cable + moved the SAS card to another PCIe16X Again I started the server and ran a parity check. Everything checked, and was 100% successful. I rebooted the server and it came back online with no concerns. I then started to write data to my array etc. During the copy I found 'taracopy' say network device (unraid) unassailable. I went back to the WebGUI and refreshed and then saw another error on Disk 3"Device is disabled, content emulated" The device had a RED X and I checked out the Dashboard, and it was also FAILING S.M.A.R.T. I checked the .log file and there is a ton of write/sector errors. Keep in mind both of these WD 4TB REDs were precleared prior to use (from brand new) Now I have another WD 4TB RED sealed, and may pre-clear it before adding (takes 48 hours) But what I am trying to determine if it is actually the drives itself or the SAS card [ CONTROLLER: SUPERMICRO AOC-SASLP-MV8 ] or something else. Very sad and time consuming, need to get back and operational. I was looking if there was any assistance. syslog posted below syslog.txt Edited September 27, 20178 yr by bombz
September 27, 20178 yr Community Expert SASLP is not recommended for unRAID v6, LSI HBAs are, but it won't cause SMART issues on the disk, if SMART is failing the disk is failing. Did the first replaced disk also had SMART issues or it was just disable?
September 27, 20178 yr Author The first disk replaced was JUST disabled. There was NO S.M.A.R.T issues with the first disk. I am currently pre-clearing a BRAND NEW WD RED, just broke it open and pre-clearing on another workstation/PC What would you recommend going forward. I have no problem purchasing a better, or recommended SAS card. I bought this back in the version 4 or 5 era. I would love a link so I can look it up. I still have a spare on-board SATA port I can use. Should I try the disk (replacement disk) on that SATA port? I also have a spare SATA cable on my breakout cables (on the other SAS port) Should I attempt that. Should I be buying a new card ? LSI 9300-8i PCI-Express 3.0 SATA / SAS 8-Port SAS3 12Gb/s HBA - Single--Avago Technologies https://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816118217 LSI Internal SATA/SAS 9211-8i 6Gb/s PCI-Express 2.0 RAID Controller Card, Single--Avago Technologies https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816118112 SAS9211-8I 8PORT Int 6GB Sata+sas Pcie 2.0 https://www.amazon.ca/SAS9211-8I-8PORT-Int-Sata-Pcie/dp/B002RL8I7M Can I use my same breakout cables with this. Are we sure this is the SAS card posing the concerns?Should I be buying a new SAS card? Edited September 27, 20178 yr by bombz
September 27, 20178 yr Community Expert The 2nd failure was the disk, not the controller, do you have diagnostics and/or SMART from the 1st? Without them can't say what happened. Still the SASLP is not recommended because of its low performance and tendency to drop disks without reason, both LSI you linked will work though most look for server pulls on ebay where they are significantly cheaper.
September 27, 20178 yr Author here are my old syspulls and diag unraid-diagnostics-20170925-0045.zip unraid-diagnostics-20170925-1055-after-complete.zip unraid-syslog-20170925-0044.zip unraid-syslog-20170925-1054-after-complete.zip
September 27, 20178 yr Community Expert what about the 3rd link I added?It's the same as the 2nd.Also, you can use your current cables.
September 27, 20178 yr Author 7 minutes ago, johnnie.black said: It's the same as the 2nd. Also, you can use your current cables. OK, ordering...SAS9211-8I 8PORT Int 6GB Sata+sas Pcie 2.0 https://www.amazon.ca/SAS9211-8I-8PORT-Int-Sata-Pcie/dp/B002RL8I7M There is nothing worse then having the incorrect hardware for an important job (sad) Standard Shipping — get it Oct. 26-Nov. 8 Edited September 27, 20178 yr by bombz
September 27, 20178 yr Author 39 minutes ago, johnnie.black said: I may take a chance, and toss the other DISK 3 back in (the first one) Which does have data on it, and hook it to onboard SATA and see if it works What's your thoughts on that ? I am going to head to bed, get a fresh start on this tomorrow. Thank you for the assistance so far, and let me know your thoughts for now I am keeping the server online, spun down until feedback is provided. Kind of learning on the fly with this new concern Thank you for all the help !! Edited September 27, 20178 yr by bombz
September 27, 20178 yr Community Expert Check the SMART report first, and you'll still need to rebuild it.
September 27, 20178 yr Author OK if SMART passes etc, and I rebuild it, and we still have a concern, i wonder what the next step is then Posted is the current disk status WDC_WD40EFRX-68WT0N0_WD-WCC4E0052905-20170927-1132.txt Edited September 27, 20178 yr by bombz
September 27, 20178 yr Author updated sig as UnRaid version = unRAID Server Pro version: unRAIDServer-6.3.5-x86_64 Pro Here is the "original" disk3 that I pulled out initially WDC_WD40EFRX-68WT0N0_WD-WCC4EHXH65U4-20170927-1151.txt ***********************Replacement disk installed.Start will start Parity-Sync and/or Data-Rebuild. Yes I want to do this **************************** I am doing this now, it is going to take a good 20 hours I started this process, and DISK3 has a orange triangle next to it. Saying... device contents emulated Also, this disk is NO LONGER plugged into the SuperMicro SAS card, rather the Marvell on-board SATA port / chipset I have also posted NEW syslog.txt for any other info that may be needed syslog.txt Edited September 27, 20178 yr by bombz
September 27, 20178 yr Community Expert I started this process, and DISK3 has a orange triangle next to it. Saying... device contents emulated This is normal Also, this disk is NO LONGER plugged into the SuperMicro SAS card, rather the Marvell on-board SATA port / chipset Supermicro SASLP is also Marvell.
September 27, 20178 yr Author did you see anything else in my logs that are cause for concern by chance?
September 27, 20178 yr Community Expert 5 minutes ago, bombz said: did you see anything else in my logs that are cause for concern by chance? Nope, SMART for old disk looks good, and nothing of concern in the logs so far, well, maybe all your disks still being reiser, you should consider converting to xfs, reiser is dead.
September 27, 20178 yr Author OK that's good. Thanks for looking at everything! Currently Parity-Sync / Data-Rebuild 18.5 % So I hope everything goes well! I would love to move to the new file system! I wonder how much of a pain that is to do being there is data across all drives? I am sure there is a guide or tutorial ? Am I at risk of data loss converting ?
September 27, 20178 yr Community Expert https://forums.lime-technology.com/topic/54769-format-xfs-on-replacement-drive-convert-from-rfs-to-xfs/
September 27, 20178 yr Author Thanks, I was reading that too :-) That's a big task! Is there a disadvantage to staying with RFS ?
September 27, 20178 yr Community Expert Is there a disadvantage to staying with RFS ? Terrible performance in some cases, e.g., it can take minutes before a copy begins to an almost full disk. Some users have the system go unresponsive after a few days/weeks. It's not being actively developed/maintained.
September 27, 20178 yr Author That's exactly what I am experiencing When I do a file copy from Windows system to my array, it takes a while for it to fire up, and even then so, takes time during the copy to complete. I want to switch over, but that's a very very long tedious task it seems Reading about it, it seems clear and confusing at the same time That may be a task for another day, month, year. I just stuck with it when I started using Unraid back in version 3 or 4 (when I purchased it)
September 28, 20178 yr Author Some .log line errors I noticed are concerning me Sep 27 11:49:38 UnRAID kernel: sas: --- Exit sas_scsi_recover_host: busy: 0 failed: 0 tries: 1 Sep 27 11:49:38 UnRAID kernel: sas: Enter sas_scsi_recover_host busy: 0 failed: 0 Sep 27 11:50:05 UnRAID avahi-daemon[2584]: WARNING: No NSS support for mDNS detected, consider installing nss-mdns! Sep 27 11:50:57 UnRAID root: error: webGui/include/Boot.php: wrong csrf_token SCSI is prob relating to some type of controller or chipset ?
September 28, 20178 yr Author I will test for a week and close off this thread. So far it seems stable. It will be weeks until I get my LSI in the mail, and I will pull out that supermicro card. It's a shame I cannot use the supermicro anymore. Perhaps I will keep it around on stand-by in case I ever run into SAS card failure. Seems SAS cards take forever to get / ship in .ca
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.