JorgeB Posted March 19, 2018 Share Posted March 19, 2018 2 minutes ago, tential said: No modify flag set You need to tun without -n Quote Link to comment
tential Posted March 19, 2018 Author Share Posted March 19, 2018 Phase 1 - find and verify superblock... Phase 2 - using internal log - zero log... - scan filesystem freespace and inode maps... - found root inode chunk Phase 3 - for each AG... - scan and clear agi unlinked lists... - process known inodes and perform inode discovery... - agno = 0 - agno = 1 - agno = 2 - agno = 3 - agno = 4 bad CRC for inode 8589934698 bad CRC for inode 8589934698, will rewrite cleared inode 8589934698 bmap rec out of order, inode 9495795062 entry 88 [o s c] [229862 770801601 1025], 87 [240103 770807746 12287] correcting nextents for inode 9495795062 bad data fork in inode 9495795062 cleared inode 9495795062 - agno = 5 - agno = 6 - agno = 7 - process newly discovered inodes... Phase 4 - check for duplicate blocks... - setting up duplicate extent list... - check for inodes claiming duplicate blocks... - agno = 1 - agno = 0 - agno = 2 - agno = 3 - agno = 4 - agno = 5 - agno = 6 - agno = 7 entry "flhd-sps13e11.mkv.part" in shortform directory 9495795009 references free inode 9495795062 junking entry "flhd-sps13e11.mkv.part" in directory inode 9495795009 corrected i8 count in directory 9495795009, was 2, now 1 Phase 5 - rebuild AG headers and trees... - reset superblock... Phase 6 - check inode connectivity... - resetting contents of realtime bitmap and summary inodes - traversing filesystem ... - traversal finished ... - moving disconnected inodes to lost+found ... Phase 7 - verify and correct link counts... done Very fast, is that to be expected? Quote Link to comment
tential Posted March 19, 2018 Author Share Posted March 19, 2018 Ok, hopefully I get long stability now! I only have ~15 TB of free space, and then it's read only for the most part. That will make me feel a little better. Quote Link to comment
tential Posted May 3, 2018 Author Share Posted May 3, 2018 Hello, been running well without a hitch for awhile now. I still have my 5TB drive that failed in my server and haven't taken it out yet. I'm going to today, but wanted to make sure it was necessary. I ran an extended Smart Test, pretty sure this is telling me to throw this drive away. Am I right? tower-smart-20180503-0642.zip Quote Link to comment
JorgeB Posted May 3, 2018 Share Posted May 3, 2018 10 minutes ago, tential said: pretty sure this is telling me to throw this drive awa Yes, it failed the extended test. Quote Link to comment
tential Posted May 4, 2018 Author Share Posted May 4, 2018 On 5/3/2018 at 9:01 AM, johnnie.black said: Yes, it failed the extended test. Thanks, which device is it connected to? Going to replace it with a 8TBtower-diagnostics-20180504-1443.zip Quote Link to comment
JorgeB Posted May 5, 2018 Share Posted May 5, 2018 8 hours ago, tential said: Thanks, which device is it connected to? It's on the 4 port Marvell controller. Quote Link to comment
tential Posted May 8, 2018 Author Share Posted May 8, 2018 On 5/5/2018 at 1:37 AM, johnnie.black said: It's on the 4 port Marvell controller. Thanks, found it quickly! Finally almost done. Just got to clear the drives/get it added to pool, and then get the server racked up in it's cabinet. Thanks so much! Almost there! Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.