alturismo Posted March 7, 2020 Share Posted March 7, 2020 23 minutes ago, bonienl said: Your screenshots show some plugins and/or scripts getting invoked at startup. First thing to do is to start in safe mode and retest. thanks for taking a look, when i look at the screens i rather may would say it was either the power down ( cause version 682) or the update did fail cause it was still at v682, nevermind, as mentioned the powerdown and startup then went fine and all is running on v683 now. btw, thanks for adding the docker network override feature from the "wishlist" Quote Link to comment
Harro Posted March 7, 2020 Share Posted March 7, 2020 (edited) Updated both servers without any problems from 6.8.2. Thank you all for your continued hard work on improving Unraid. Edited March 7, 2020 by Harro typo 1 Quote Link to comment
cobhc Posted March 7, 2020 Share Posted March 7, 2020 12 hours ago, limetech said: Yes we are preparing a 6.9 beta release with 5.5.8 kernel, and then move to 5.6 kernel ultimately. Really looking forward to this. Updated from 6.8.2 without issue. 1 Quote Link to comment
bastl Posted March 7, 2020 Share Posted March 7, 2020 Update from 6.8.2 went fine so far. Unraid is back up runing with all VMs and Dockers. Small thing i noticed is by opening the "system logs" under tools the orange animated loading stripes showed up for split second and dissappeared. Not happened before and doesn't look like it has any impact. Maybe only a small glitch. Something that I already reported in the 6.8.2 release thread is some warning for my Intel nics during Unraid boot Mar 7 14:14:16 UNRAID kernel: igb 0000:04:00.0 eth1: mixed HW and IP checksum settings. Mar 7 14:14:16 UNRAID kernel: igb 0000:06:00.0 eth2: mixed HW and IP checksum settings. . . Mar 7 14:14:16 UNRAID kernel: igb 0000:04:00.0 eth0: mixed HW and IP checksum settings. Mar 7 14:14:16 UNRAID kernel: igb 0000:04:00.0 eth0: mixed HW and IP checksum settings. . Not sure how to interpret this warning. Looks like network has no issues so far. And another warning that still comes up since 6.8.2 is the following: Mar 7 14:27:13 UNRAID inotifywait[7814]: Failed to watch /mnt/disk2; upper limit on inotify watches reached! Mar 7 14:27:13 UNRAID inotifywait[7814]: Please increase the amount of inotify watches allowed per user via `/proc/sys/fs/inotify/max_user_watches'. Smart values for the disk are ok. If someone is able to help me to understand these warnings please feel free to explain it. Thanks! old post for 6.8.2 with logs: Quote Link to comment
Squid Posted March 7, 2020 Share Posted March 7, 2020 3 minutes ago, bastl said: Mar 7 14:27:13 UNRAID inotifywait[7814]: Please increase the amount of inotify watches allowed per user via `/proc/sys/fs/inotify/max_user_watches'. You can adjust the watches via the tips & tweaks plugin (You've got a plugin or something else that is actively watching for changes on the drives) Quote Link to comment
bastl Posted March 7, 2020 Share Posted March 7, 2020 1 minute ago, Squid said: You can adjust the watches via the tips & tweaks plugin Thanks for the hint. It's currently set to the default of 524288. Can you explain what this setting is for and maybe why only disk 2 shows these warnings? Quote Link to comment
Squid Posted March 7, 2020 Share Posted March 7, 2020 It's a maximum memory value for the data required to monitor files / folders for changes (ie: Dynamix File Integrity, et al) Just increase it (double it?) Quote Link to comment
bastl Posted March 7, 2020 Share Posted March 7, 2020 @Squid After reading the inotify man page I doubled it to 1048576 (1G). Let's see if the warning is gone. Quote Link to comment
alitchy Posted March 7, 2020 Share Posted March 7, 2020 13 hours ago, Xcelsior86 said: How exactly do we setup this new container VPN feature? Is the feature a way to create a VPN client connection and have any container route through that connection? Any feedback on this question? I'm currently using binhex's deluge-privoxy container to route other containers through a VPN. It works, but it is kind of fragile, it would be great if there was a better supported mechanism to accomplish this setup. Quote Link to comment
Squid Posted March 7, 2020 Share Posted March 7, 2020 17 minutes ago, alitchy said: Any feedback on this question? I'm currently using binhex's deluge-privoxy container to route other containers through a VPN. It works, but it is kind of fragile, it would be great if there was a better supported mechanism to accomplish this setup. 5 hours ago, bonienl said: See this Quote Link to comment
ramblinreck47 Posted March 7, 2020 Share Posted March 7, 2020 Updated from 6.8.2 to 6.8.3 without issue. 1 Quote Link to comment
syniex Posted March 7, 2020 Share Posted March 7, 2020 Upgrade went smooth. but i did notice high cpu usage 10-20% on idle (only dockers running) using top i saw unraidd3 i saw using 9-10% and shft 9-10%. attaching diagnostics unraid-diagnostics-20200307-1757.zip Quote Link to comment
John_M Posted March 7, 2020 Share Posted March 7, 2020 Uneventful update from 6.8.2. Thank you. The Dynamix File Integrity plugin is still not Unraid 6.8 compatible (it tries and fails to run its scheduled check directly from the boot flash). I know it isn't the fault of this specific release and it has been mentioned in the support thread for that plugin but it still remains broken. Quote Link to comment
pluginCop Posted March 7, 2020 Share Posted March 7, 2020 16 minutes ago, John_M said: Uneventful update from 6.8.2. Thank you. The Dynamix File Integrity plugin is still not Unraid 6.8 compatible (it tries and fails to run its scheduled check directly from the boot flash). I know it isn't the fault of this specific release and it has been mentioned in the support thread for that plugin but it still remains broken. Yeah, there is a comment within Apps regarding that. If the plugin wasn't still functional in other respects, it would have been blacklisted from Apps completely. But, IMHO background checking of the files is a very important aspect of the plugin and this should be fixed asap. Quote Link to comment
bonienl Posted March 7, 2020 Share Posted March 7, 2020 15 minutes ago, John_M said: Uneventful update from 6.8.2. Thank you. The Dynamix File Integrity plugin is still not Unraid 6.8 compatible (it tries and fails to run its scheduled check directly from the boot flash). I know it isn't the fault of this specific release and it has been mentioned in the support thread for that plugin but it still remains broken. I I guess, I have some work to do tomorrow, when I have some spare time... 2 Quote Link to comment
optiman Posted March 7, 2020 Share Posted March 7, 2020 (edited) Can you please confirm if you included the new ASPEED drivers in this update? Supermicro came back and said I now need to update the ASPEED drivers inside Unraid before we can update the BMC fw. Here is the link to the new drivers, https://www.supermicro.com/wftp/driver/VGA/ASPEED/ASPEED.zip Would be great if these new drivers were added to Unraid. I posted this in the Feature Request thread. I'm told that after I do this, my video output will be restored when running the new BMC fw. I forgot to mention that Support had me roll back the BMC fw to 1.48 and the video is once again working normal. The ASPEED drivers upgrade and the BMC fw to the latest contains Security fixes. Thank you! Edited March 7, 2020 by Switchblade 1 Quote Link to comment
JoeUnraidUser Posted March 7, 2020 Share Posted March 7, 2020 My upgrade went well. Just incase something goes wrong; don't forget to backup your flash drive before upgrading. 1 Quote Link to comment
highdefinitely Posted March 7, 2020 Share Posted March 7, 2020 Updated two servers from 6.8.2 without an issue whatsoever, as almost expected these days. Thanks for the great job unRAID team! I expect more headaches once we move to the new Linux Kernel, but for now, things run smoothly. 1 Quote Link to comment
Marv Posted March 7, 2020 Share Posted March 7, 2020 Upgade went without any issue for me and everyhing is working as expected. But I noticed that my server needs much more time to boot now. Is there anything in the changelog that can explain this? Quote Link to comment
rcmpayne Posted March 7, 2020 Share Posted March 7, 2020 What do we mean by "Add docker container VPN network support." I'm running openvpn as on a docker so this seems intriguing to me but I'm not really sure what it means. Quote Link to comment
limetech Posted March 7, 2020 Author Share Posted March 7, 2020 3 minutes ago, rcmpayne said: What do we mean by "Add docker container VPN network support." I'm running openvpn as on a docker so this seems intriguing to me but I'm not really sure what it means. This question has been answered I think x3 in this topic. 1 Quote Link to comment
limetech Posted March 7, 2020 Author Share Posted March 7, 2020 1 hour ago, Switchblade said: Can you please confirm if you included the new ASPEED drivers in this update? No sorry, will get into next release (if they build correctly). 1 hour ago, Switchblade said: Would be great if these new drivers were added to Unraid. I posted this in the Feature Request thread. Would be great if S/M would just merge them in-tree. 1 Quote Link to comment
rcmpayne Posted March 7, 2020 Share Posted March 7, 2020 This question has been answered I think x3 in this topic.I just read through all the post again, I'm sorry I don't see it. I see one link to an external page but it's way over my head. I see multiple people asking what this is and I'm not seeing any responses to it. maybe I'm blindSent from my SM-N970U1 using Tapatalk Quote Link to comment
Marshalleq Posted March 7, 2020 Share Posted March 7, 2020 2 hours ago, Switchblade said: Can you please confirm if you included the new ASPEED drivers in this update? Supermicro came back and said I now need to update the ASPEED drivers inside Unraid before we can update the BMC fw. Here is the link to the new drivers, https://www.supermicro.com/wftp/driver/VGA/ASPEED/ASPEED.zip If I'm reading correctly and you just need firmware updated, it may be possible to boot from something other than unraid to do that... Quote Link to comment
wgstarks Posted March 7, 2020 Share Posted March 7, 2020 2 hours ago, rcmpayne said: I just read through all the post again, I'm sorry I don't see it. I see one link to an external page but it's way over my head. I see multiple people asking what this is and I'm not seeing any responses to it. maybe I'm blind Sent from my SM-N970U1 using Tapatalk 12 hours ago, bonienl said: See this Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.