sonofdbn Posted August 11, 2019 Share Posted August 11, 2019 1 hour ago, StevenD said: You could go to 6.6.6. Surprisingly, that was a really good release. That would be the "better the devil you know" approach? Quote Link to comment
Dazog Posted August 25, 2019 Share Posted August 25, 2019 (edited) Will we see a 6.7.3 with updated kernel before 6.8 series starts? Since the 6.7 series will be used by some people for a time after 6.8 releases and while it's being tested. @limetech Edited August 25, 2019 by Dazog 1 Quote Link to comment
WingmanNZ Posted August 26, 2019 Share Posted August 26, 2019 (edited) Looks like 6.8.0 RC's are not far away The new remote access management plugin appears to be live and testing internally as it requires `6.8.0-rc0p` https://raw.githubusercontent.com/limetech/Unraid.net/master/Unraid.net.plg <?xml version='1.0' standalone='yes'?> <!DOCTYPE PLUGIN [ <!ENTITY name "Unraid.net"> <!ENTITY launch "Settings/ManagementAccess"> <!ENTITY author "limetech"> <!ENTITY version "2019.03.07a"> <!ENTITY pluginURL "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/limetech/&name;/master/&name;.plg"> ]> <PLUGIN name="&name;" author="&author;" version="&version;" launch="&launch;" min="6.8.0-rc0p"> Edited August 26, 2019 by WingmanNZ 1 Quote Link to comment
eXtremeSHOK Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 Hopefully a verison 5.x kernel This will allow for swap on BTFS partitions. Quote Link to comment
starbetrayer Posted September 4, 2019 Share Posted September 4, 2019 On 8/26/2019 at 5:42 PM, WingmanNZ said: Looks like 6.8.0 RC's are not far away The new remote access management plugin appears to be live and testing internally as it requires `6.8.0-rc0p` https://raw.githubusercontent.com/limetech/Unraid.net/master/Unraid.net.plg <?xml version='1.0' standalone='yes'?> <!DOCTYPE PLUGIN [ <!ENTITY name "Unraid.net"> <!ENTITY launch "Settings/ManagementAccess"> <!ENTITY author "limetech"> <!ENTITY version "2019.03.07a"> <!ENTITY pluginURL "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/limetech/&name;/master/&name;.plg"> ]> <PLUGIN name="&name;" author="&author;" version="&version;" launch="&launch;" min="6.8.0-rc0p"> <PLUGIN name="&name;" author="&author;" version="&version;" pluginURL="&pluginURL;" launch="&launch;" support="https://forums.unraid.net" min="6.8.0-rc0q"> 🙂 Quote Link to comment
HNGamingUK Posted September 5, 2019 Share Posted September 5, 2019 On 9/4/2019 at 3:02 PM, starbetrayer said: <PLUGIN name="&name;" author="&author;" version="&version;" pluginURL="&pluginURL;" launch="&launch;" support="https://forums.unraid.net" min="6.8.0-rc0q"> 🙂 Yup in the change logs for a few plugins now I have seen mentions to 6.8. From seeing a feature requests looks like 6.8 will have a proper login page as well. Quote Link to comment
takkkkkkk Posted September 6, 2019 Share Posted September 6, 2019 On 8/26/2019 at 6:42 PM, WingmanNZ said: Looks like 6.8.0 RC's are not far away The new remote access management plugin appears to be live and testing internally as it requires `6.8.0-rc0p` https://raw.githubusercontent.com/limetech/Unraid.net/master/Unraid.net.plg <?xml version='1.0' standalone='yes'?> <!DOCTYPE PLUGIN [ <!ENTITY name "Unraid.net"> <!ENTITY launch "Settings/ManagementAccess"> <!ENTITY author "limetech"> <!ENTITY version "2019.03.07a"> <!ENTITY pluginURL "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/limetech/&name;/master/&name;.plg"> ]> <PLUGIN name="&name;" author="&author;" version="&version;" launch="&launch;" min="6.8.0-rc0p"> I really hope it's the true remote/offsite management. I hate having to turnon VM on my work machine, just so that I can use openvpn to remotely manage unraid Quote Link to comment
Matzz786 Posted September 9, 2019 Share Posted September 9, 2019 (edited) Hi all, New to unraid. I have been unable to edit XML for VMs on version 6.7.2 The toggle 'Form Mode' option isn't working and right click on the VM doesn't display the 'Edit XML' option. *Edit: Was a Chrome browser issue, working fine with Firefox :(* Halp please. TIA Edited September 9, 2019 by Matzz786 Quote Link to comment
pro9c3 Posted September 14, 2019 Share Posted September 14, 2019 will we ever get in-place encryption for pre-existing xfs disks? Like, without having to go through spaceinvader's steps to do so. Quote Link to comment
takkkkkkk Posted September 26, 2019 Share Posted September 26, 2019 Is it just me or the development seems to have slowed down? Quote Link to comment
starbetrayer Posted September 28, 2019 Share Posted September 28, 2019 On 9/25/2019 at 7:53 PM, takkkkkkk said: Is it just me or the development seems to have slowed down? On 9/25/2019 at 8:26 PM, BRiT said: It's just you. It is just you. <PLUGIN name="&name;" author="&author;" version="&version;" pluginURL="&pluginURL;" launch="&launch;" support="https://forums.unraid.net" min="6.8.0-rc0w"> 6.8.0-rc0w That's a lot of releases for development. I am betting that the 6.8.0 is close by now. Quote Link to comment
Dazog Posted September 28, 2019 Share Posted September 28, 2019 (edited) 57 minutes ago, starbetrayer said: It is just you. <PLUGIN name="&name;" author="&author;" version="&version;" pluginURL="&pluginURL;" launch="&launch;" support="https://forums.unraid.net" min="6.8.0-rc0w"> 6.8.0-rc0w That's a lot of releases for development. I am betting that the 6.8.0 is close by now. They haven't hit the next milestone 6.8.0-rcn0sy Edited September 28, 2019 by Dazog 1 Quote Link to comment
joelones Posted October 11, 2019 Share Posted October 11, 2019 (edited) Just tried to upgrade tpo 6.7.2 and I'm experiencing hard random crashes (system unresponsive & always within first 5minutes of boot) and tried to tail the syslog to catch culprit, to no avail. Running the libreELEC dvb build along with two VMs (passing in a quad card NIC to pfsense). I tried setting "PCIe ACS override: to both" from Downstream, previous setting on 6.5.3 was set to "Yes". Has been rock stable on 6.5.3. I'm running an old AMD FX8320 cpu and ASRock 970 EXTREME4 motherboard. No further BIOS updates for this mobo since 2015. This is my append: append vfio-pci.ids=1b73:1100 pcie_acs_override=downstream initrd=/bzroot The pci.ids correspond to the NIC, and I've also got a WinTV HVR-1600, card which I'm not passing through. Any thoughts here? Wait for v5 of the kernel or end of life for this mobo/cpu? Edited October 11, 2019 by joelones Quote Link to comment
Squid Posted October 11, 2019 Share Posted October 11, 2019 First thing to do is run a memtest for a few passes Quote Link to comment
joelones Posted October 11, 2019 Share Posted October 11, 2019 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Squid said: First thing to do is run a memtest for a few passes Memtest on an already stable system with older kernel? I've been on 6.5.3 for years without issues and reverted back and it's stable. Edited October 11, 2019 by joelones Quote Link to comment
Squid Posted October 11, 2019 Share Posted October 11, 2019 Memory can and does go bad, and everyone should run a pass every few months. Different kernels can utilize memory differently. A memtest is pretty much always the first thing to do in this kind of issue, if only to rule it out. 1 Quote Link to comment
talkto_menow Posted October 19, 2019 Share Posted October 19, 2019 Upgraded from 6.5.2 to 6.7.2. OS loaded and everything seemed fine until I played something through Kodi on my HTPC. Videos played for about 10 seconds and stopped. I tried multiple videos with the same results. I played through Plex on XBOX One and there were no issues. I checked on another PC. Tower was not longer visible under Network, however I was able to browse shares when I specified IP address. Rebooting Tower, HTPC and PC did not solve the problem. I had to revert to 6.5.2 and network issues disappeared. Quote Link to comment
jpowell8672 Posted October 19, 2019 Share Posted October 19, 2019 11 minutes ago, talkto_menow said: Upgraded from 6.5.2 to 6.7.2. OS loaded and everything seemed fine until I played something through Kodi on my HTPC. Videos played for about 10 seconds and stopped. I tried multiple videos with the same results. I played through Plex on XBOX One and there were no issues. I checked on another PC. Tower was not longer visible under Network, however I was able to browse shares when I specified IP address. Rebooting Tower, HTPC and PC did not solve the problem. I had to revert to 6.5.2 and network issues disappeared. This is a known issue and is fixed in the new 6.8.0rc's Quote Link to comment
jonnyodt Posted October 29, 2019 Share Posted October 29, 2019 Hi @all! Is this Wake on LAN issue fixed in 6.8 too? https://forums.unraid.net/topic/80008-wol-not-working-in-67/page/2/ I can not use 6.7.2 because WOL doesn't work. in 6.6.7 everything is fine. Quote Link to comment
dalmaar Posted November 4, 2019 Share Posted November 4, 2019 Having an Issue upgrading from 6.6.1 to 6.71. or 6.7.2. Using the tools>update OS, after selecting upgrade to 6.7.1 I get the following on popup log plugin: updating: unRAIDServer.plg plugin: downloading: https://s3.amazonaws.com/dnld.lime-technology.com/stable/unRAIDServer-6.7.2-x86_64.zip ... done plugin: downloading: https://s3.amazonaws.com/dnld.lime-technology.com/stable/unRAIDServer-6.7.2-x86_64.md5 ... done Archive: /tmp/unRAIDServer.zip creating: /tmp/unRAIDServer/EFI-/ creating: /tmp/unRAIDServer/EFI-/boot/ inflating: /tmp/unRAIDServer/EFI-/boot/bootx64.efi inflating: /tmp/unRAIDServer/EFI-/boot/ldlinux.e64 inflating: /tmp/unRAIDServer/EFI-/boot/libcom32.c32 inflating: /tmp/unRAIDServer/EFI-/boot/libutil.c32 inflating: /tmp/unRAIDServer/EFI-/boot/mboot.c32 inflating: /tmp/unRAIDServer/EFI-/boot/menu.c32 inflating: /tmp/unRAIDServer/EFI-/boot/syslinux.cfg inflating: /tmp/unRAIDServer/bzfirmware inflating: /tmp/unRAIDServer/bzfirmware.sha256 inflating: /tmp/unRAIDServer/bzimage inflating: /tmp/unRAIDServer/bzimage.sha256 inflating: /tmp/unRAIDServer/bzmodules inflating: /tmp/unRAIDServer/bzmodules.sha256 inflating: /tmp/unRAIDServer/bzroot inflating: /tmp/unRAIDServer/bzroot-gui unzip error 0 plugin: run failed: /bin/bash retval: 1 It seems to have an error? and exits without upgrading, tried a clean reboot. Nothing in sys log, via GUI Log (no highlighted text). After reboot all seems ok., I assuming nothing was changed. I must be missing something? Any help appreciated. Dalmaar Quote Link to comment
dalmaar Posted November 5, 2019 Share Posted November 5, 2019 Appears my very first old dual core raid box is finally showing it's age, It only has 2G memory and is not enough to uncompress the upgrade to 6.7.2, rootfs runs out of space. I think I have 2 2G sticks in a junk box some place, or I can attempt a manual install on the flash drive, probably just put in the memory. I will post results, if anybody runs into similar issue, probably not many folks running an Unraid with 2G. Dalmaar Quote Link to comment
dalmaar Posted November 8, 2019 Share Posted November 8, 2019 All, Follow up post, after upgrading to 4G all is well, clean upgrade. Dalmaar Quote Link to comment
joelones Posted November 13, 2019 Share Posted November 13, 2019 On 10/11/2019 at 10:56 AM, Squid said: Memory can and does go bad, and everyone should run a pass every few months. Different kernels can utilize memory differently. A memtest is pretty much always the first thing to do in this kind of issue, if only to rule it out. I did a memtest and also swapped the dimms with 4 known working ones, same issue. Further info: Quote Link to comment
kleptonite Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 I have upgraded from 6.5.0 to 6.7.2, but when I try to load the webgui (https://192.168.1.10/Main) all I get is the header graphic and nothing else except the following line at the bottom of the screen: Array Stopped• Dynamix webGui vplugin: xml parse error I can see the Flash drive through WIn File Explorer and also I can login to Unraid via putty. I saw no errors during the upgrade process. I have a backup of 6.5.0 from the flash drive and I did a diagnostic before the upgrade. Is it possible to create a diagnostic via putty? Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.