SSD Posted March 13, 2018 Share Posted March 13, 2018 Curious if my old trusty Hitachi 2T UD is starting to fail. Here is the smart report SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 16 Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds: ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE 1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000b 100 100 016 Pre-fail Always - 0 2 Throughput_Performance 0x0005 131 131 054 Pre-fail Offline - 108 3 Spin_Up_Time 0x0007 115 115 024 Pre-fail Always - 624 (Average 629) 4 Start_Stop_Count 0x0012 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 1370 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 100 100 005 Pre-fail Always - 0 7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x000b 100 100 067 Pre-fail Always - 0 8 Seek_Time_Performance 0x0005 121 121 020 Pre-fail Offline - 35 9 Power_On_Hours 0x0012 093 093 000 Old_age Always - 53681 10 Spin_Retry_Count 0x0013 100 100 060 Pre-fail Always - 0 12 Power_Cycle_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 352 192 Power-Off_Retract_Count 0x0032 099 099 000 Old_age Always - 2339 193 Load_Cycle_Count 0x0012 099 099 000 Old_age Always - 2339 194 Temperature_Celsius 0x0002 240 240 000 Old_age Always - 25 (Min/Max 8/38) 196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 0 197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0022 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 0 198 Offline_Uncorrectable 0x0008 100 100 000 Old_age Offline - 0 199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count 0x000a 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 0 Taken after I say this in my syslog Quote Mar 12 17:22:28 merlin kernel: sd 10:0:3:0: [sdm] tag#0 UNKNOWN(0x2003) Result: hostbyte=0x00 driverbyte=0x00Mar 12 17:22:28 merlin kernel: sd 10:0:3:0: [sdm] tag#0 CDB: opcode=0x28 28 00 82 52 40 27 00 00 08 00Mar 12 17:22:28 merlin kernel: print_req_error: I/O error, dev sdm, sector 2186428455 Any thoughts? Quote Link to comment
tdallen Posted March 13, 2018 Share Posted March 13, 2018 Maybe run a long test if you haven’t yet? Quote Link to comment
JorgeB Posted March 13, 2018 Share Posted March 13, 2018 SMART looks perfect, and it's difficult to interpret the LSI errors codes, but looks more like a connection issue. Quote Link to comment
Kode Posted March 13, 2018 Share Posted March 13, 2018 I'd agree with johnnie.black, SMART looks perfect. I read somewhere that connection errors usually show up under 199, but that is empty as well. Quote Link to comment
JorgeB Posted March 13, 2018 Share Posted March 13, 2018 (edited) 11 minutes ago, Kode said: I read somewhere that connection errors usually show up under 199 That's for CRC errors, timeout errors don't appear on SMART, I was referring to the error opcode=0x28 28 00 82 52 40 27 00 00 08 00 Edited March 13, 2018 by johnnie.black Quote Link to comment
SSD Posted March 15, 2018 Author Share Posted March 15, 2018 I'll keep an eye on it and see if I get repeats. @Squid - not sure if this is a good candidate for a FCP warning. Quote Link to comment
coolspot Posted June 23, 2019 Share Posted June 23, 2019 I'm seeing this exact same error, but different sector on a few of my drives: Mar 12 17:22:28 merlin kernel: sd 10:0:3:0: [sdm] tag#0 UNKNOWN(0x2003) Result: hostbyte=0x00 driverbyte=0x00 Mar 12 17:22:28 merlin kernel: sd 10:0:3:0: [sdm] tag#0 CDB: opcode=0x28 28 00 82 52 40 27 00 00 08 00 Mar 12 17:22:28 merlin kernel: print_req_error: I/O error, dev sdm, sector 2186428455 In my case: [Sun Jun 23 13:05:35 2019] sd 1:0:28:0: [sdab] tag#18 UNKNOWN(0x2003) Result: hostbyte=0x00 driverbyte=0x00 [Sun Jun 23 13:05:35 2019] sd 1:0:28:0: [sdab] tag#18 CDB: opcode=0x28 28 00 00 01 62 c0 00 02 00 00 [Sun Jun 23 13:05:35 2019] print_req_error: I/O error, dev sdab, sector 90816 I don't think it's a disk failure ... but rather something to do with SMART or controller communication with the drive. When I had the unassigned plugin installed I was seeing a lot more of these errors. I think it's more of a compatibility issue than hardware error. The error above is from a Crucial M500 running off a LSI 9207-8i on a BPN-SAS2-826EL2 backplane. Quote Link to comment
Squid Posted June 23, 2019 Share Posted June 23, 2019 3 minutes ago, coolspot said: but rather something to do with SMART or controller communication with the drive You should post the full diagnostics before you reboot to put the error(s) in context 3 minutes ago, coolspot said: Crucial M500 running off a LSI 9207-8i Just an FYI, but most HBA's do not properly (if at all) support TRIM on an attached SSD. You're far better off connecting it directly to the motherboard Quote Link to comment
coolspot Posted June 23, 2019 Share Posted June 23, 2019 3 hours ago, Squid said: You should post the full diagnostics before you reboot to put the error(s) in context Just an FYI, but most HBA's do not properly (if at all) support TRIM on an attached SSD. You're far better off connecting it directly to the motherboard The LSI 9207 does detect the drive as a SATA-SSD, does that mean it supports TRIM? If TRIM is not supported, can it be run manually via a schedule? Does that work or does it mean that even manual TRIM won't work on HBAs. Quote Link to comment
JorgeB Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 8 hours ago, coolspot said: The LSI 9207 does detect the drive as a SATA-SSD, does that mean it supports TRIM? It does but only with SSDs that support read zeros after trim, which the MX500 doesn't, so trim won't work, use the onboard SATA ports instead. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.