March 31, 20206 yr Hi all, I setup my server and installed Unraid at the weekend and so far I am loving it. But I am getting a random problem, with the it hanging so I cannot access the gui, or even ping the IP. I cannot access any of the dockers either. I have attached the diagnostics. I have a quad port intel network card installed, with all 4 ports connected. Not sure if that is causing an issue. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks gamingnas-diagnostics-20200331-1653.zip
March 31, 20206 yr Community Expert Setup Syslog Server so syslog will be saved somewhere you can get it after rebooting: https://forums.unraid.net/topic/46802-faq-for-unraid-v6/?do=findComment&comment=781601
March 31, 20206 yr Author 23 minutes ago, trurl said: Setup Syslog Server so syslog will be saved somewhere you can get it after rebooting: https://forums.unraid.net/topic/46802-faq-for-unraid-v6/?do=findComment&comment=781601 Thanks, usually after a bit of waiting it does right itself and doesn't need a reboot. I have taken these from the system logs, after it settled down. Mar 31 05:47:05 GamingNAS kernel: docker0: port 4(veth7fc3892) entered blocking state Mar 31 05:47:05 GamingNAS kernel: docker0: port 4(veth7fc3892) entered forwarding state Mar 31 05:47:05 GamingNAS kernel: docker0: port 4(veth7fc3892) entered disabled state Mar 31 05:47:08 GamingNAS kernel: eth0: renamed from veth18ad00d Mar 31 05:47:08 GamingNAS kernel: IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): veth7fc3892: link becomes ready Mar 31 05:47:08 GamingNAS kernel: docker0: port 4(veth7fc3892) entered blocking state Mar 31 05:47:08 GamingNAS kernel: docker0: port 4(veth7fc3892) entered forwarding state Mar 31 05:47:10 GamingNAS avahi-daemon[2090]: Joining mDNS multicast group on interface veth7fc3892.IPv6 with address fe80::f86d:81ff:fe84:8378. Mar 31 05:47:10 GamingNAS avahi-daemon[2090]: New relevant interface veth7fc3892.IPv6 for mDNS. Mar 31 05:47:10 GamingNAS avahi-daemon[2090]: Registering new address record for fe80::f86d:81ff:fe84:8378 on veth7fc3892.*. Mar 31 06:50:34 GamingNAS kernel: veth18ad00d: renamed from eth0 Mar 31 06:50:34 GamingNAS kernel: docker0: port 4(veth7fc3892) entered disabled state Mar 31 06:50:34 GamingNAS avahi-daemon[2090]: Interface veth7fc3892.IPv6 no longer relevant for mDNS. Mar 31 06:50:34 GamingNAS avahi-daemon[2090]: Leaving mDNS multicast group on interface veth7fc3892.IPv6 with address fe80::f86d:81ff:fe84:8378. Mar 31 06:50:34 GamingNAS kernel: docker0: port 4(veth7fc3892) entered disabled state Mar 31 06:50:34 GamingNAS kernel: device veth7fc3892 left promiscuous mode Mar 31 06:50:34 GamingNAS kernel: docker0: port 4(veth7fc3892) entered disabled state Mar 31 06:50:34 GamingNAS avahi-daemon[2090]: Withdrawing address record for fe80::f86d:81ff:fe84:8378 on veth7fc3892. Mar 31 06:51:02 GamingNAS kernel: docker0: port 4(veth6f56dd3) entered blocking state Mar 31 06:51:02 GamingNAS kernel: docker0: port 4(veth6f56dd3) entered disabled state Mar 31 06:51:02 GamingNAS kernel: device veth6f56dd3 entered promiscuous mode Mar 31 06:51:02 GamingNAS kernel: IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): veth6f56dd3: link is not ready Mar 31 06:51:02 GamingNAS kernel: docker0: port 4(veth6f56dd3) entered blocking state Mar 31 06:51:02 GamingNAS kernel: docker0: port 4(veth6f56dd3) entered forwarding state Mar 31 06:51:02 GamingNAS kernel: docker0: port 4(veth6f56dd3) entered disabled state Mar 31 06:51:03 GamingNAS kernel: eth0: renamed from veth942c193 Mar 31 06:51:03 GamingNAS kernel: IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): veth6f56dd3: link becomes ready Mar 31 06:51:03 GamingNAS kernel: docker0: port 4(veth6f56dd3) entered blocking state Mar 31 06:51:03 GamingNAS kernel: docker0: port 4(veth6f56dd3) entered forwarding state Mar 31 06:51:05 GamingNAS avahi-daemon[2090]: Joining mDNS multicast group on interface veth6f56dd3.IPv6 with address fe80::f437:57ff:fe38:f64d. Mar 31 06:51:05 GamingNAS avahi-daemon[2090]: New relevant interface veth6f56dd3.IPv6 for mDNS. Mar 31 06:51:05 GamingNAS avahi-daemon[2090]: Registering new address record for fe80::f437:57ff:fe38:f64d on veth6f56dd3.*. Mar 31 08:50:32 GamingNAS kernel: igb 0000:04:00.1 eth2: igb: eth2 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX Mar 31 08:50:32 GamingNAS kernel: bond0: link status definitely up for interface eth2, 1000 Mbps full duplex Mar 31 08:50:40 GamingNAS kernel: igb 0000:04:00.0 eth0: igb: eth0 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX Mar 31 08:50:40 GamingNAS kernel: bond0: link status definitely up for interface eth0, 1000 Mbps full duplex Thanks
April 8, 20206 yr Author Hi, I have tried getting a syslog but it did not work. The hanging is happening randomly. It happened about 20 mins ago, here are my logs. Apr 8 15:56:28 GamingNAS kernel: br0: port 2(vnet0) entered disabled state Apr 8 15:56:28 GamingNAS kernel: device vnet0 left promiscuous mode Apr 8 15:56:28 GamingNAS kernel: br0: port 2(vnet0) entered disabled state Apr 8 16:01:17 GamingNAS kernel: br0: port 2(vnet0) entered blocking state Apr 8 16:01:17 GamingNAS kernel: br0: port 2(vnet0) entered disabled state Apr 8 16:01:17 GamingNAS kernel: device vnet0 entered promiscuous mode Apr 8 16:01:17 GamingNAS kernel: br0: port 2(vnet0) entered blocking state Apr 8 16:01:17 GamingNAS kernel: br0: port 2(vnet0) entered forwarding state Any help would appreciated. Thanks
April 8, 20206 yr Not necessarily your problem, but motherboards do tend to like matching sets of RAM. All 4 of your sticks are different from each other. If you must mix & match, then your best results will come from sticks that all have the same CL timings.
April 9, 20206 yr Author 15 hours ago, Squid said: Not necessarily your problem, but motherboards do tend to like matching sets of RAM. All 4 of your sticks are different from each other. If you must mix & match, then your best results will come from sticks that all have the same CL timings. Hi mate, thanks for the reply. Yeah I know, sadly it was all I had at the time. Will be looking to replace the RAM next payday I have a 4 port pcie intel nic and the onboard nic that I am using. Is there any benefit to having the extra card, or would I be better off using just the onboard port?
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.