Jump to content

sixarm

Members
  • Posts

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by sixarm

  1. I agree that "nan" is a bug, and there are some things about the way this information is displayed even when it is working that is not exactly intuitive.

     

    However, the breakdown per drive is probably not what should be displayed. Your btrfs cache pool doesn't store things that way.

     

    You really only have 64GB total for both drives together. You would get more by using the 240G by itself, but you wouldn't get mirroring.

     

    btrfs disk usage calculator

     

    Ah, I didn't realize the cache pool was raid-1.  I was expecting something more like btrfs-single.  I just shutdown my array and added a second SSD to my cache pool expecting to get more space.  I need to adjust my expectations or raid settings if possible.

     

    Thanks.

  2. unRAID OS Version:

    6.0.1

     

    Description:

    I've got a couple of cache drives in my setup, 64G and 240G.  In the UI the free space graphs are incorrect.  Used space on the first drive 64G shows as "nan".

     

    How to reproduce:

    Install two ssd cache drives

     

    Expected results:

    I would expect to see a breakdown per drive just as I do in my array of drive. 

    Actual drive free space shown instead of "nan"

     

    Actual results:

    See attached screen grab

     

    Other information:

     

     

     

    unraid_cache_ui_bug.jpg.52084c32e85db90686d9745f5d390365.jpg

×
×
  • Create New...