Unraid OS version 6.6.3 available


limetech

Recommended Posts

Since upgrading to 6.6.3 I do experience various problems on my two Unraid server:

 

1.) Kernel segfaults in ld.

 

2.) All the disks are spun up most of the time.

 

3.) None of my schedules (SSD Trim, User.Scripts, ...) run.

 

Diagnostics attached.

 

Oct 23 08:06:01 Tower crond[1748]: exit status 1 from user root /usr/local/emhttp/plugins/dynamix/scripts/monitor &> /dev/null
Oct 23 08:06:01 Tower kernel: crond[7804]: segfault at 152800000008 ip 00001528d7b44858 sp 00007ffc53b1ef00 error 4 in ld-2.28.so (deleted)[1528d7b35000+20000]
Oct 23 08:06:01 Tower kernel: Code: 8b 1b 48 03 58 08 48 8b 52 08 48 c1 ea 03 85 d2 74 23 8d 42 ff 4c 8d 74 c3 08 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 4c 89 ea 4c 89 e6 89 ef <ff> 13 48 83 c3 08 49 39 de 75 ed 5b 5d 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e c3 0f 1f
Oct 23 08:06:01 Tower kernel: crond[7805]: segfault at 152800000008 ip 00001528d7b44858 sp 00007ffc53b1ef00 error 4 in ld-2.28.so (deleted)[1528d7b35000+20000]
Oct 23 08:06:01 Tower kernel: Code: 8b 1b 48 03 58 08 48 8b 52 08 48 c1 ea 03 85 d2 74 23 8d 42 ff 4c 8d 74 c3 08 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 4c 89 ea 4c 89 e6 89 ef <ff> 13 48 83 c3 08 49 39 de 75 ed 5b 5d 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e c3 0f 1f 
Oct 23 08:06:16 Tower crond[1748]: exit status 1 from user root /etc/rc.d/rc.diskinfo --daemon &> /dev/null
Oct 23 08:07:01 Tower kernel: crond[8810]: segfault at 152800000008 ip 00001528d7b44858 sp 00007ffc53b1ef00 error 4 in ld-2.28.so (deleted)[1528d7b35000+20000]
Oct 23 08:07:01 Tower kernel: Code: 8b 1b 48 03 58 08 48 8b 52 08 48 c1 ea 03 85 d2 74 23 8d 42 ff 4c 8d 74 c3 08 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 4c 89 ea 4c 89 e6 89 ef <ff> 13 48 83 c3 08 49 
Oct 23 08:07:01 Tower kernel: crond[8811]: segfault at 152800000008 ip 00001528d7b44858 sp 00007ffc53b1ef00 error 4
Oct 23 08:07:01 Tower kernel: 39 de 75 ed 5b 5d 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e c3 0f 1f 
Oct 23 08:07:01 Tower kernel: in ld-2.28.so (deleted)[1528d7b35000+20000]
Oct 23 08:07:01 Tower kernel: Code: 8b 1b 48 03 58 08 48 8b 52 08 48 c1 ea 03 85 d2 74 23 8d 42 ff 4c 8d 74 c3 08 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 4c 89 ea 4c 89 e6 89 ef <ff> 13 48 83 c3 08 49 39 de 75 ed 5b 5d 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e c3 0f 1f 
Oct 23 08:07:01 Tower crond[1748]: exit status 1 from user root /usr/local/emhttp/plugins/dynamix/scripts/monitor &> /dev/null
Oct 23 08:07:01 Tower crond[1748]: exit status 1 from user root /etc/rc.d/rc.diskinfo --daemon &> /dev/null
Oct 23 08:08:01 Tower crond[1748]: exit status 1 from user root /etc/rc.d/rc.diskinfo --daemon &> /dev/null
Oct 23 08:08:01 Tower kernel: crond[9845]: segfault at 152800000008 ip 00001528d7b44858 sp 00007ffc53b1ef00 error 4 in ld-2.28.so (deleted)[1528d7b35000+20000]
Oct 23 08:08:01 Tower kernel: Code: 8b 1b 48 03 58 08 48 8b 52 08 48 c1 ea 03 85 d2 74 23 8d 42 ff 4c 8d 74 c3 08 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 4c 89 ea 4c 89 e6 89 ef <ff> 13 48 83 c3 08 49 39 de 75 ed 5b 5d 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e c3 0f 1f 
Oct 23 08:08:16 Tower crond[1748]: exit status 1 from user root /usr/local/emhttp/plugins/dynamix/scripts/monitor &> /dev/null
Oct 23 08:09:01 Tower crond[1748]: exit status 1 from user root /usr/local/emhttp/plugins/dynamix/scripts/monitor &> /dev/null
Oct 23 08:09:01 Tower kernel: crond[10959]: segfault at 152800000008 ip 00001528d7b44858 sp 00007ffc53b1ef00 error 4 in ld-2.28.so (deleted)[1528d7b35000+20000]
Oct 23 08:09:01 Tower kernel: Code: 8b 1b 48 03 58 08 48 8b 52 08 48 c1 ea 03 85 d2 74 23 8d 42 ff 4c 8d 74 c3 08 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 4c 89 ea 4c 89 e6 89 ef <ff> 13 48 83 c3 08 49 39 de 75 ed 5b 5d 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e c3 0f 1f 
Oct 23 08:09:16 Tower crond[1748]: exit status 1 from user root /etc/rc.d/rc.diskinfo --daemon &> /dev/null

Is it possible that this DevPack "glibc" is still not fixed?

 

tower-diagnostics-20181023-0815.zip

Link to comment

I've been waiting for days just to see that everything was okay before upgrading. I did notice that most of the reported issues were related to some plugins, I only have CA and FCP, so I think I am okay...

 

I did the upgrade, my Java viewer also worked w/o problems, however I did notice a single error, and few warnings. This error, and some of the warnings I was told to disregard them in the past, and perhaps keep my eyes on my MB bios update for a fix, but perhaps there are 2 additional warnings that I just noticed... I would appreciate it if someone looked at these and told me if I can just ignore them...

 

Thnx

 

 

 

unraid-diagnostics-20181023-1145.zip

Edited by Mat1926
Link to comment
17 hours ago, Frank1940 said:

Well, you want one of us to go through all of the updates and pick out the ones that are important to you?  Come on, give us a break.  Everything in these updates is important to the various different users of Unraid for different reasons!  Some are security updates.  Some are  updates to Samba, some address hardware issues, driver issues, incompatibilities, and some are new drivers for the latest hardware.    

 

It is easy enough to roll back if you find some issue or you can request assistance to solving the problem.  But understand that waiting until some future version in the distance future may give you a lot of upgrade problems because of the small adjustments and tweaks that were detailed out as each update came out.  You will have to make your own decision about about when to move up to a new version but I can assure you that keeping in the current major release version will give you the fewest problems over the long haul!  (Plus, unlike other software, all updates are FREE!!!) 

Woh, no offense dude 🤔

 

Of course I don't expect someone to plow through the (pretty darn long!) list of updated things. Of course I don't expect someone to know what is important to me.

 

I do, however, expect the author to know which bits in the changelog are important in a general sense, and which are minor fixes.

As you said, I can rollback (in theory) to a previous version. But in order for me to know what I should test before I choose whether or not to rollback, I need to know *what* to test. Obviously, I and everyone else, cannot be expected to test absolutely everything on absolutely every release. And with a more concise list of improvements, it's easier to know if I should upgrade in the first place.

 

Please remember: a changelog is seldom a great way to communicate what has been changed. A changelog is for developers, and users who want to know all the ins and outs.

 

The bottom line is that for some people, including myself, the changelog is just too verbose. I can go ahead and ignore it, but rollback if it doesn't work, but anyone will tell you that's generally bad practice.

 

Btw, this is commercial software. We should expect at least some level of professionalism, which for me includes a moderated list of improvements on a new version. unRAID is not the millionth open source project. If it were, we would not have this argument.

Link to comment
2 hours ago, thany said:

Woh, no offense dude 🤔

 

Of course I don't expect someone to plow through the (pretty darn long!) list of updated things. Of course I don't expect someone to know what is important to me.

 

I do, however, expect the author to know which bits in the changelog are important in a general sense, and which are minor fixes.

As you said, I can rollback (in theory) to a previous version. But in order for me to know what I should test before I choose whether or not to rollback, I need to know *what* to test. Obviously, I and everyone else, cannot be expected to test absolutely everything on absolutely every release. And with a more concise list of improvements, it's easier to know if I should upgrade in the first place.

 

Please remember: a changelog is seldom a great way to communicate what has been changed. A changelog is for developers, and users who want to know all the ins and outs.

 

The bottom line is that for some people, including myself, the changelog is just too verbose. I can go ahead and ignore it, but rollback if it doesn't work, but anyone will tell you that's generally bad practice.

 

Btw, this is commercial software. We should expect at least some level of professionalism, which for me includes a moderated list of improvements on a new version. unRAID is not the millionth open source project. If it were, we would not have this argument.

Major releases have "new features"

Point releases have bug fixes and security fixes.

 

Pretty straight forward release ideology *shrugs*

 

Also to expect them to list what every piece of linux does and what the new version they upgraded to fixes would be better spent on development.

 

A simple search in google for your questions on the specific packages Unraid updated will provide better information directly from the developers of those packages.

 

 

 

 

Edited by Dazog
Link to comment
10 hours ago, bonienl said:

Uninstall Devpack and Nerdpack plugins and test again

Ok, but i do need nerdpack e.g. for python, git, perl etc. but also for preclear. Is there an alternative for nerdpack then? Or is it ok to uninstall, upgrade unraid and then reinstall nerdpack? 

Link to comment
7 minutes ago, Zonediver said:

It seems, that since 6.6.3 the plugin Cache Directories is no longer working.

Cache dirs has (or had?) an issue where it doesn't start up after a reboot.  Go to its settings and toggle the enable function.

8 minutes ago, Zonediver said:

But the most strange thng is, every time "all" disk spin up... not cool...

Because the system looks for the file(s) on disk 1.  If it doesn't find it, it goes to disk 2 etc...

Link to comment
2 minutes ago, Squid said:

Cache dirs has (or had?) an issue where it doesn't start up after a reboot.  Go to its settings and toggle the enable function.

Because the system looks for the file(s) on disk 1.  If it doesn't find it, it goes to disk 2 etc...

Thanks for your help - Folder caching function was "Disabled"... strange...

Edited by Zonediver
Link to comment
6 minutes ago, russlock said:

have deleted dynamix.plg and rebooted and I have got a new screen up but very clunky and no option to click when I hover over buttons as I was going to try and revert back.

Something is wrong with your screen capture (At least with what is being displayed)!   I would close Unraid instances in your browser  and try try clearing your browser cache.  Even another reboot if that does not  clean things up...

Edited by Frank1940
Link to comment
14 minutes ago, Frank1940 said:

Something is wrong with your screen capture (At least with what is being displayed)!   I would close Unraid instances in your browser  and try try clearing your browser cache.  Even another reboot if that does not  clean things up...

trying another reboot now. screen grab is fine on every other site, plus when I hover over buttons or menus I have no options to click.

 

ok, rebooted and it is still the same with no options to revert back or options to click when in tools or settings etc

 

Edited by russlock
Link to comment

Capture.thumb.JPG.7ae6e6fada99d9f10a6987b1ba7d3d04.JPG

 

This is what my screen looks like in Chrome and Firefox.  I have just tried it with Firefox, Chrome and IE  (ver 11.0.9600.19129).  I am seeing the same thing as you with IE.  Don't know what the problem is  with IE.  Perhaps @bonienl could jump in at this point. 

 

EDIT:  Both Firefox and Chrome work fine.  IE has problems with any boxes or icons in the main tabs. Can switch between the main tabs but nothing works inside the tabs.  

Edited by Frank1940
Link to comment
4 minutes ago, Frank1940 said:

Capture.thumb.JPG.7ae6e6fada99d9f10a6987b1ba7d3d04.JPG

 

This is what my screen looks like in Chrome and Firefox.  I have just tried it with Firefox, Chrome and IE  (ver 11.0.9600.19129).  I am seeing the same thing as you with IE.  Don't know what the problem is  with IE.  Perhaps @bonienl could jump in at this point. 

yes, I use IE 11 and it must be this as I have tried it in chrome and it works just fine.

Edited by russlock
Link to comment
2 minutes ago, russlock said:

yes, I use IE 11

You don't have at least one of the other browsers installed?  If that is the condition, it surprises me a bit.  I had thought most people were moving away from IE.  I just googled and IE is only being provided with security updates at this point. So basically it is a end-of-life product. 

Link to comment
3 minutes ago, Frank1940 said:

You don't have at least one of the other browsers installed?  If that is the condition, it surprises me a bit.  I had thought most people were moving away from IE.  I just googled and IE is only being provided with security updates at this point. So basically it is a end-of-life product. 

yes, chrome, but never used it. I guess I will have to start now, but thanks for sorting everyone

Link to comment
  • limetech unfeatured and unpinned this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.