January 1, 201115 yr I recently built my first unRAID server (or any computer) and am really quite happy. But, I was wondering if I posted some information, could you guys take a look and let me know if my speeds seem normal? I'm running 4.6 hardware; SUPERMICRO MBD-X7SPA-HF-O Mini ITX Intel Atom D510 processor Server Motherboard G.SKILL 4GB (2 x 2GB) 200-Pin DDR2 SO-DIMM DDR2 667 (PC2 5300) Dual Channel Kit Laptop Memory Model F2-5300CL5D-4GBSA parity WDC_WD20EARS-00M_WD-WCAZA2442274 disk1 WDC_WD20EARS-00M_WD-WMAZA1850629 disk2 WDC_WD20EARS-00M_WD-WMAZA1829827 disk3 WDC_WD10EACS-00D_WD-WCAU43940708 disk4 WDC_WD10EADS-00L_WD-WCAU4A270012 disk5 SAMSUNG_HD203WI_S27KJ1MSC02559 root@unRAID:~# ethtool eth0 Settings for eth0: Supported ports: [ TP ] Supported link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full 1000baseT/Full Supports auto-negotiation: Yes Advertised link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full 1000baseT/Full Advertised auto-negotiation: Yes Speed: 1000Mb/s Duplex: Full Port: Twisted Pair PHYAD: 1 Transceiver: internal Auto-negotiation: on Supports Wake-on: pumbag Wake-on: g Current message level: 0x00000001 (1) Link detected: yes root@unRAID:~# ifconfig eth0 eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:25:90:09:9b:e4 inet addr:192.168.0.100 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:46360464 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:25886940 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:683614449 (651.9 MiB) TX bytes:701978772 (669.4 MiB) Memory:fe9e0000-fea00000 root@unRAID:~# /root/mdcmd status | strings | grep rdevName rdevName.0=sda rdevName.1=sdg rdevName.2=sdd rdevName.3=sdc rdevName.4=sdb rdevName.5=sdf root@unRAID:~# hdparm -tT /dev/sdf /dev/sda: Timing cached reads: 1670 MB in 2.00 seconds = 835.41 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 334 MB in 3.01 seconds = 111.09 MB/sec /dev/sdg: Timing cached reads: 1678 MB in 2.00 seconds = 838.68 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 334 MB in 3.01 seconds = 110.83 MB/sec root@unRAID:~# hdparm -tT /dev/sdd /dev/sdd: Timing cached reads: 1668 MB in 2.00 seconds = 834.01 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 340 MB in 3.02 seconds = 112.73 MB/sec root@unRAID:~# hdparm -tT /dev/sdc /dev/sdc: Timing cached reads: 1662 MB in 2.00 seconds = 831.29 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 274 MB in 3.01 seconds = 91.07 MB/sec root@unRAID:~# hdparm -tT /dev/sdb /dev/sdb: Timing cached reads: 1686 MB in 2.00 seconds = 843.46 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 260 MB in 3.01 seconds = 86.44 MB/sec root@unRAID:~# hdparm -tT /dev/sdb /dev/sdf: Timing cached reads: 1656 MB in 2.00 seconds = 828.43 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 324 MB in 3.01 seconds = 107.81 MB/sec root@unRAID:~# hdparm -tT /dev/sdg root@unRAID:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=//mnt/disk1/test.dd count=8192000 8192000+0 records in 8192000+0 records out 4194304000 bytes (4.2 GB) copied, 153.101 s, 27.4 MB/s root@unRAID:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=//mnt/disk2/test.dd count=8192000 8192000+0 records in 8192000+0 records out 4194304000 bytes (4.2 GB) copied, 156.412 s, 26.8 MB/s root@unRAID:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=//mnt/disk3/test.dd count=8192000 8192000+0 records in 8192000+0 records out 4194304000 bytes (4.2 GB) copied, 129.676 s, 32.3 MB/s root@unRAID:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=//mnt/disk4/test.dd count=8192000 8192000+0 records in 8192000+0 records out 4194304000 bytes (4.2 GB) copied, 134.791 s, 31.1 MB/s root@unRAID:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=//mnt/disk5/test.dd count=8192000 8192000+0 records in 8192000+0 records out 4194304000 bytes (4.2 GB) copied, 177.866 s, 23.6 MB/s Also, If there are other tests I should run, please let me know. thanks, sean syslog-2011-01-01.txt
January 3, 201115 yr Looks completely normal to me. Hopefully you remembered to jumper your EARS drives... The real question is are you happy with the real-world performance you are seeing?
January 4, 201115 yr Author Thanks for responding, Rajahal. I did remember to jumper my ears drives (hi aiden ) and am pleased with the performance. I was just hoping to get confirmation from one of you fine folk with the expertise. Next project; sab and sickbeard. thanks again!
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.