Removed parity - still slow writing speed


Recommended Posts

I started multiple wget processes (fetches files through FTP from source NAS). Each process writes files to different disks.

1800044723_2020-04-2117_15_10.png.0df6e27674dc2c0acb736e1093563653.png.e38ece65254b1d48cb2701e0fd7cd467.png

 

The Unraid server has 10G:

1333535222_2020-04-2117_30_12.png.18d0cda0940ee7b9c3545ebe7936b73b.png.1e1bbbcef1d5b0aa7f8df6a17858ad3b.png

 

The source, too:

1456381396_2020-04-2117_30_44.png.db87e7ef58cde90a8af7c34cc9d5deaa.png.c1d37d447844c4a93f0e6d679f91b181.png

 

The load on the Unraid server looks good:

984344718_2020-04-2117_09_10.png.a80191cb47cd0d325a42ee979d860b21.png.9ebc850a3cc301ab9c8cf1c6cd8de04f.png

 

And on the source, too:

1302972632_2020-04-2117_34_22.png.d6265ba9335cd466e2e68854391aa1d7.png.a3c8c9cd6e0b34b158d1be0c0df0c69b.png

 

Finally I started a fourth wget process that targets disk 4. This wast the first time the transfer exceeded 1G:

1507769108_2020-04-2117_43_19.png.0ce2de9c7c26bed9cc3ba58a2901df20.thumb.png.abe04a2c8686025b780243bc2f61ce8f.png

 

Any idea why it could be so slow? I thought without parity it reaches the maximum write speed of the disk (up to 260 MB/s)?!

Edited by mgutt
Link to comment
3 hours ago, johnnie.black said:

Also you can see real-time read/write speeds on the GUI, toggle is on the right upper corner

Nice to know.

 

It jumps like crazy between 0 and 80 MB/s per Disk. Looks like wget is working in chunks. 

Edited by mgutt
Link to comment

Yes it was caused by wget. I tried the following smbclient command (source) and it hits the max write speed of the disk:

smbclient //10.1.2.3/video <smb_password> -U <smb_user> -c 'prompt ON; recurse ON; cd \Filme\KL\; lcd /mnt/user/Movies/KL/;mget *'

I started two processes and its really fast now:

6707951_2020-04-2200_33_32.png.ef68b8e4ef900c09f395f8944a45c356.png

 

Funnily the load is not really different:

446572788_2020-04-2200_34_05.thumb.png.b3b628a5a9971348996576ffdd5ee6a3.png

 

Sadly the source NAS seems to hit its limit now:

171549823_2020-04-2200_34_14.png.2b0147f093f5cb9994c84febb10eea7d.png

 

At least, I think that, because I was not able to raise the network traffic by starting three parallel smbclient processes, so I think the "volume utilization" is the bottleneck, now. I never really found out what Synology meant with that.

 

P.S. I hope someone can answer this question because I did not found out how to skip existing / older files with the smbclient command.

 

Edited by mgutt
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.