December 19, 20196 yr Hey, Using unraid 6.8.0. I was testing out using the trial for the past week or so, and purchased a license. I had to stop the array to register the key, and when I started it again, the 2 most recent disks I'd added show as unmountable. While there wasn't much data on them, I'd like to understand what happened as I'd hate to have the same thing happen in the future. If possible I'd like to recover the data. Config: 1 parity 3TB drives 3 data 3TB drives, disk1 (sdd), 2 (sdg), and 3 (sdj). 1 cache 500gb ssd drive When I start the array, disk2 and disk3 show as unmountable: unsupported partition layout. I am able to mount both disks from and the command line and see the data on them. SFDisk from the affected drives: root@unraid:/var/log# sfdisk /dev/sdg Welcome to sfdisk (util-linux 2.34). Changes will remain in memory only, until you decide to write them. Be careful before using the write command. Checking that no-one is using this disk right now ... OK Disk /dev/sdg: 2.75 TiB, 3000592982016 bytes, 5860533168 sectors Disk model: HUS723030ALS640 Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disklabel type: gpt Disk identifier: DF4CDD53-D0F9-449E-BC37-E441CF8C860A Old situation: Device Start End Sectors Size Type /dev/sdg1 64 5860533134 5860533071 2.7T Linux filesystem Type 'help' to get more information. >>> root@unraid:/var/log# sfdisk /dev/sdj Welcome to sfdisk (util-linux 2.34). Changes will remain in memory only, until you decide to write them. Be careful before using the write command. Checking that no-one is using this disk right now ... OK Disk /dev/sdj: 2.75 TiB, 3000592982016 bytes, 5860533168 sectors Disk model: HUS723030ALS640 Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disklabel type: gpt Disk identifier: D61A55FA-160C-4DD3-A586-564B764EEA88 Old situation: Device Start End Sectors Size Type /dev/sdj1 64 5860533134 5860533071 2.7T Linux filesystem Type 'help' to get more information. >>> System info: Model: Custom M/B: Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+ Version REV:1.20A - s/n: NM138S000912 BIOS: American Megatrends Inc. Version 3.0. Dated: 07/05/2013 CPU: Intel® Xeon® CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz HVM: Enabled IOMMU: Enabled Cache: 384 KiB, 1536 KiB, 15360 KiB, 384 KiB, 1536 KiB, 15360 KiB Memory: 128 GiB DDR3 Multi-bit ECC (max. installable capacity 384 GiB) Network: bond0: fault-tolerance (active-backup), mtu 1500 eth0: interface down eth1: interface down eth2: 1000 Mbps, full duplex, mtu 1500 eth3: 1000 Mbps, full duplex, mtu 1500 eth4: interface down eth5: interface down eth6: interface down eth7: interface down Kernel: Linux 4.19.88-Unraid x86_64 OpenSSL: 1.1.1d Uptime: These are both connected to a SAS backplane in a supermicro SC847. I've attached the diagnostic report. Thanks, KS unraid-diagnostics-20191219-0912.zip Edited December 19, 20196 yr by ksagle
December 19, 20196 yr Community Expert You are likely using SAS multipath, Unraid is seeing each disk twice: Dec 19 06:09:07 unraid emhttpd: device /dev/sdj problem getting id Dec 19 06:09:07 unraid emhttpd: device /dev/sdk problem getting id Dec 19 06:09:07 unraid emhttpd: Device inventory: Dec 19 06:09:07 unraid emhttpd: HUS723030ALS640_YVJNKHNK_35000cca03e962090 (sdh) 512 5860533168 Dec 19 06:09:07 unraid emhttpd: HUS723030ALS640_YVJNKX4K_35000cca03e96269c (sdg) 512 5860533168 Dec 19 06:09:07 unraid emhttpd: HUS723030ALS640_YVJP3ERK_35000cca03e971ee4 (sdd) 512 5860533168 Dec 19 06:09:07 unraid emhttpd: device /dev/sde problem getting id Dec 19 06:09:07 unraid emhttpd: Kingston_DataTraveler_3.0_60A44C3FACC9E1B109990049-0:0 (sdb) 512 60632064 Dec 19 06:09:07 unraid emhttpd: HUS723030ALS640_YVJNZXLK_35000cca03e96ea08 (sdf) 512 5860533168 Dec 19 06:09:07 unraid emhttpd: CT500BX100SSD1_1511F00431A3 (sdc) 512 976773168 Dec 19 06:09:07 unraid emhttpd: device /dev/sdi problem getting id You need to disabled that as it's not supported by Unraid.
December 19, 20196 yr Author Hey Johnnie, Interesting, I didn't think my mobo supported multipath. I disabled it and rebooted and the drives mounted successfully. Thanks for the help.
December 19, 20196 yr Community Expert It's not the mobo, it's the backplane, it should be the dual expander model and you have one cable connected to each, like so: Correct way is a single cable to expander A (single link) or both cables to expander A (dual link)
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.