Whiskerz Posted May 10, 2019 Share Posted May 10, 2019 (edited) redacted Edited May 4, 2022 by Whiskerz 1 Quote Link to comment
JorgeB Posted May 10, 2019 Share Posted May 10, 2019 Don't see any issues with SMART health, but this could be a problem: Formatted with type 2 protection More info here: http://talesinit.blogspot.com/2015/11/formatted-with-type-2-protection-huh.html Quote Link to comment
JorgeB Posted May 12, 2019 Share Posted May 12, 2019 Looks fine to me, likely some Unraid bug relating to SAS drives, and without the type 2 protection they should be usable now. Quote Link to comment
JorgeB Posted May 12, 2019 Share Posted May 12, 2019 The SMART test aren't failing, the ones complete did so without error, maybe an issue on how Unraid retrieves the info: # 1 Background short Self test in progress ... - NOW - [- - -] # 2 Background short Completed - 174 - [- - -] # 3 Background short Completed - 155 - [- - -] # 4 Background short Completed - 51 - [- - -] # 5 Background long Completed - 29 - [- - -] # 6 Background short Completed - 22 - [- - -] # 7 Background short Completed - 0 - [- - -] # 8 Background short Completed - 0 - [- - -] # 9 Background short Completed - 0 - [- - -] Quote Link to comment
bonienl Posted May 12, 2019 Share Posted May 12, 2019 The SMART output of SAS devices is different from SATA devices. This isn't taken into consideration for the SMART self tests in the GUI. Quote Link to comment
zwolfinger Posted May 2, 2020 Share Posted May 2, 2020 On 5/12/2019 at 5:37 AM, bonienl said: The SMART output of SAS devices is different from SATA devices. This isn't taken into consideration for the SMART self tests in the GUI. Sorry to dig up an old topic - but what would it take to move support for SAS SMART reports up the priority list? Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.