kgregg Posted February 5, 2019 Share Posted February 5, 2019 a good read. hope they get back online soon. Quote Link to comment
CrashnBrn Posted February 5, 2019 Share Posted February 5, 2019 I wonder why they aren't running in AWS or any other cloud provider. Quote Link to comment
kgregg Posted February 5, 2019 Author Share Posted February 5, 2019 cost seems to be primary factor Quote Link to comment
CrashnBrn Posted February 8, 2019 Share Posted February 8, 2019 On 2/5/2019 at 2:32 PM, kgregg said: cost seems to be primary factor Running AWS would have been cheaper than their current repair and recovery costs. Also cheaper and faster to scale. Quote Link to comment
NewDisplayName Posted February 23, 2019 Share Posted February 23, 2019 (edited) Im playin with the thought about hosting via google drive. Just upload files bigger then X to cloud and combine them with the small files used. I wonder how much of a performance decrease it would be. I had this dream since i startet using google drive for media. (there its like 5 sec delay) Edited February 23, 2019 by nuhll Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.