Konijntjes Posted September 23, 2019 Share Posted September 23, 2019 (edited) Should I be worried about speed of the disk checks Total size:3 TB Elapsed time:56 minutes Current position:227 GB (7.6 %) Estimated speed:67.0 MB/sec Estimated finish:11 hours, 29 minutes System specs Supermicro - X9SRL-F Intel e5-1650 v2 64 gb ram ecc HP H220 - Broadcom / LSI SAS2308 PCI-Express Fusion-MPT SAS-2 (rev 05) Intel dc3700 400gb (cache) USB [0:0:0:0] disk Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 1.00 /dev/sda 15.4GB Harddrives [8:0:0:0] disk ATA WDC WD3009FYPX-0 1D01 /dev/sdb 3.00TB [8:0:1:0] disk ATA ST33000650NS 0004 /dev/sdc 3.00TB [8:0:2:0] disk ATA WDC WD3009FYPX-0 1D01 /dev/sdd 3.00TB [8:0:3:0] disk ATA WDC WD3009FYPX-0 1D01 /dev/sde 3.00TB [8:0:4:0] disk ATA WDC WD3009FYPX-0 1D01 /dev/sdf 3.00TB [8:0:5:0] disk ATA WDC WD3009FYPX-0 1D01 /dev/sdg 3.00TB [8:0:6:0] disk ATA ST33000650NS 0004 /dev/sdh 3.00TB [8:0:7:0] disk ATA WDC WD3009FYPX-0 1D01 /dev/sdi 3.00TB [8:0:8:0] disk ATA ST33000650NS 0004 /dev/sdj 3.00TB [8:0:9:0] disk ATA WDC WD3009FYPX-0 1D01 /dev/sdk 3.00TB [8:0:10:0] disk ATA ST33000650NS 0004 /dev/sdl 3.00TB [8:0:11:0] disk ATA WDC WD3009FYPX-0 1D01 /dev/sdm 3.00TB [8:0:12:0] disk ATA ST33000650NS 0004 /dev/sdn 3.00TB [8:0:13:0] disk ATA ST33000650NS 0004 /dev/sdo 3.00TB [8:0:14:0] disk ATA ST33000650NS 0004 /dev/sdp 3.00TB [8:0:15:0] disk ATA ST33000650NS 0004 /dev/sdq 3.00TB [8:0:16:0] disk ATA WDC WD30EFRX-68E 0A82 /dev/sdr 3.00TB [8:0:17:0] disk ATA ST3000DM001-1CH1 CC44 /dev/sds 3.00TB [8:0:18:0] disk ATA WDC WD30EFRX-68E 0A82 /dev/sdt 3.00TB [8:0:19:0] disk ATA WDC WD30EFRX-68E 0A82 /dev/sdu 3.00TB [8:0:20:0] disk ATA WDC WD30EFRX-68E 0A82 /dev/sdv 3.00TB [8:0:21:0] disk ATA WDC WD30EFRX-68E 0A82 /dev/sdw 3.00TB [8:0:22:0] disk ATA WDC WD30EFRX-68E 0A82 /dev/sdx 3.00TB [8:0:23:0] disk ATA WDC WD30EFRX-68E 0A82 /dev/sdy 3.00TB Cache [N:0:0:1] disk INTEL SSDPEDMD400G4__1 /dev/nvme0n1 400GB unraid-diagnostics-20190923-1159.zip Edited September 29, 2019 by Konijntjes Quote Link to comment
Konijntjes Posted September 23, 2019 Author Share Posted September 23, 2019 Something is "wrong" and its climbing fast. Total size:3 TB Elapsed time:1 hour, 5 minutes Current position:260 GB (8.7 %) Estimated speed:38.2 MB/sec Estimated finish:19 hours, 56 minutes Sync errors corrected:488247 Quote Link to comment
JorgeB Posted September 23, 2019 Share Posted September 23, 2019 19 minutes ago, Konijntjes said: Estimated speed:67.0 MB/sec Try de tunables tester scrip, default tunables are not very good for larger arrays, also note that if you're using a single link between the HBA and the expander max speed will be around 90MB/s, usu dual link if possible. 12 minutes ago, Konijntjes said: Sync errors corrected:488247 These usually mean parity is not in sync, unless you're getting disk errors, is this 1st parity check? Quote Link to comment
Konijntjes Posted September 23, 2019 Author Share Posted September 23, 2019 1 hour ago, johnnie.black said: Try de tunables tester scrip, default tunables are not very good for larger arrays, also note that if you're using a single link between the HBA and the expander max speed will be around 90MB/s, usu dual link if possible. Dont know if the BPN-SAS2-846EL1 of my SuperMicro can handle 2 sas connections. 1 hour ago, johnnie.black said: These usually mean parity is not in sync, unless you're getting disk errors, is this 1st parity check? Yes this is the first parity check Quote Link to comment
JorgeB Posted September 23, 2019 Share Posted September 23, 2019 1 hour ago, Konijntjes said: Dont know if the BPN-SAS2-846EL1 of my SuperMicro can handle 2 sas connections. It can, supports dual link. 1 hour ago, Konijntjes said: Yes this is the first parity check Then likely parity wasn't in sync. Quote Link to comment
Konijntjes Posted September 23, 2019 Author Share Posted September 23, 2019 (edited) On 9/23/2019 at 5:04 PM, johnnie.black said: It can, supports dual link. Then likely parity wasn't in sync. Thanks for the help but the server is on hold at the moment. Most likely i killed the motherboard. Or it killed it self IPMI seems dead same as vga but it boots to unraid. Edited September 24, 2019 by Konijntjes Quote Link to comment
Konijntjes Posted September 24, 2019 Author Share Posted September 24, 2019 On 9/23/2019 at 5:04 PM, johnnie.black said: It can, supports dual link. Then likely parity wasn't in sync. Of the 2 connections there are on the backplane witch do i need to use. The manual isnt that clear about it ( still waiting on the 2e cable ) Quote Link to comment
JorgeB Posted September 24, 2019 Share Posted September 24, 2019 Supermicro recommends J1 and J2, though it will likely work with either 2 of the 3 ports. Quote Link to comment
Konijntjes Posted September 27, 2019 Author Share Posted September 27, 2019 On 9/24/2019 at 8:30 PM, johnnie.black said: Supermicro recommends J1 and J2, though it will likely work with either 2 of the 3 ports. Thanks. The parity check is much faster. Total size:3 TB Elapsed time:38 minutes Current position:221 GB (7.4 %) Estimated speed:98.1 MB/sec Estimated finish:7 hours, 52 minutes unraid-diagnostics-20190927-2336.zip Quote Link to comment
Konijntjes Posted September 29, 2019 Author Share Posted September 29, 2019 Thanks to johnnie.black is the performance up to 130 mb/s parity. Marking this topic as solved. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.