Arch

Members
  • Posts

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Arch

  1. while waiting for nfs4 support, wrote this user.script for nfs3

    for version 6.6.6

    #!/bin/bash
    
    DEFAULT_RPC="/etc/default/rpc"
    STATD_PORT=32766
    LOCKD_PORT=32768
    
    RC_NFSD="/etc/rc.d/rc.nfsd"
    MOUNTD_PORT=32767
    
    nfs_config() (
    	set -euo pipefail
    	sed -i '
    	s/^#RPC_STATD_PORT=.*/RPC_STATD_PORT='$STATD_PORT'/;
    	s/^#LOCKD_TCP_PORT=.*/LOCKD_TCP_PORT='$LOCKD_PORT'/;
    	s/^#LOCKD_UDP_PORT=.*/LOCKD_UDP_PORT='$LOCKD_PORT'/;
    	' ${DEFAULT_RPC}
    	sed -i '
    	s/^\s\{4\}\/usr\/sbin\/rpc\.mountd$/    \/usr\/sbin\/rpc\.mountd -p '$MOUNTD_PORT'/;
    	' ${RC_NFSD}
    	/etc/rc.d/rc.rpc restart
    	sleep 1
    	/etc/rc.d/rc.nfsd restart
    )
    
    nfs_config
    if [[ $? -ne 0 ]]; then
    	/usr/local/emhttp/webGui/scripts/notify -i warning -s "NFS config failed"
    fi

     then check

    rpcinfo -p
    
       program vers proto   port  service
        100000    4   tcp    111  portmapper
        100000    3   tcp    111  portmapper
        100000    2   tcp    111  portmapper
        100000    4   udp    111  portmapper
        100000    3   udp    111  portmapper
        100000    2   udp    111  portmapper
        100024    1   udp  32766  status
        100024    1   tcp  32766  status
        100003    3   tcp   2049  nfs
        100003    3   udp   2049  nfs
        100021    1   udp  32768  nlockmgr
        100021    3   udp  32768  nlockmgr
        100021    4   udp  32768  nlockmgr
        100021    1   tcp  32768  nlockmgr
        100021    3   tcp  32768  nlockmgr
        100021    4   tcp  32768  nlockmgr
        100005    1   udp  32767  mountd
        100005    1   tcp  32767  mountd
        100005    2   udp  32767  mountd
        100005    2   tcp  32767  mountd
        100005    3   udp  32767  mountd
        100005    3   tcp  32767  mountd

     

  2. Squid great plugin, thank you.

     

    Have some question,

     

    when i rename file in monitored share no scan command received,

    but when open file with nano without editing scan command received.

     

    is it ok?