mike_j1

Members
  • Posts

    14
  • Joined

  • Last visited

mike_j1's Achievements

Noob

Noob (1/14)

0

Reputation

  1. It starts with 10% and then counts up in 10% steps, i don't know what to tell you... But that's besides the point, i probably need to somehow get the data of the drives and replace the dead one, right? What's the best way to do so? Thanks
  2. Extended test didn't work i think, it took some time and after reaching 100% it still says 'No self-tests logged on this disk'
  3. I think i got the report: nas-smart-20200921-2005.zip
  4. Okay good to know, but it did work just fine for over a year. I should still be able to rescue my data, since it is a cache pool right?
  5. Okay i think i'm getting somewhere now. I don't know where yet, but hey. After i added a seperate psu for the harddrives and now the system seems to run stable. Yay 🙂 I was able to rebuild the array and all my data i fine. Now the next step was to try to reenable docker, aaaand the webinterface got really unresponsive and i was not able to shut the system down. Then my next thought was to rebuild the docker.img following this guide: So i deleted the old img and then went ahead and reenabled docker, same behavior: unresponsive webinterface and not able to shut the system down. I was able to get a diganostics zip using the command line (attached). I looks like one of the cache drives is done for? How to i go about fixing this? Do i just remove it from the cache pool? Thanks in advance, all your help is much appreciated! nas-diagnostics-20200920-2200.zip
  6. Thanks for the reply! since i already changed the power supply, my next step would be to change the mainboard, so i thought it would be best to get everything back into a working state before i do that. Can i even change the mainboard in this state?
  7. I tried to do the rebuild on top like last time, but now the array wont event start... Something about my cache drives? I'm getting kinda desperate right now... nas-diagnostics-20200915-2041.zip
  8. yes correct. Thats exactly what i am thinking. Its a 12v 120w powerbrick, but there is properbly still some regultion going on and it properbly limits the amperage through that one connector. I cant find any specs on how much im allowed to draw from this connector through... i will properbly just look into buying a new board and cpu. ryzen is fine with unraid right?
  9. Thanks for taking a look! So a new motherboard is the way to go since i already replaced the power supply? Maybe the internal sata power delivery is not strong enaugh, since this board is powerd through a DC connector. I think that the problems stared as soon as i added the fourth disk, so that would also point to a power problem.
  10. Hello again, now everything was working fine since my last post, but now a different disk entered error state. Could someone please take a look at the attached log if i need to replace the disk, or if it still looks fine? Also how do i tell this myself so i don't have to bother you guys every time i have a problem? Last time after the rebuild i swapped my power supply because i had the suspection that it was faulty and the spin retry count error and the spin down errors went away. Thanks in advance! nas-diagnostics-20200910-1927.zip
  11. First of all thanks a lot for your quick answer! So disk two definitly has a problem with it not being able to spin down? So right now i unasign disk 3, restart the array and rebuild, correct? Also should i be worried about the spin retry count thing?
  12. Hey guys, So today i got some worring notifications. First i got a warning that three of my disks have read error. I have never got that before and now three? A minute later i got an error that disk three is in error state (disk dsbl). When i got home i turned the array offline so there is no risk of more disks to die now that the array is vulnerable (i hope that this wasn‘t a bad desition) and while turning off i got another warning, this time about the paritiy disk. „Spin retry count (failing now) is 14“. I really don‘t know what the best way forward would be right now so i‘m asking for your help! Attached you‘ll find a dignostics zip file. Best regards Mike nas-diagnostics-20200805-1802.zip
  13. Really? Shouldn't raid 1 be the same performance than a single drive? Because the individual drives are way faster. Even the array is faster than the cache...
  14. Huy guys, I hope someone can halp me. I did my best to search the forum, but i could not find a solution. I have two ssd's in a raid 1 cache pool. When i do a write test onto /mnt/cache using dd (10GB) i get a write speed of 80MB/s and thats after a manual rebalance and a manual trim, before that it was even worse. One of the ssd's is connected using a usb adapter and one is a m.2 drive. I know this setup is not ideal but i still would expect at least 200mb/s or am i wrong? I'll atach a diagnostic zip so you can better understand my configuration. Thanks in advance for helping! nas-diagnostics-20200322-1400.zip