September 6, 201015 yr Hello, I had a power bump on my tower a few days ago. The APC kicked in so I didnt think too much about it at the time, it did what it was supposed to do. Unfortunately, I was copying data at the time and now I have errors on my Parity disk and the disk where the data was being copied at the time. None of my disks had any errors on them prior to the outage. Sep 2 15:12:42 Tower apcupsd[19710]: Power failure. Sep 2 15:12:43 Tower kernel: e1000e: eth0 NIC Link is Down Sep 2 15:12:44 Tower ifplugd(eth0)[1605]: Link beat lost. Sep 2 15:12:46 Tower apcupsd[19710]: Power is back. UPS running on mains. Sep 2 15:12:47 Tower kernel: e1000e: eth0 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX Sep 2 15:12:48 Tower ifplugd(eth0)[1605]: Link beat I've been monitoring these since the outage and they have not increased on either disk. I am more concerned with the Parity disk than the other but plan to replace both when necessary. I guess the question is, if these these numbers remain the same, do they need to be replaced immediately or just continue to monitor? Parity Disk » reallocated_sector_ct=1 » reallocated_event_count=1 Data was being copied to this disk » reallocated_sector_ct=6 » reallocated_event_count=3 Thankx Richard
September 6, 201015 yr Hello, I had a power bump on my tower a few days ago. The APC kicked in so I didnt think too much about it at the time, it did what it was supposed to do. Unfortunately, I was copying data at the time and now I have errors on my Parity disk and the disk where the data was being copied at the time. None of my disks had any errors on them prior to the outage. Sep 2 15:12:42 Tower apcupsd[19710]: Power failure. Sep 2 15:12:43 Tower kernel: e1000e: eth0 NIC Link is Down Sep 2 15:12:44 Tower ifplugd(eth0)[1605]: Link beat lost. Sep 2 15:12:46 Tower apcupsd[19710]: Power is back. UPS running on mains. Sep 2 15:12:47 Tower kernel: e1000e: eth0 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX Sep 2 15:12:48 Tower ifplugd(eth0)[1605]: Link beat I've been monitoring these since the outage and they have not increased on either disk. I am more concerned with the Parity disk than the other but plan to replace both when necessary. I guess the question is, if these these numbers remain the same, do they need to be replaced immediately or just continue to monitor? Parity Disk » reallocated_sector_ct=1 » reallocated_event_count=1 Data was being copied to this disk » reallocated_sector_ct=6 » reallocated_event_count=3 Thankx Richard no need to do anything at all other than to monitor the re-allocated sector count over the next few months/years. There are anywhere from 1000 to several thousand spare sectors on a modern disks.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.