CoZ Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 5 hours ago, binhex said: Honestly no apology required, I wonder if you would be so kind as to link to the bug (issue) Sent from my EML-L29 using Tapatalk Here is the pull request for the bug: https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/pull/844 And here is the initial issue: https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/issues/478 1 Quote Link to comment
CoZ Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 Just an FYI for everyone who has an NVIDIA GPU. The Linuxserver I/O docker for NVIDIA cards will support H/W Transcoding in Jellyfin (just like it does in Emby without the PAID subscription model) Got it up and running a few hours ago and tested out two concurrent streams on my 1050ti 3 Quote Link to comment
Trunkton Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 Just an FYI for everyone who has an NVIDIA GPU. The Linuxserver I/O docker for NVIDIA cards will support H/W Transcoding in Jellyfin (just like it does in Emby without the PAID subscription model) Got it up and running a few hours ago and tested out two concurrent streams on my 1050tiIts reading stuff like this that adds fuel to my itch to burn money up on a Quattro to play with the new NVIDIA UNRAID support even though there is just 3 users max running plex. So plex, now jellyfin, possibly a minecraft docker and who knows what else. Quote Link to comment
CoZ Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 (edited) 19 minutes ago, Trunkton said: Its reading stuff like this that adds fuel to my itch to burn money up on a Quattro to play with the new NVIDIA UNRAID support even though there is just 3 users max running plex. So plex, now jellyfin, possibly a minecraft docker and who knows what else. If the "Quattro" is the P2000(?) card, than that card supports unlimited transcodes, FYI. Edited February 14, 2019 by CoZ Wasn't vague enough initially Quote Link to comment
Hoopster Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 (edited) 14 minutes ago, CoZ said: If the "Quattro" is the P2000(?) card, than that card supports unlimited transcodes, FYI. Yes, at least a P2000 Quadro is required for unrestricted streams. The P400 and P1000 are limited to 2 streams. Edited February 14, 2019 by Hoopster Quote Link to comment
MickeyJello Posted February 20, 2019 Share Posted February 20, 2019 Is anyone else having a problem pulling down version 10.2.0-1-01 that was built a couple of days ago? I have removed the old image and pulled down the new one but I keep just getting the 10.1.0-3-03 version from a couple of weeks ago. If i look at Docker hub i notice both releases have the same commit source and i'm wondering if that is the issue here. Previous releases have a unique source. Quote Link to comment
binhex Posted February 20, 2019 Author Share Posted February 20, 2019 1 hour ago, MickeyJello said: If i look at Docker hub i notice both releases have the same commit source and i'm wondering if that is the issue here thats not the issue, they have the same commit because there were no code changes on github, that doesnt mean that they pull down the same version of the app though during build time, what is defined in "repository" when you left click the icon in docker tab and select edit? Quote Link to comment
MickeyJello Posted February 20, 2019 Share Posted February 20, 2019 I show : binhex/arch-jellyfin as the repository. The Docker Hub URL is : https://registry.hub.docker.com/u/binhex/arch-jellyfin/ Quote Link to comment
binhex Posted February 20, 2019 Author Share Posted February 20, 2019 I show : binhex/arch-jellyfin as the repository. The Docker Hub URL is : https://registry.hub.docker.com/u/binhex/arch-jellyfin/ Ok that's fine, I think I see the issue, attempting a new build now.Sent from my EML-L29 using Tapatalk 1 Quote Link to comment
MickeyJello Posted February 21, 2019 Share Posted February 21, 2019 Thanks for looking into this. The good news is that the new version does show as 10.2.0.0. The bad news is that it fails to start up in Unraid. I tried renaming my appdata folder in case there was something off there. The result was the same. Quote Link to comment
slimshizn Posted February 21, 2019 Share Posted February 21, 2019 (edited) Yep same issue, latest version is not working. jellyfin/jellyfin is working in the meantime. Edited February 21, 2019 by slimshizn Quote Link to comment
CapriciousCrawdad Posted February 21, 2019 Share Posted February 21, 2019 Oh man, I was SO EXCITED when I saw an update available. I should've checked here before upgrading but now I've got the same issue as above. I know you'll get it sorted but I just wanted to say - Thank you so much for your work on this container! I am blown away by the rapid progress of this project and I'm excited for it to fully replace Plex. Quote Link to comment
binhex Posted February 21, 2019 Author Share Posted February 21, 2019 Looks like they have made a change to the arguments should be easy enough to fix I'll take a look shortlySent from my EML-L29 using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment
binhex Posted February 21, 2019 Author Share Posted February 21, 2019 2 hours ago, binhex said: Looks like they have made a change to the arguments should be easy enough to fix I'll take a look shortly Sent from my EML-L29 using Tapatalk new image now built, please pull down, it was a little bit more work than first thought as i have created more structure to the /config folder, obviously i then need to deal with existing data, so i THINK i got everything covered (works in testing), if you have issues or missing configuration then please can you ssh to the host and issue the following, so i can see what hasnt been moved over:- ls -al <host path defined for /config> e.g. ls -al /mnt/user/appdata/binhex-jellyfin/ Quote Link to comment
MickeyJello Posted February 21, 2019 Share Posted February 21, 2019 Looking good! Unraid automatically pulled down the new image and it is working. My user account was renamed to 'nobody', but that's the only issue I can see thus far. Thanks for the extra work on this one. I think there are a lot of us that have high hopes for this project as both Plex and Emby keep pulling in more.. corporate directions. Quote Link to comment
binhex Posted February 21, 2019 Author Share Posted February 21, 2019 12 minutes ago, MickeyJello said: My user account was renamed to 'nobody', but that's the only issue I can see thus far i THINK that probably was already the case, user 'nobody' is the account used to run the jellyfin process and thus its probably just picking that up, dunno if you can rename/alias it using the jellyfin ui, i would personally tend to ignore it though. Quote Link to comment
MickeyJello Posted February 21, 2019 Share Posted February 21, 2019 The user was named differently previously, but it was easy to just rename it again (talking about the users inside the application). It does look like my library had to be rescanned. Not sure it's the "fault" of the container or the application. It's a beta product after all. Attaching the file structure as requested just in case. Quote Link to comment
binhex Posted February 21, 2019 Author Share Posted February 21, 2019 3 minutes ago, MickeyJello said: The user was named differently previously, but it was easy to just rename it again (talking about the users inside the application). ok so the folder /config/metadata didnt get moved, not sure where this should go, whether it should be moved to /config/data/metadata or /config/config/metadata but i think thats the cause of the username reverting back, as i can see within metadata their is a folder called "People" which im assuming contains users, as you have already renamed yours back i dont think you need to worry about this, and can simply delete the metadata folder if you wish. the /config/transcoding-temp folder is a temp folder, so again that can now be deleted, not worried about moving that over, other than that it looks clean. 8 minutes ago, MickeyJello said: It does look like my library had to be rescanned. Not sure it's the "fault" of the container or the application hmm not sure about this, perhaps it always does a rescan on startup?, or perhaps jellyfin didnt shutdown gracefully and thus does a rescan to check for corruption, who knows!, keep an eye on it. Quote Link to comment
MickeyJello Posted February 21, 2019 Share Posted February 21, 2019 Yep. It was the missing metadata folder. I moved it into /config/data/metadata, restarted and everything looks good now. The People folder is for Actors, Directors, etc. It looks like the user data was stored in /config/config/users but have now been moved to an actual db? (/config/data/data/users.db) Not too sure on that one, but like I said it was trivial to correct. Quote Link to comment
binhex Posted February 21, 2019 Author Share Posted February 21, 2019 2 minutes ago, MickeyJello said: I moved it into /config/data/metadata, restarted and everything looks good now. The People folder is for Actors, Directors, etc. just to double check is that path /config/data/metadata or /config/data/data/metadata? and did you delete the existing folder prior to the move? Quote Link to comment
MickeyJello Posted February 21, 2019 Share Posted February 21, 2019 12 minutes ago, binhex said: just to double check is that path /config/data/metadata or /config/data/data/metadata? and did you delete the existing folder prior to the move? /config/data/metadata did the trick for me. I did not delete anything. 1 Quote Link to comment
darckhart Posted February 24, 2019 Share Posted February 24, 2019 hi there, thanks for the hard work! just installed today. not sure if it's JF's problem or not, but trying to disable "remote connections" will bork the whole thing, ie, cannot access JF even on lan at this point. (dashboard, settings, advanced, uncheck "allow remote connections") Quote Link to comment
binhex Posted February 25, 2019 Author Share Posted February 25, 2019 20 hours ago, darckhart said: not sure if it's JF's problem or not, but trying to disable "remote connections" will bork the whole thing, ie, cannot access JF even on lan at this point. thats because 'remote connections' is anything outside of the containers network, as in nothing other than processes running in the container, in a traditional install of this on a phy box disabling remote connections would mean you could still get to jellyfin on loopback as its using the hosts network stack, so its not really a bug per say, just its not an option with docker in mind, now im sure you wont do it again right 🙂 Quote Link to comment
darckhart Posted February 26, 2019 Share Posted February 26, 2019 yea I figured it would be a box in a box in a box issue. Quote Link to comment
xhaloz Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 So I am trying to setup reverse proxy with this. I can access the docker on LAN via the reverse proxy address. However, if I try to access that same link on WAN, I get "Forbidden". To do some testing, I want to enable https via the default port. However when I manually add it to the docker it does not resolve via HTTPS://LOCALIP:8920 Any ideas? Further why wasn't the HTTPS: port included? Any particular reason? Thanks Binhex! Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.